Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

PSYCH 253 MIDTERM 2 EXAM QUESTIONS ANSWERED CORRECTLY LATEST UPDATE 2026

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
3
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
07-03-2026
Written in
2025/2026

PSYCH 253 MIDTERM 2 EXAM QUESTIONS ANSWERED CORRECTLY LATEST UPDATE 2026 fake news - Answers prior exposure increases perception that it's true (laziness bias for susceptibility) bullshit receptivity - Answers positively correlated with both perceived accuracy of fake news & likelihood of sharing fake news via social media debunking conspiracy theories - Answers hard to talk abt them with friends/family — people who endorse already have lots of facts while the average person doesn't spend much time thinking about refuting them experiment: conspiracy theories - Answers - IV: treatment (3-round convo w/ AI abt fave conspiracy theory) & control (3-round convo w/ AI abt neutral topic) - DV: strength of conspiracy belief - outcome: treatment reduced strength of conspiracy belief by ~21% which persisted 2 months later objective inequality - Answers - financial risk taking: lottery, pay day loan - sexual risk taking: morning after pill, STD test - drug & alcohol risk: "how to pass a drug test", "how to get rid of a hangover" subjective inequality - Answers subjective well-being predicted by feelings than actual socioeconomic status — lower subjective status = more risk experiment: effects of subjective inequality - Answers - IV: participants outcomes in wagering game: low or high inequality - DV: perceived need ("what's the min. amt of money you'd need to win to feel satisfied?") & risk (probability of losing) - outcome: perceived need + risk taking higher in high inequality condition moral foundations theory — five core morals - Answers 1. care/harm 2. fairness/cheating 3. loyalty/betrayal 4. authority/subversion 5. sanctity/degradation (moral purity) moral foundations theory — four core arguments - Answers 1. nativism ("first draft" of moral mind) 2. cultural learning (first draft edited within culture) 3. intuitionism (intuitions first, strategic reasoning second) 4. pluralism (many recurrent social challenges in evolutionary history — many moral foundations) modules - Answers five foundations of MFT have corresponding locations in brain that make them distinct moral foundations theory — liberals vs conservatives - Answers American liberals: care + fairness American conservatives: all five theory of dyadic morality — agent vs patient - Answers - agent: does right/wrong - patient: receives right/wrong theory of dyadic morality — three points - Answers - morality — agent helping/harming patient - morality & mind perception linked - some kind of help/harm always perceived theory of dyadic morality — moral dyad - Answers - agency — capacity to intentionally act on & influence things - experience — capacity to feel things moral dumbfounding - Answers feeling that something is wrong but not able to explain why psychological emergence - Answers complex ideas (moral violations) can emerge from relatively simple cognitive processes (agent to patient) problem of purity - Answers - demonstrates evolutionary roots of morality (e.g. disgust = lack of purity evolved to protect bodies from pathogens but we feel disgust abt other things thus why stuff feels immoral - lots of papers invoke moral purity as important factor but only ~70% from last 10 years actually define it purity - Answers respect for God (51%), mental (15%), disgust elicitors (87%), spiritual (50%), pathogen avoidance (82%), sexual (79%), self-control (25%), general immorality (23%, natural order (55%) construct validity - Answers extent to which there's an association between measure + theoretical trait - issues can come from measure itself being bad or when the construct is poorly defined trolley problems - Answers originally philosophical intuition pump to explain utilitarian vs deontological thinking - situation 1: one side 5 workers vs one side 1 worker — ~90% would change to the 1 worker side - situation 2: 5 workers vs pushing 1 heavy guy — ~10% would push him utilitarian vs deontological - Answers - utilitarian — maximize pleasure, minimize pain - deontological — avoiding inherently immoral actions

Show more Read less
Institution
PSYCH 253
Course
PSYCH 253

Content preview

PSYCH 253 MIDTERM 2 EXAM QUESTIONS ANSWERED CORRECTLY LATEST UPDATE 2026

fake news - Answers prior exposure increases perception that it's true (laziness > bias for
susceptibility)
bullshit receptivity - Answers positively correlated with both perceived accuracy of fake news &
likelihood of sharing fake news via social media
debunking conspiracy theories - Answers hard to talk abt them with friends/family — people who
endorse already have lots of facts while the average person doesn't spend much time thinking about
refuting them
experiment: conspiracy theories - Answers - IV: treatment (3-round convo w/ AI abt fave conspiracy
theory) & control (3-round convo w/ AI abt neutral topic)
- DV: strength of conspiracy belief
- outcome: treatment reduced strength of conspiracy belief by ~21% which persisted 2 months later
objective inequality - Answers - financial risk taking: lottery, pay day loan
- sexual risk taking: morning after pill, STD test
- drug & alcohol risk: "how to pass a drug test", "how to get rid of a hangover"
subjective inequality - Answers subjective well-being predicted by feelings than actual socioeconomic
status — lower subjective status = more risk
experiment: effects of subjective inequality - Answers - IV: participants outcomes in wagering game:
low or high inequality
- DV: perceived need ("what's the min. amt of money you'd need to win to feel satisfied?") & risk
(probability of losing)
- outcome: perceived need + risk taking higher in high inequality condition
moral foundations theory — five core morals - Answers 1. care/harm
2. fairness/cheating
3. loyalty/betrayal
4. authority/subversion
5. sanctity/degradation (moral purity)
moral foundations theory — four core arguments - Answers 1. nativism ("first draft" of moral mind)
2. cultural learning (first draft edited within culture)
3. intuitionism (intuitions first, strategic reasoning second)
4. pluralism (many recurrent social challenges in evolutionary history — many moral foundations)
modules - Answers five foundations of MFT have corresponding locations in brain that make them
distinct
moral foundations theory — liberals vs conservatives - Answers American liberals: care + fairness
American conservatives: all five
theory of dyadic morality — agent vs patient - Answers - agent: does right/wrong
- patient: receives right/wrong
theory of dyadic morality — three points - Answers - morality — agent helping/harming patient
- morality & mind perception linked
- some kind of help/harm always perceived
theory of dyadic morality — moral dyad - Answers - agency — capacity to intentionally act on &
influence things
- experience — capacity to feel things
moral dumbfounding - Answers feeling that something is wrong but not able to explain why
psychological emergence - Answers complex ideas (moral violations) can emerge from relatively
simple cognitive processes (agent to patient)
problem of purity - Answers - demonstrates evolutionary roots of morality (e.g. disgust = lack of purity
evolved to protect bodies from pathogens but we feel disgust abt other things thus why stuff feels
immoral
- lots of papers invoke moral purity as important factor but only ~70% from last 10 years actually
define it
purity - Answers respect for God (51%), mental (15%), disgust elicitors (87%), spiritual (50%),
pathogen avoidance (82%), sexual (79%), self-control (25%), general immorality (23%, natural order
(55%)
construct validity - Answers extent to which there's an association between measure + theoretical
trait

Written for

Institution
PSYCH 253
Course
PSYCH 253

Document information

Uploaded on
March 7, 2026
Number of pages
3
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$11.49
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
joshuawesonga22 Liberty University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
107
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
1
Documents
14505
Last sold
1 week ago
Tutor Wes

Hi there! I'm Tutor Wes, a dedicated tutor with a passion for sharing knowledge and helping others succeed academically. All my notes are carefully organized, detailed, and easy to understand. Whether you're preparing for exams, catching up on lectures, or looking for clear summaries, you'll find useful study materials here. Let’s succeed together!

3.5

11 reviews

5
4
4
1
3
3
2
2
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions