Assignment 1 Semester 1 2026
Unique number:
Due Date: 18 March 2026
QUESTION 1: PAIA AND JUDICIAL ACCESS RIGHTS (2 ANSWERS PROVIDED)
The decision in Brümmer v Minister for Social Development and Others represents a
significant constitutional intervention in the enforcement of access to information rights under
section 32 of the Constitution.1 The Constitutional Court was required to determine whether
the 30-day period in section 78(2) of the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000
(PAIA) unjustifiably limited the right of access to information and the right of access to courts
under section 34.1 The judgment demonstrates how the Court reconciled the constitutional
imperative of openness with procedural discipline in litigation.
The Constitutional Framework
Section 32 of the Constitution guarantees everyone the right of access to information held by
the state.1 This right is foundational to South Africa’s constitutional democracy, which is
premised on accountability, responsiveness and openness.1 Access to information enables
citizens and the media to scrutinise state conduct and ensures transparency in public
administration.
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
, +27 81 278 3372
QUESTION 1: PAIA AND JUDICIAL ACCESS RIGHTS (2 ANSWERS PROVIDED)
The decision in Brümmer v Minister for Social Development and Others represents a
significant constitutional intervention in the enforcement of access to information rights
under section 32 of the Constitution.1 The Constitutional Court was required to determine
whether the 30-day period in section 78(2) of the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2
of 2000 (PAIA) unjustifiably limited the right of access to information and the right of
access to courts under section 34.2 The judgment demonstrates how the Court reconciled
the constitutional imperative of openness with procedural discipline in litigation.
The Constitutional Framework
Section 32 of the Constitution guarantees everyone the right of access to information held
by the state.3 This right is foundational to South Africa’s constitutional democracy, which is
premised on accountability, responsiveness and openness.4 Access to information
enables citizens and the media to scrutinise state conduct and ensures transparency in
public administration.
Section 34 guarantees the right of access to courts.5 This right ensures that constitutional
rights, including section 32 rights, can be effectively vindicated. Without meaningful
access to judicial remedies, constitutional rights risk becoming hollow.
PAIA was enacted to give effect to section 32.6 However, section 78(2) required an
unsuccessful requester to approach a court ―within 30 days‖ after an internal appeal had
failed.7 The issue in Brümmer was whether this time limit was constitutionally permissible.
The Procedural Limitation under PAIA
The applicant, a journalist, sought access to records relating to a government tender.8
After internal appeal procedures failed, he launched review proceedings outside the 30-
1
Brümmer v Minister for Social Development and Others 2009 (6) SA 323 (CC).
2
ibid paras 21–24.
3
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 s 32.
4
Constitution s 1(d).
5
Constitution s 34.
6
Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000 (PAIA).
7
PAIA s 78(2).
8
Brümmer (n 1) paras 6–8.
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is"
without any express or implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or
liability for any actions taken based on the information contained within this document. This document is
intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes. Reproduction, resale, or transmission
of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.