WGU D002 Comprehensive 2026-2027 Frequently Tested Questions With
ELABORATED 100% Correct COMPLETE SOLUTIONS
Guaranteed Pass!!Current Update!!
1. In , the court extended a pre- Mills v. Board of Education. District of Columbia
vious decision to include all children
with disabilities.
2. What is the legal justification for Brown v. Board of Education
Special Education?
3. The U.S. Supreme Court helped in Tatro v. State of Texas, 1980
that catheterization qualifies
as a related service.
4. A seventh-grade student of color re- Diana and Larry P.
cently moved to a new school. The
school is concerned about the stu-
dent and refers him for special ed-
ucation testing. The school psychol-
ogist administers a group IQ exam
that was biased toward Eurocentric
culture which was not the student's
culture. The exam determines that
the student's IQ is below average
and qualifies him for special educa-
tion services. Which cases relates to
this scenario?
5. Which case includes this ruling? Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia
A State cannot deny education to
students with behavior challenges
or emotional disturbance because
of funding and must observe due
process for all students.
6. Hobson v. Hansen, Diana, Larry P
, Which three cases provided the reg-
ulations for non-biased, multidisci-
plinary evaluation?
7. Mark all the elements that relate to Separation is stigmatizing, Expectations for settings
LRE. other than the general education classroom may be
too low, There is value in peer interactions for students
with and without disabilities
8. Which case(s) informed this stan- Rowley and Endrew
dard? The IEP must be federally
compliant and the child must bene-
fit from the services provided by the
district so that s/he receives educa-
tional benefit.
9. Which case affirmed that if misbe- Honig v. Doe
havior is disability-related, a student
cannot be indefinitely excluded?
10. The district is suffering serious fi- Mills v. Board of Education of the D.C.
nancial issues. The district decides
that all 1:1 paraprofessionals for
students with special needs must
begin working with more than one
student. This way the paras will keep
their jobs and all students will re-
ceive some service. This scenario is
a violation of due process. Which
case is most relevant in this sce-
nario?
11. No, only one test was administered
, Haben is a second-grader and im-
migrated from Eritrea about 18
months ago. She only speaks
Tigrinya. Her teachers observe that
she is not improving in her Eng-
lish Language learning and failing
to make progress in all academ-
ic areas. She meets with the ELL
teacher 5 times per week and a para
pushes into the classroom to sup-
port Haben. Haben is doing well in
art. Haben's teacher referred her for
special education assessment for a
suspected intellectual disability. The
school psychologist was able to ad-
minister an individualized IQ in Tin-
grinya. The scores from that evalua-
tion indicate that Haben does qual-
ify for an IEP under the category
of Intellectual Disability. Did Haben
receive a non-biased, multi-discipli-
nary evaluation?
12. Mr. Rich is a special education Explain to Sandra that it is unfortunate that the home-
teacher. Sandra, a student on the work will be late. Those are the natural consequences
autism spectrum, runs into the for any student.
room in tears. She is upset because
she left her homework at home and
she will lose points in math because
of it. Sandra has an IEP. There is no
accommodation for late work.
What is the ethical thing to do?
ELABORATED 100% Correct COMPLETE SOLUTIONS
Guaranteed Pass!!Current Update!!
1. In , the court extended a pre- Mills v. Board of Education. District of Columbia
vious decision to include all children
with disabilities.
2. What is the legal justification for Brown v. Board of Education
Special Education?
3. The U.S. Supreme Court helped in Tatro v. State of Texas, 1980
that catheterization qualifies
as a related service.
4. A seventh-grade student of color re- Diana and Larry P.
cently moved to a new school. The
school is concerned about the stu-
dent and refers him for special ed-
ucation testing. The school psychol-
ogist administers a group IQ exam
that was biased toward Eurocentric
culture which was not the student's
culture. The exam determines that
the student's IQ is below average
and qualifies him for special educa-
tion services. Which cases relates to
this scenario?
5. Which case includes this ruling? Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia
A State cannot deny education to
students with behavior challenges
or emotional disturbance because
of funding and must observe due
process for all students.
6. Hobson v. Hansen, Diana, Larry P
, Which three cases provided the reg-
ulations for non-biased, multidisci-
plinary evaluation?
7. Mark all the elements that relate to Separation is stigmatizing, Expectations for settings
LRE. other than the general education classroom may be
too low, There is value in peer interactions for students
with and without disabilities
8. Which case(s) informed this stan- Rowley and Endrew
dard? The IEP must be federally
compliant and the child must bene-
fit from the services provided by the
district so that s/he receives educa-
tional benefit.
9. Which case affirmed that if misbe- Honig v. Doe
havior is disability-related, a student
cannot be indefinitely excluded?
10. The district is suffering serious fi- Mills v. Board of Education of the D.C.
nancial issues. The district decides
that all 1:1 paraprofessionals for
students with special needs must
begin working with more than one
student. This way the paras will keep
their jobs and all students will re-
ceive some service. This scenario is
a violation of due process. Which
case is most relevant in this sce-
nario?
11. No, only one test was administered
, Haben is a second-grader and im-
migrated from Eritrea about 18
months ago. She only speaks
Tigrinya. Her teachers observe that
she is not improving in her Eng-
lish Language learning and failing
to make progress in all academ-
ic areas. She meets with the ELL
teacher 5 times per week and a para
pushes into the classroom to sup-
port Haben. Haben is doing well in
art. Haben's teacher referred her for
special education assessment for a
suspected intellectual disability. The
school psychologist was able to ad-
minister an individualized IQ in Tin-
grinya. The scores from that evalua-
tion indicate that Haben does qual-
ify for an IEP under the category
of Intellectual Disability. Did Haben
receive a non-biased, multi-discipli-
nary evaluation?
12. Mr. Rich is a special education Explain to Sandra that it is unfortunate that the home-
teacher. Sandra, a student on the work will be late. Those are the natural consequences
autism spectrum, runs into the for any student.
room in tears. She is upset because
she left her homework at home and
she will lose points in math because
of it. Sandra has an IEP. There is no
accommodation for late work.
What is the ethical thing to do?
