CMY3701
ASSIGNMENT 1
DUE DATE: 8 APRIL 2026
, CMY3701 Assignment 1 2026
SECTION A
1.1. Critically evaluate Cohen and Felson's (1979) Rational Choice
Theory as an explanation for criminal behaviour. In your answer,
explain the core assumptions of the theory, discuss how offenders are
thought to make decisions, and provide contemporary examples.
Cohen and Felson’s contribution to contemporary criminology must be
understood within the broader revival of classical criminological thinking,
which views offenders as rational, decision-making actors. Their work,
particularly the routine activities framework, laid the foundation for later
rational choice perspectives by shifting the focus away from individual
pathology and towards criminal opportunity and situational choice (Vold,
Bernard & Snipes, 2002).
Core assumptions of Rational Choice Theory
Rational Choice Theory assumes that criminal behaviour results from
purposeful and reasoned decision-making, even though such rationality
may be bounded by limited information, time constraints, and emotional
pressures (Newburn, 2007). Offenders are not seen as driven solely by
biological or social determinism, but rather as actors who:
ASSIGNMENT 1
DUE DATE: 8 APRIL 2026
, CMY3701 Assignment 1 2026
SECTION A
1.1. Critically evaluate Cohen and Felson's (1979) Rational Choice
Theory as an explanation for criminal behaviour. In your answer,
explain the core assumptions of the theory, discuss how offenders are
thought to make decisions, and provide contemporary examples.
Cohen and Felson’s contribution to contemporary criminology must be
understood within the broader revival of classical criminological thinking,
which views offenders as rational, decision-making actors. Their work,
particularly the routine activities framework, laid the foundation for later
rational choice perspectives by shifting the focus away from individual
pathology and towards criminal opportunity and situational choice (Vold,
Bernard & Snipes, 2002).
Core assumptions of Rational Choice Theory
Rational Choice Theory assumes that criminal behaviour results from
purposeful and reasoned decision-making, even though such rationality
may be bounded by limited information, time constraints, and emotional
pressures (Newburn, 2007). Offenders are not seen as driven solely by
biological or social determinism, but rather as actors who:
