Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

ANCIENT GREEK PHILOSOPHERS PRACTICE MILESTONE Latest 2020

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
14
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
28-03-2021
Written in
2020/2021

ANCIENT GREEK PHILOSOPHERS PRACTICE MILESTONE Latest 2020 (A GRADE) UNIT 1 PRACTICE MILESTONE You passed this Practice Milestone. When you take the actual Milestone, you must score 50% or higher to pass. 21 questions were answered correctly. 4 questions were answered incorrectly. 1 Budapest is a city in Hungary. Roland was born in Budapest. Therefore, Roland was born in Hungary. Assuming that both premises are true, evaluate the argument and determine which of the answer options describes it. • Inductive, strong, cogent • Deductive, valid, sound • Deductive, invalid, unsound • Inductive, weak, uncogent RATIONALE The inferential claim in this example is one of logical certainty, and is about definition and form rather than cause and effect. As a result, this a deductive argument. Because a case cannot exist in which the premises are true and the conclusion is false, this argument is valid. Also, this argument is sound because the premises are true. CONCEPT Evaluating an Argument in Action 2 All of the statements are central themes of Parmenidean metaphysics, EXCEPT: • The world we sense is genuine. • The opinions of mortal men are universally unreliable. • The Parmenidean worldview contradicts the world we are familiar with. • The universe is one, unchanging entity. RATIONALE Parmenidean metaphysics establishes a division between the mortal world (i.e., the world of the senses) and reality. Reality is "what is;" it is eternal and unchanging. The world of the senses is "what is not," a transient and illusory world of change. Therefore, Parmenides would not say that the world we sense is genuine. All of the other statements accurately represent Parmenidean metaphysics. CONCEPT Parmenides and the Doctrine of Permanence 3 Nancy was talking with a friend about immigration in the U.S. Nancy believes that illegal immigration to the United States is harmful to the nation, and that antiimmigration laws should be strictly applied. Choose the statement by Nancy that demonstrates an inconsistent belief. • “I hired an immigrant to landscape my yard for much less than my gardener demanded.” • “I will not buy vegetables from farmers who use migrant labor.” • “The United States will become a safe nation when all illegal immigrants are removed.” • “If they break the law to enter the country, it proves that they don’t respect our laws.” RATIONALE To live philosophically, it is necessary to examine beliefs to ground them in knowledge, and to then act according to those beliefs. By making an exception to her position on immigration to hire a migrant laborer at low cost, Nancy displays an inconsistent philosophical worldview. CONCEPT Philosophical Analysis as a Way of Life 4 Several hours of heavy rain is a __________ condition for a wet yard. Choose the answer that correctly completes this sentence. • neither necessary nor sufficient • both necessary and sufficient • necessary, not sufficient • sufficient, not necessary RATIONALE Several hours of heavy rain will always make the yard wet, so this a sufficient condition, or logical guarantee, for a wet yard. However, not all wet yards are caused by heavy rain, so heavy rain is not a necessary condition, or logical requirement, for a wet yard. CONCEPT Plato: An academic approach to concepts 5 Consider identifying the essence of a pencil. The first question Aristotle would ask is, “What kind of thing is it?” The answer might be: “A pencil is a writing utensil.” Which question would Aristotle ask next? • How does a union of form and matter create this pencil? • What is the substance

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
March 28, 2021
Number of pages
14
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$12.69
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
walli Strayer University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
76
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
74
Documents
0
Last sold
1 year ago

4.5

8 reviews

5
5
4
2
3
1
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions