Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Task 1|WGU D773 |Ethical Decisions Latest Updated A+ Score Guide

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
5
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
11-03-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

Introduction In my chosen scenario, I am a high school history teacher who found an online platform offering premade lessons and simulations that requires school approval because it collects student names, grades, and identification information. This immediately raises ethical concerns for me, especially since digital technologies can become normalized through convenience and rapid adoption even when ethical safeguards have not yet caught up (Western Governors University [WGU], 2024). According to WGU, such technological changes can cause conceptual disruption, challenging assumptions about privacy and classroom boundaries when external systems collect sensitive student information (WGU, 2024). A. Identify and Describe Ethical Dilemmas A1. One Ethical Dilemma with Two Opposing Options The ethical dilemma is whether to use the platform without school approval for instructional benefit even though it collects sensitive student information, or to wait for approval to ensure privacy protections are in place (WGU, 2024). Option 1: Use it immediately for convenience and improved instruction. However, WGU notes that disruptive technologies are often adopted incrementally before ethical implications, such as privacy and accountability, are fully addressed (WGU, 2024). Option 2: Wait for school approval. This supports responsible adoption by ensuring transparency, risk management, and appropriate boundaries before student data is shared (WGU, 2024). A2. How the Ethical Dilemma Affects Stakeholders Students: Students are directly affected because the platform collects their personal and academic data. WGU explains that digital technologies often blur public and private boundaries and can normalize data-driven participation over time (WGU, 2024). If student data is exposed or misused, it could cause harm.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

WGU D773 Task 1: Ethical Decisions (Latest
Updated)

Introduction

In my chosen scenario, I am a high school history teacher who found an online
platform offering premade lessons and simulations that requires school approval
because it collects student names, grades, and identification information. This
immediately raises ethical concerns for me, especially since digital technologies
can become normalized through convenience and rapid adoption even when
ethical safeguards have not yet caught up (Western Governors University [WGU],
2024). According to WGU, such technological changes can cause conceptual
disruption, challenging assumptions about privacy and classroom boundaries
when external systems collect sensitive student information (WGU, 2024).



A. Identify and Describe Ethical Dilemmas

A1. One Ethical Dilemma With Two Opposing Options

The ethical dilemma is whether to use the platform without school approval for
instructional benefit even though it collects sensitive student information, or to
wait for approval to ensure privacy protections are in place (WGU, 2024).



Option 1: Use it immediately for convenience and improved instruction. However,
WGU notes that disruptive technologies are often adopted incrementally before
ethical implications, such as privacy and accountability, are fully addressed (WGU,
2024).



Option 2: Wait for school approval. This supports responsible adoption by
ensuring transparency, risk management, and appropriate boundaries before
student data is shared (WGU, 2024).

, A2. How the Ethical Dilemma Affects Stakeholders

Students: Students are directly affected because the platform collects their
personal and academic data. WGU explains that digital technologies often blur
public and private boundaries and can normalize data-driven participation over
time (WGU, 2024). If student data is exposed or misused, it could cause harm.



Parents/Guardians: Families expect schools to protect student privacy and
maintain a safe learning environment. Bypassing approval could violate trust,
especially because digital systems can encourage convenience at the expense of
ethical considerations (WGU, 2024).



Teacher (me): Users of digital tools must be cautious about what data they input,
avoid exposing confidential information, recognize possible bias, and critically
evaluate outputs (WGU, 2024). Using an unapproved tool would conflict with
these professional responsibilities.



School/District: Schools are accountable for ensuring fairness, transparency, and
privacy protections when integrating new technologies. WGU states that
governance structures are necessary to balance innovation with public safety and
prevent misuse (WGU, 2024). If I adopt the tool independently, the school cannot
ensure compliance or oversight.



B. Apply an Ethical Framework to the Identified Dilemma

B1. Ethical Framework Applied: Deontology

Using a deontological approach, I focus on duties rather than convenience. My
responsibility is to protect student privacy, follow required school procedures, and
avoid foreseeable harm (WGU, 2024). Therefore, I choose Option 2: wait for
school approval.



This aligns with WGU’s expectations for responsible digital and AI use, always
respecting privacy, being aware of bias, evaluating accuracy and relevance, and

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
11 maart 2026
Aantal pagina's
5
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$10.00
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
Joy100 Rasmussen College
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
2662
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
2240
Documenten
3479
Laatst verkocht
1 dag geleden
Expert Minds

Hello, my documents are 100% guaranteed to help you Ace in your studies, my goal is to empower and help you in your career, i represent more professional nursing specialties and other courses. I'm a friendly person, don't hesitate to contact me. Good luck

4.1

381 beoordelingen

5
200
4
72
3
88
2
8
1
13

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen