Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Samenvatting - Nudging ()

Rating
-
Sold
2
Pages
68
Uploaded on
18-02-2026
Written in
2025/2026

This summary (68 pages) contains all the material you need for the exam: both lecture notes and accompanying literature. The content is clearly organized by week, so that you can study in a focused and efficient way.

Institution
Course

Content preview

W1: Introduction
Literature
Thaler & Sunstein: part 1
The concept of a nudge
Nudge = any aspect of the choice environment that alters people’s behavior in
predictable ways without forbidding any options or significantly changing their
economic incentives.

Nudges are gentle pushes that help people make better choices for
themselves and society while preserving freedom of choice.

Example: Chicago lake shore drive stripes → painted lines narrow visually,
making drivers slow down automatically



Libertarian Paternalism
Libertarian Paternalism = a philosophy of policy-making combining two
principles:

(1) Libertarian = people should be free to choose.

(2) Paternalist = institutions can legitimately influence choices to make
people better off (as judged by themselves

Core logic → humans often act against their own interests because of
limited willpower, biases, or information overload.

Nudges guide them toward beneficial decisions while preserving
autonomy



Assumptions and misconceptions on human decision making that are often
found in policy makers
Tempting = when we consume more of it when we are in a hot state (highly
aroused)



W1: Introduction 1

, Loewenstein → hot-cold empathy gap = even if people realize that they
behave differently when aroused, they underestimate the strength of the effect

When in a cold state, we do not appreciate the extent to which our desires
and our behavior will be altered when we are under the influence of arousal

As a result, our behavior reflects a certain naivete about the effects that
context can have on choice

E.g., Luke, on a diet, agrees to go out for a business dinner, thinking
that it will be easy enough to have just one cocktail and no dessert. But
then the host orders a bottle of wine and the waiter brings by the
dessert cart, and all bets are off.



Two system conception of self-control:

Planner = reflective system; tries to promote long-term welfare but must
cope with the feelings and strong will of the doer

Enables us to resist temptation by assessing how we should react

Doer = automatic system; is exposed to the temptations that come with
arousal

Brain is tempted


Strategies for planners to control conflicts with doers (posed by private and
public institutions):

Informal bets = e.g., missing a deadline means paying 100eu to a friend

A company (stickk.com) has been invented to facilitate such friend
commitments

Forbid certain substances

Tax on sugar/cigarettes

Government imposed self-control strategy → daylight saving time

Bank imposed self-control strategy → saving accounts




W1: Introduction 2

, Mental accounting = the system (implicit or explicit) that households use to
evaluate, regulate and process their home budget


Economic theory → money is fungible = it doesn’t come with labels

I.e., 100eu in the travel savings can buy just as much food as the same
amount in the food savings

However, households adopt mental accounting schemes that violate
fungibility for the same reasons that organizations do → control spending



Misers = people who have trouble spending money (save everything)


Basic knowledge of dual systems
Kahneman → dual system of the brain:

System 1 / automatic system = fast and intuitive thinking, uncontrolled and
unconscious, effortless, associative, skilled

Brain activities in the automatic system are associated with the oldest
parts of the brain (lizard brain)

Gut reaction

We often make mistakes because we rely to heavily on automatic
thinking

System 2 / reflective system = slow and reflective thinking, controlled,
effortful, deductive, self-aware and rule-following

I used, e.g., when speaking a foreign language

Conscious though



Basic knowledge of heuristic mechanisms and biases: anchoring,
representativeness, availability, overconfidence, optimism, framing effects

Anchoring
Anchoring and adjustment heuristic = you start with some anchor, a number
you do know, and adjust in the direction you think is appropriate




W1: Introduction 3

, Bias occurs because the adjustments are typically insufficient and even
obvious irrelevant anchors creep into the decision-making process

Example: write down last 3 digits of phone number and then guess
whether a historical event happend before or after that

Anchors can influence how you think your life is going

Example: someone is asked to guess the population of Milwaukee; people
from Chicago are likely to make a high guess (based on their high anchor),
while those from Green Bay guess low (based on their low anchor)

Example: tip ‘15%, 20%, 25%, choose own amount’



Reactance = when people feel ordered around, they might get mad and do the
opposite od what is being ordered or suggested

Example: give no tip at all if the default amounts are ‘25%, 30%, 35%’

Evidence shows that, within reason, the more you ask for, the more you get
→ however, reactance shows that if you get greedy, you might end up with
nothing



Availability
Availability heuristic = people assess the likelihood of risks by asking how
readily examples come to mind

Example: because homicides are much more heavily reported in the news
media, they are more available than suicides, and so people tend to believe
(wrongly) that guns cause more deaths from homicide than from suicide

Accessibility and salience are important to how available information is; if
you personally experienced a serious earthquake, you’re more likely to
think a flood or earthquake is common than when reading about it in the
news

Recent events also have a greater impact on our behavior and fears than
earlier events do

The availability heuristic helps to explain risk-related behavior such as
buying insurance for natural disasters




W1: Introduction 4

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Summarized whole book?
Yes
Uploaded on
February 18, 2026
Number of pages
68
Written in
2025/2026
Type
SUMMARY

Subjects

$11.33
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
bel1234 Universiteit Utrecht
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
92
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
26
Documents
9
Last sold
1 week ago

4.0

7 reviews

5
2
4
4
3
0
2
1
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions