UNL PHIL 106: final exam 2026 || Most Recent Exam 2026
-2027 Actual Complete Real Exam Questions And Correct
Answers (Verified Answers) Already Graded A+ |
Guaranteed Success!! Newest Exam | Just
Released!!
What is the argument from the absence of categorical reasons?
- ANSWER -1.
You have a reason to do something only if doing it serves
your desires
2. If there were objective moral requirements, you would
have reason to do
something even when it doesn't serve
your desires
C. There are no objective
requirements
What is the moral disagreement argument against moral
realism? - ANSWER -
1. There is a widespread disagreement about moral claims
2. And that disagreement isn't due to people lacking information
or thinking irrationally
3. If well-informed rational people disagree about some claim
then that claim cannot be true
C. moral claims cannot be objectively true
What is speciesism? - ANSWER -The discrimination against a
being simply because it is not a member of our own species ,
,even though it has capacities equal or superior to those of
some members of our own species
Why does Singer oppose the view that all human life is sacred?
- ANSWER Singer believes that when people say "all life is
sacred" they should compare the lives of severely and
irreparable mentally disabled human infants with the lives of
pigs, dogs, monkeys, and apes. He uses this argument to make
the reader think about why someone with very little mental
capabilities is worth more than an animal that has about the
same mental capabilities
Explain the argument from Marginal Cases - ANSWER -1. If it's
immoral to kill and eat mentally disabled human beings, and to
painfully experiment on them then it is immoral to treat non-
human animals the same way
2. It is almost always immoral to kill and eat mentally disabled
human beings and to painfully experiment on them
C. Therefore, it is almost always immoral to kill and eat animals,
and to painfully
experiment on
them
Possible reply to the argument from marginal cases: - ANSWER
-Humans are the kind of creatures who have special
characteristics and capacities even if not every human
possesses them. That sets us apart from other animals
, What point does Alastair Norcross make with the example of
Fred and the puppy mill? - ANSWER -It is morally wrong for
Fred to torture puppies in order to gain the ability enjoy
chocolate, then it is morally wrong for us to eat meat what is
produce by factory farming because those animals are being
tortured so we can enjoy meat
Arguments about why factory farming and torturing puppies
are not the same thing - ANSWER -1. Fred tortures puppies
himself (we do not torture the cows and chickens)
2. Fred is aware of the pain he causes (we don't know about he
pain caused)
3. Fred could make a difference by stopping (we can't make a
difference)
4. Fred intends to harm the puppies (We foresee, but do not
intend, the death of the cows and chickens)
Norcross believes that now that we are informed about the
torturing of animals that occurs with factory farming it is
morally impermissible to eat meat
Moral Agent - ANSWER -Subject to moral obligations, praise,
and blame
Moral Patient - ANSWER -Has interests that matter morally
What is retributivism? - ANSWER -A punishment is appropriate
if and only if the
person deserves it and to the extent that they
deserve it
-2027 Actual Complete Real Exam Questions And Correct
Answers (Verified Answers) Already Graded A+ |
Guaranteed Success!! Newest Exam | Just
Released!!
What is the argument from the absence of categorical reasons?
- ANSWER -1.
You have a reason to do something only if doing it serves
your desires
2. If there were objective moral requirements, you would
have reason to do
something even when it doesn't serve
your desires
C. There are no objective
requirements
What is the moral disagreement argument against moral
realism? - ANSWER -
1. There is a widespread disagreement about moral claims
2. And that disagreement isn't due to people lacking information
or thinking irrationally
3. If well-informed rational people disagree about some claim
then that claim cannot be true
C. moral claims cannot be objectively true
What is speciesism? - ANSWER -The discrimination against a
being simply because it is not a member of our own species ,
,even though it has capacities equal or superior to those of
some members of our own species
Why does Singer oppose the view that all human life is sacred?
- ANSWER Singer believes that when people say "all life is
sacred" they should compare the lives of severely and
irreparable mentally disabled human infants with the lives of
pigs, dogs, monkeys, and apes. He uses this argument to make
the reader think about why someone with very little mental
capabilities is worth more than an animal that has about the
same mental capabilities
Explain the argument from Marginal Cases - ANSWER -1. If it's
immoral to kill and eat mentally disabled human beings, and to
painfully experiment on them then it is immoral to treat non-
human animals the same way
2. It is almost always immoral to kill and eat mentally disabled
human beings and to painfully experiment on them
C. Therefore, it is almost always immoral to kill and eat animals,
and to painfully
experiment on
them
Possible reply to the argument from marginal cases: - ANSWER
-Humans are the kind of creatures who have special
characteristics and capacities even if not every human
possesses them. That sets us apart from other animals
, What point does Alastair Norcross make with the example of
Fred and the puppy mill? - ANSWER -It is morally wrong for
Fred to torture puppies in order to gain the ability enjoy
chocolate, then it is morally wrong for us to eat meat what is
produce by factory farming because those animals are being
tortured so we can enjoy meat
Arguments about why factory farming and torturing puppies
are not the same thing - ANSWER -1. Fred tortures puppies
himself (we do not torture the cows and chickens)
2. Fred is aware of the pain he causes (we don't know about he
pain caused)
3. Fred could make a difference by stopping (we can't make a
difference)
4. Fred intends to harm the puppies (We foresee, but do not
intend, the death of the cows and chickens)
Norcross believes that now that we are informed about the
torturing of animals that occurs with factory farming it is
morally impermissible to eat meat
Moral Agent - ANSWER -Subject to moral obligations, praise,
and blame
Moral Patient - ANSWER -Has interests that matter morally
What is retributivism? - ANSWER -A punishment is appropriate
if and only if the
person deserves it and to the extent that they
deserve it
