Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Solutions Manual Introduction to Real Analysis 4th Edition By Robert G. Bartle, Donald R. Sherbert

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
105
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
30-12-2025
Written in
2025/2026

This is a complete solutions manual PDF for Introduction to Real Analysis 4th Edition By Robert G. Bartle, Donald R. Sherbert. It provides detailed, step-by-step answers to all exercises and problems.

Institution
Real Analysis
Course
Real Analysis

Content preview

Solutions Manual
Introduction to Real Analysis 4th Edition
By
Robert G. Bartle,
Donald R. Sherbert



( All Chapters Included - 100% Verified Solutions )




1

, CHAPTER 1
PRELIMINARIES

We suggest that this chapter be treated as review and covered quickly, without
detailed classroom discussion. For one reason, many of these ideas will be already
familiar to the students — at least informally. Further, we believe that, in practice,
those notions of importance are best learned in the arena of real analysis, where
their use and significance are more apparent. Dwelling on the formal aspect of
sets and functions does not contribute very greatly to the students’ understanding
of real analysis.
If the students have already studied abstract algebra, number theory or com-
binatorics, they should be familiar with the use of mathematical induction. If not,
then some time should be spent on mathematical induction.
The third section deals with finite, infinite and countable sets. These notions
are important and should be briefly introduced. However, we believe that it is
not necessary to go into the proofs of these results at this time.

Section 1.1
Students are usually familiar with the notations and operations of set algebra,
so that a brief review is quite adequate. One item that should be mentioned is
that two sets A and B are often proved to be equal by showing that: (i) if x ∈ A,
then x ∈ B, and (ii) if x ∈ B, then x ∈ A. This type of element-wise argument is
very common in real analysis, since manipulations with set identities is often not
suitable when the sets are complicated.
Students are often not familiar with the notions of functions that are injective
(= one-one) or surjective (= onto).
Sample Assignment: Exercises 1, 3, 9, 14, 15, 20.
Partial Solutions:

1. (a) B ∩ C = {5, 11, 17, 23, . . .} = {6k − 1 : k ∈ N}, A ∩ (B ∩ C) = {5, 11, 17}
(b) (A ∩ B) \ C = {2, 8, 14, 20}
(c) (A ∩ C) \ B = {3, 7, 9, 13, 15, 19}
2. The sets are equal to (a) A, (b) A ∩ B, (c) the empty set.
3. If A ⊆ B, then x ∈ A implies x ∈ B, whence x ∈ A ∩ B, so that A ⊆ A ∩ B ⊆ A.
Thus, if A ⊆ B, then A = A ∩ B.
Conversely, if A = A ∩ B, then x ∈ A implies x ∈ A ∩ B, whence x ∈ B.
Thus if A = A ∩ B, then A ⊆ B.
4. If x is in A \ (B ∩ C), then x is in A but x ∈ / B ∩ C, so that x ∈ A and x is
either not in B or not in C. Therefore either x ∈ A \ B or x ∈ A \ C, which
implies that x ∈ (A \ B) ∪ (A \ C). Thus A \ (B ∩ C) ⊆ (A \ B) ∪ (A \ C).

1




2

,2 Bartle and Sherbert

Conversely, if x is in (A \ B) ∪ (A \ C), then x ∈ A \ B or x ∈ A \ C. Thus
x ∈ A and either x ∈ / B or x ∈ / C, which implies that x ∈ A but x ∈ / B ∩ C,
so that x ∈ A \ (B ∩ C). Thus (A \ B) ∪ (A \ C) ⊆ A \ (B ∩ C).
Since the sets A \ (B ∩ C) and (A \ B) ∪ (A \ C) contain the same elements,
they are equal.
5. (a) If x ∈ A ∩ (B ∪ C), then x ∈ A and x ∈ B ∪ C. Hence we either have
(i) x ∈ A and x ∈ B, or we have (ii) x ∈ A and x ∈ C. Therefore, either
x ∈ A ∩ B or x ∈ A ∩ C, so that x ∈ (A ∩ B) ∪ (A ∩ C). This shows that
A ∩ (B ∪ C) is a subset of (A ∩ B) ∪ (A ∩ C).
Conversely, let y be an element of (A ∩ B) ∪ (A ∩ C). Then either (j) y ∈
A ∩ B, or (jj) y ∈ A ∩ C. It follows that y ∈ A and either y ∈ B or y ∈ C.
Therefore, y ∈ A and y ∈ B ∪ C, so that y ∈ A ∩ (B ∪ C). Hence (A ∩ B) ∪
(A ∩ C) is a subset of A ∩ (B ∪ C).
In view of Definition 1.1.1, we conclude that the sets A ∩ (B ∪ C) and
(A ∩ B) ∪ (A ∩ C) are equal.
(b) Similar to (a).
6. The set D is the union of {x : x ∈ A and x ∈ / B} and {x : x ∈
/ A and x ∈ B}.
7. Here An = {n + 1, 2(n + 1), . . .}.
(a) A1 = {2, 4, 6, 8, . . .}, A2 = {3, 6, 9, 12, . . .}, A1 ∩ A2 = {6, 12, 18, 24, . . .} =
{6k :k ∈ N} = A5 .
(b) An = N \ {1}, because if n > 1, then n ∈ An−1 ; moreover 1 ∈ / An .
Also An = ∅, because n ∈ / An for any n ∈ N.
8. (a) The graph consists of four horizontal line segments.
(b) The graph consists of three vertical line segments.
9. No. For example, both (0, 1) and (0, − 1) belong to C.
10. (a) f (E) = {1/x2 : 1 ≤ x ≤ 2} = {y : 14 ≤ y ≤ 1} = [ 14 , 1].
(b) f −1 (G) = {x : 1 ≤ 1/x2 ≤ 4} = {x : 14 ≤ x2 ≤ 1} = [−1, − 12 ] ∪ [ 12 , 1].
11. (a) f (E) = {x + 2 : 0 ≤ x ≤ 1} = [2, 3], so h(E) = g(f (E)) = g([2, 3]) =
{y 2 : 2 ≤ y ≤ 3} = [4, 9].
(b) g −1 (G) = {y : 0 ≤ y 2 ≤ 4} = [−2, 2], so h−1 (G) = f −1 (g −1 (G)) =
f −1 ([−2, 2]) = {x : −2 ≤ x + 2 ≤ 2} = [−4, 0].
12. If 0 is removed from E and F , then their intersection is empty, but the
intersection of the images under f is {y : 0 < y ≤ 1}.
13. E \ F = {x : −1 ≤ x < 0}, f (E) \ f (F ) is empty, and f (E \ F ) =
{y : 0 < y ≤ 1}.
14. If y ∈ f (E ∩ F ), then there exists x ∈ E ∩ F such that y = f (x). Since x ∈ E
implies y ∈ f (E), and x ∈ F implies y ∈ f (F ), we have y ∈ f (E) ∩ f (F ). This
proves f (E ∩ F ) ⊆ f (E) ∩ f (F ).
15. If x ∈ f −1 (G) ∩ f −1 (H), then x ∈ f −1 (G) and x ∈ f −1 (H), so that f (x) ∈ G
and f (x) ∈ H. Then f (x) ∈ G ∩ H, and hence x ∈ f −1 (G ∩ H). This shows




