Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

2025 A-LEVEL EDEXCEL POLITICS ADVANCED PAPER 2 MARK SCHEME

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
43
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
19-02-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

2025 A-LEVEL EDEXCEL POLITICS ADVANCED PAPER 2 MARK SCHEME

Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Mark Scheme (Results)

Summer 2025

Pearson Edexcel GCE
In Politics

Paper 2: UK Government and Non-core
Political Ideas
(9PL0/02)

,Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications

Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK’s largest awarding body. We provide a
wide range of qualifications including academic, vocational, occupational and specific programmes for
employers. For further information visit our qualifications websites at www.edexcel.com or
www.btec.co.uk. Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the details on our contact us page at
www.edexcel.com/contactus.




Pearson: helping people progress, everywhere

Pearson aspires to be the world’s leading learning company. Our aim is to help everyone progress in
their lives through education. We believe in every kind of learning, for all kinds of people, wherever they
are in the world. We’ve been involved in education for over 150 years, and by working across 70
countries, in 100 languages, we have built an international reputation for our commitment to high
standards and raising achievement through innovation in education. Find out more about how we can
help you and your students at: www.pearson.com/uk




Summer 2025
Question Paper P77287A
Publications Code 9PL0_02_2506_MS
All the material in this publication is copyright
© Pearson Education Ltd 2025

,General Marking Guidance



• All candidates must receive the same treatment. Examiners
must mark the first candidate in exactly the same way as they
mark the last.
• Mark schemes should be applied positively. Candidates must
be rewarded for what they have shown they can do rather
than penalised for omissions.
• Examiners should mark according to the mark scheme not
according to their perception of where the grade boundaries
may lie.
• There is no ceiling on achievement. All marks on the mark
scheme should be used appropriately.
• All the marks on the mark scheme are designed to be
awarded. Examiners should always award full marks if
deserved, i.e. if the answer matches the mark
scheme. Examiners should also be prepared to award zero
marks if the candidate’s response is not worthy of credit
according to the mark scheme.
• Where some judgement is required, mark schemes will
provide the principles by which marks will be awarded and
exemplification may be limited.
• When examiners are in doubt regarding the application of the
mark scheme to a candidate’s response, the team leader must
be consulted.
• Crossed out work should be marked UNLESS the candidate
has replaced it with an alternative response.

, How to award marks when level descriptions are used
1. Finding the right level
The first stage is to decide which level the answer should be placed in. To do this, use a ‘best-fit’
approach, deciding which level most closely describes the quality of the answer. Answers can
display characteristics from more than one level, and where this happens markers must use the
guidance below and their professional judgement to decide which level is most appropriate.
For example, one stronger passage at L4 would not by itself merit a L4 mark, but it might be
evidence to support a high L3 mark, unless there are substantial weaknesses in other areas.
Similarly, an answer that fits best in L3 but which has some characteristics of L2 might be placed
at the bottom of L3. An answer displaying some characteristics of L3 and some of L1 might be
placed in L2.

2. Finding a mark within a level
After a level has been decided on, the next stage is to decide on the mark within the level. The
instructions below tell you how to reward responses within a level. However, where a level has
specific guidance about how to place an answer within a level, always follow that guidance.
Levels containing two marks only
Start with the presumption that the work will be at the top of the level. Move down to the
lower mark if the work only just meets the requirements of the level.
Levels containing three or more marks
Markers should be prepared to use the full range of marks available in a level and not restrict
marks to the middle. Markers should start at the middle of the level (or the upper-middle
mark if there is an even number of marks) and then move the mark up or down to find the
best mark. To do this, they should take into account how far the answer meets the
requirements of the level:
• If it meets the requirements fully, markers should be prepared to award full marks within
the level. The top mark in the level is used for answers that are as good as can
realistically be expected within that level
• If it only barely meets the requirements of the level, markers should consider awarding
marks at the bottom of the level. The bottom mark in the level is used for answers that
are the weakest that can be expected within that level
• The middle marks of the level are used for answers that have a reasonable match to the
descriptor. This might represent a balance between some characteristics of the level that
are fully met and others that are only barely met.

Indicative content
Examiners are reminded that indicative content is provided as an illustration to markers of some of the
material that may be offered by students. It does not show required content and alternatives should be
credited where valid.

Geschreven voor

Study Level
Publisher
Subject
Course

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
19 februari 2026
Aantal pagina's
43
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$6.89
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
RevisionKing7 Cambridge University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
345
Lid sinds
6 maanden
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
858
Laatst verkocht
2 uur geleden
The Revision King

4.2

61 beoordelingen

5
37
4
13
3
3
2
3
1
5

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen