only does things for his benefit, not caring about his actions' impacts on his colleagues and the
student fraternity at large. I am writing this letter to assure you that you are a person of great
integrity and happiness, a moral saint in whatever makes you happy-putting others' happiness
and well-being first before your own. I want to suggest that the life you are living and the things
you do for the sake of others' goodness is worth being emulated and praised.
First of all, I object Wolf's argument that agents of self-control do not have absolute control over
their normative actions, beliefs, and their selves. With the kind of integrity and selflessness you
have shown in the school to ensure that the students are well and safe, I strongly believe that you
did all those without any external influence. I know you executed these actions because you are
who you are from inside, that it is your character and beliefs as a person that drove you into
being you, and that is worth emulating.
Secondly, I object to the wolf's argument that moral saints are not attractive individual beings
and that they are no fun people, humorless and boring. That they cannot enjoy what is pleasant in
life and are too nice to only afford to be humorless or dull-witted and have no time for sports,
music, or literature. With the kind of support you had shown us, you allowed us to go for
entertainment every weekend and engage in sporting activities such as challenges with other
neighboring schools in our state. You have been among the cheering squad for the school's
football club and checked in during our entertainment hours on the weekend to ensure that
everything was okay. Surely these acts mean that you are among the few moral saints who are
more attractive than they can potentially be. These acts also help us learn that we do not have to
be less attractive and boring if we are moral saints.
Thirdly, I object to Wolf's (1980) argument that since moral saints have to make certain
sacrifices for others' good, sacrificing their good for the well-being of others, they suffer from
inside. She adds that the suffering is because these moral saints lack the qualities responsible for
living a happy life. I can use Plato and Aristotle's eudaimonistic ethics, that true happiness goes
in line with being morally perfect. The fact that you paid for several needy students' tuition fees
did not mean that you became financially unstable. During assembly meetings, you even told us
that we should take pride in sharing what we have with the less fortunate because we will have
more fulfillment from inside instead of suffering. And looking at you, I can see all that through
you.
In conclusion, So many students are gossiping about your selfless character when you correct
naughty students' behavior. Some even claim that you are exhibiting some actions and orders for
your selfishness, like getting more recognition by the ministry of education to be promoted to
higher posts in the education sector. Well, I am here to assure you that your actions are noble and
honest, and I believe in your leadership. I will also help the other naysayers realize the art of
being a moral saint and morally right so that nothing but a conducive learning environment exists
in the school and that students come out of the school better than they came in by emulating your
character and leadership.
Yours Respectfully,