3

, Chapter 1 — Preliminaries 3

that f −1 (G) ∩ f −1 (H) ⊆ f −1 (G ∩ H). The opposite inclusion is shown in
Example 1.1.8(b). The proof for unions is similar.
√ √
16. If f (a) = f (b), then a/ a2 + 1 = b/ b2 + 1, from which it follows that a2 = b2 .
Since a and b must have the  same sign, we get a = b, and hence f is injective.
If −1 < y < 1, then x := y/ 1 − y 2 satisfies f (x) =√y (why?), √ so that f takes R
onto the set {y : − 1 < y < 1}. If x > 0, then x = x2 < x2 + 1, so it follows
that f (x) ∈ {y : 0 < y < 1}.
17. One bijection is the familiar linear function that maps a to 0 and b to 1,
namely, f (x) := (x − a)/(b − a). Show that this function works.
18. (a) Let f (x) = 2x, g(x) = 3x.
(b) Let f (x) = x2 , g(x) = x, h(x) = 1. (Many examples are possible.)
19. (a) If x ∈ f −1 (f (E)), then f (x) ∈ f (E), so that there exists x1 ∈ E such
that f (x1 ) = f (x). If f is injective, then x1 = x, whence x ∈ E. Therefore,
f −1 (f (E)) ⊆ E. Since E ⊆ f −1 (f (E)) holds for any f , we have set equality
when f is injective. See Example 1.1.8(a) for an example.
(b) If y ∈ H and f is surjective, then there exists x ∈ A such that f (x) = y.
Then x ∈ f −1 (H) so that y ∈ f (f −1 (H)). Therefore H ⊆ f (f −1 (H)). Since
f (f −1 (H)) ⊆ H for any f , we have set equality when f is surjective. See
Example 1.1.8(a) for an example.
20. (a) Since y = f (x) if and only if x = f −1 (y), it follows that f −1 (f (x)) = x and
f (f −1 (y)) = y.
(b) Since f is injective, then f −1 is injective on R(f ). And since f is surjec-
tive, then f −1 is defined on R(f ) = B.
21. If g(f (x1 )) = g(f (x2 )), then f (x1 ) = f (x2 ), so that x1 = x2 , which implies that
g ◦ f is injective. If w ∈ C, there exists y ∈ B such that g(y) = w, and there
exists x ∈ A such that f (x) = y. Then g(f (x)) = w, so that g ◦ f is surjective.
Thus g ◦ f is a bijection.
22. (a) If f (x1 ) = f (x2 ), then g(f (x1 )) = g(f (x2 )), which implies x1 = x2 , since
g ◦ f is injective. Thus f is injective.
(b) Given w ∈ C, since g ◦ f is surjective, there exists x ∈ A such that
g(f (x)) = w. If y := f (x), then y ∈ B and g(y) = w. Thus g is surjective.
23. We have x ∈ f −1 (g −1 (H)) ⇐⇒ f (x) ∈ g −1 (H) ⇐⇒ g(f (x)) ∈ H ⇐⇒ x ∈
(g ◦ f )−1 (H).
24. If g(f (x)) = x for all x ∈ D(f ), then g ◦ f is injective, and Exercise 22(a)
implies that f is injective on D(f ). If f (g(y)) = y for all y ∈ D(g), then
Exercise 22(b) implies that f maps D(f ) onto D(g). Thus f is a bijection of
D(f ) onto D(g), and g = f −1 .

Section 1.2
The method of proof known as Mathematical Induction is used frequently in real
analysis, but in many situations the details follow a routine patterns and are




4

Written for

Institution
Real Analysis
Course
Real Analysis

Document information

Uploaded on
December 30, 2025
Number of pages
105
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$29.48
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
reckmila Massachusetts Institute Of Technology
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
12
Member since
9 months
Number of followers
0
Documents
94
Last sold
3 days ago
Miss Fullmark

High-quality solutions manuals crafted to help you master every chapter and score full marks.

3.5

2 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
1
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions