2
SQF Food Safety Exam with accurate detailed solutions
|| || || || || || ||
Recall Crisis Management Goals -✔✔Protect consumers
|| || || || ||
Maintain your company's reputation || || ||
Recover any losses || ||
Cause for a recall -✔✔Design defect, contamination, mis-branding
|| || || || || || ||
Three types of recall -✔✔Class I
|| || || || ||
There is a reasonable probability that the use of, or exposure to , a product will cause
|| || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
serious adverse health consequences or death.
|| || || || ||
Class II ||
The use of, or exposure to , a product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse
|| || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
health consequences. ||
Class III ||
|| The use of, or exposure to a product is not likely to cause adverse health consequences.
|| || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
Risk of not having a recall -✔✔Product liability claims
|| || || || || || || ||
Jail Time
||
Harming and/or killing a person || || || ||
Seizure
Costs of a recall -✔✔Direct
|| || || ||
|| First party operations
|| ||
, 2
|| Contract services ||
|| Third party liability || ||
Indirect
|| Loss of customer good will
|| || || ||
|| Loss of reputation|| ||
|| Brand rehab ||
Georgia Tech findings -✔✔That fast response to a recall can improve customer satisfaction
|| || || || || || || || || || || ||
Mock Recall -✔✔The product withdrawal and recall system shall be reviewed, tested and
|| || || || || || || || || || || || ||
verified as effective at least annually. || || || || ||
Ensure everyone on the product withdrawal team understands their role
|| || || || || || || || ||
Goal is for 100% Traceability within 2 hours
|| || || || || || ||
Any shortcomings should be evaluated and tested again after alteration
|| || || || || || || || ||
CIP and Traceability -✔✔CIP type designated for Critical Tracking Event equipment. (Full,
|| || || || || || || || || || || ||
Sanitize) ||
CIP occurs on raw silos before refilling.
|| || || || || || ||
CIP resets Critical Tracking Event lot when complete.
|| || || || || || ||
Why SQF/GSFI -✔✔- Build Confidence in Third Party Certification - Reduce Inefficiency in
|| || || || || || || || || || || ||
the Food System
|| || ||
Why SQF for retailers -✔✔• From a retailer perspective it is critical that they have
|| || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
confidence in the audits of their suppliers || || || || || ||
SQF Food Safety Exam with accurate detailed solutions
|| || || || || || ||
Recall Crisis Management Goals -✔✔Protect consumers
|| || || || ||
Maintain your company's reputation || || ||
Recover any losses || ||
Cause for a recall -✔✔Design defect, contamination, mis-branding
|| || || || || || ||
Three types of recall -✔✔Class I
|| || || || ||
There is a reasonable probability that the use of, or exposure to , a product will cause
|| || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
serious adverse health consequences or death.
|| || || || ||
Class II ||
The use of, or exposure to , a product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse
|| || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
health consequences. ||
Class III ||
|| The use of, or exposure to a product is not likely to cause adverse health consequences.
|| || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
Risk of not having a recall -✔✔Product liability claims
|| || || || || || || ||
Jail Time
||
Harming and/or killing a person || || || ||
Seizure
Costs of a recall -✔✔Direct
|| || || ||
|| First party operations
|| ||
, 2
|| Contract services ||
|| Third party liability || ||
Indirect
|| Loss of customer good will
|| || || ||
|| Loss of reputation|| ||
|| Brand rehab ||
Georgia Tech findings -✔✔That fast response to a recall can improve customer satisfaction
|| || || || || || || || || || || ||
Mock Recall -✔✔The product withdrawal and recall system shall be reviewed, tested and
|| || || || || || || || || || || || ||
verified as effective at least annually. || || || || ||
Ensure everyone on the product withdrawal team understands their role
|| || || || || || || || ||
Goal is for 100% Traceability within 2 hours
|| || || || || || ||
Any shortcomings should be evaluated and tested again after alteration
|| || || || || || || || ||
CIP and Traceability -✔✔CIP type designated for Critical Tracking Event equipment. (Full,
|| || || || || || || || || || || ||
Sanitize) ||
CIP occurs on raw silos before refilling.
|| || || || || || ||
CIP resets Critical Tracking Event lot when complete.
|| || || || || || ||
Why SQF/GSFI -✔✔- Build Confidence in Third Party Certification - Reduce Inefficiency in
|| || || || || || || || || || || ||
the Food System
|| || ||
Why SQF for retailers -✔✔• From a retailer perspective it is critical that they have
|| || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
confidence in the audits of their suppliers || || || || || ||
