PLS3701 Assignment 1 (QUALITY ANSWERS) Semester 1 2026

This document provides detailed workings, clear explanations, and well-structured solutions for the PLS3701 Assignment 1 (QUALITY ANSWERS) Semester 1 2026 - For assistance call or Whats-App us on 0.8.1..2.7.8..3.3.7.2.... Write a critical essay in which you analyse and compare Ifeanyi Menkiti’s and Kwame Gyekye’s views on the relationship between the individual and the community in African philosophy. Your discussion should demonstrate a clear understanding of their arguments concerning communitarianism and moderate communitarianism. Thereafter, explain the concept of autonomy in moral philosophy and evaluate how each thinker understands the role of individual autonomy within the community. Write a critical essay comparing Menkiti’s and Gyekye’s arguments about moral responsibility in African moral philosophy. Your discussion should explain how communal values influence moral judgement and accountability. Thereafter, examine how consequentialism and deontological ethics may interpret moral responsibility within the framework of African communitarian philosophy. Write a critical essay analysing the philosophical debate between Menkiti and Gyekye concerning the nature of personhood in African philosophy. Your discussion should demonstrate how their views differ regarding the relationship between individual rights and communal obligations. Thereafter, examine how human rights theory may be interpreted within their philosophical frameworks. Write a critical essay in which you analyse and compare the arguments advanced by Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre concerning freedom, responsibility and human existence. Your discussion should demonstrate a clear understanding of their respective positions and the philosophical assumptions that underpin them. Thereafter, provide a clear exposition of the main existentialist ideas studied in this course. Finally, relate each of these ideas to your analysis of Beauvoir’s and Sartre’s arguments, explaining how existentialism understands freedom and moral responsibility. Write a critical essay in which you analyse and compare the arguments advanced by Ifeanyi Menkiti and Kwame Gyekye concerning personhood and moral responsibility. Your discussion should demonstrate a clear understanding of their respective positions and the philosophical assumptions that underpin them. Thereafter, provide a clear exposition of the three normative ethical theories studied in this course. Finally, relate each of these theories to your analysis of Menkiti’s and Gyekye’s arguments, explaining how each normative related to their accounts of personhood and moral responsibility. Write a critical essay in which you analyse and compare the arguments advanced by John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant concerning moral duty and ethical decision-making. Your discussion should demonstrate a clear understanding of their respective positions and the philosophical assumptions that underpin them. Thereafter, provide a clear exposition of the three normative ethical theories studied in this course. Finally, relate each of these theories to your analysis of Mill’s and Kant’s arguments, explaining how each normative theory evaluates moral duty and ethical responsibility. Write a critical essay in which you analyse and compare the arguments advanced by Ifeanyi Menkiti and Kwame Gyekye concerning personhood and moral responsibility. Your discussion should demonstrate a clear understanding of their respective positions and the philosophical assumptions that underpin them. Thereafter, provide a clear exposition of the three normative ethical theories studied in this course. Finally, relate each of these theories to your analysis of Menkiti’s and Gyekye’s arguments, explaining how each normative related to their accounts of personhood and moral responsibility. Write a critical essay in which you analyse and compare the arguments advanced by Ifeanyi Menkiti and Kwame Gyekye concerning personhood and moral responsibility. Your discussion should demonstrate a clear understanding of their respective positions and the philosophical assumptions that underpin them. Thereafter, provide a clear exposition of the three normative ethical theories studied in this course. Finally, relate each of these theories to your analysis of Menkiti’s and Gyekye’s arguments, explaining how each normative related to their accounts of personhood and moral responsibility.Write a critical essay in which you analyse and compare the arguments advanced by René Descartes and David Hume concerning knowledge and scepticism. Your discussion should demonstrate a clear understanding of their respective positions and the philosophical assumptions that underpin them. Thereafter, provide a clear exposition of the main epistemological theories studied in this course. Finally, relate each of these theories to your analysis of Descartes’s and Hume’s arguments, explaining how each theory interprets the nature and limits of human knowledge.