Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

WGU C983 Task 2 Passed Submission (2026) – Quality Improvement in Healthcare

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
7
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
04-01-2026
Written in
2025/2026

INSTANT PDF DOWNLOAD. This verified WGU C983 Task 2 – Quality Improvement in Healthcare pilot plan template earned a first-attempt pass and demonstrates effective pilot planning, outcome measures, stakeholder roles, implementation strategy, and alignment with WGU’s Task 2 rubric. Ideal as a structured reference for formatting, expectations, and content flow for students completing C983 in the 2026 academic year. WGU C983 Task 2, Quality Improvement in Healthcare WGU, WGU C983 Passed Submission, C983 Task 2 Example, WGU Healthcare Quality Task, C983 Pilot Plan Template, WGU Task 2 PDF, C983 First Attempt Pass, WGU Quality Improvement Project, C983 Sample Submission, WGU Healthcare Management, C983 Assessment Guide, WGU C983 2026, C983 Task Help, Healthcare Pilot Plan WGU, C983 Study Resource, WGU Healthcare PA, Quality Improvement Pilot Plan, WGU C983 Example, C983 Passed Task, WGU Healthcare Assignment

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

C983
Quality Improvement in Healthcare

TASK 2
Pilot Plan Template
(Passed First Attempt)
Western Governors University

, Task 2
A. Perform a root-cause analysis by doing the following:
1. Critique the continuous quality improvement (CQI) team’s five whys analysis by
explaining how it could have been conducted more effectively.

The initial 5 why analysis focuses too specifically on the emergency
department without taking into consideration of other entities that impact the
patient satisfaction of emergency medicine. This is too narrow of a scope and
focus which will bring some analysis back, but not enough to make a large
scale change necessary to impact patient satisfaction. The questions asked
were valid, but the problem requires much more than just the 5 proposed
questions in the 5 Why analysis- digging deeper and asking a set of 5 whys to
lead and direct the quality improvement is necessary in this situation (Lighter,
2011).



a. Discuss whether the “why” cycle has been performed to a logical end in
which additional questions would not change the response.

The “why” cycle here would not lead to a logical end; additional questions
would surely change the responses. As we dig deeper into the 5 Why analysis,
more and more is uncovered with each set of questions. This is a simple
technique to determine cause, and a cause can be detected early in the
questions, but here there are more than one cause and many potential
solutions paired with each cause. By further evaluating and preforming more
questioning we can figure out what cause has the highest impact and change
the process to alter patient satisfaction (Lighter, 2011).



2. Using the attached template, create an Ishikawa
diagram using the information from the process flowchart,
SIPOC map (from Task 1), and the five whys analysis.


a. Explain the effectiveness of using the Ishikawa diagram to synthesize the
results from multiple information sources.

Ishikawa diagram, like the SIPOC diagram, allow analysis of each part of a
process to evaluate effectiveness, limitation, and opportunity within each
section of the process and outcomes. It spreads the process out to be able to
visualize every step and help identify the clear gaps in the process
management. By using this it can be easier to decide what areas need
improvement and where the direct patient impact sections exist. Since the
process is spread out, we can implement changes to involve more processes
or tool to help perfect the process where opportunities exist.




This study source was downloaded by 100000902171055 from CourseHero.com on 11-13-2025 21:45:20 GMT -06:00


https://www.coursehero.com/file/73033695/C983-Task-2-Jdocx/

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
January 4, 2026
Number of pages
7
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$13.99
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
LectJoshua Howard Community College
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
9021
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
5501
Documents
7659
Last sold
3 hours ago

4.0

1658 reviews

5
866
4
317
3
230
2
72
1
173

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions