Assignment 2 Semester 1 2026
Unique number:
Due Date: April 2026
QUESTION 1 (3 DIFFERENT ANSWERS PROVIDED)
Ronald Dworkin’s objectivist theory explains that judges do not simply make law according
to personal preference, but are guided by objective standards found within the legal system
itself.1 He accepts that some cases are easy because one clear rule applies, and in those
matters the judge mainly identifies the rule and applies it to the facts.1
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
, For additional support +27 81 278 3372
QUESTION 1 (3 DIFFERENT ANSWERS PROVIDED)
Ronald Dworkin’s objectivist theory explains that judges do not simply make law
according to personal preference, but are guided by objective standards found within
the legal system itself.1 He accepts that some cases are easy because one clear rule
applies, and in those matters the judge mainly identifies the rule and applies it to the
facts.2 His theory becomes more important in hard cases, where more than one rule
may seem relevant or where the answer is not obvious from the text alone. In such
cases, the judge must decide which rule best fits the case by looking beyond narrow
wording to the principles that support the legal system.3 For Dworkin, law is not only
a collection of rules. It also includes deeper principles, values and standards that
have developed through the legal tradition, especially through precedent and earlier
judicial decisions. A judge must therefore interpret the law as part of a coherent
whole and choose the answer that best reflects the moral and legal structure already
present in that system.4 This means that judges are constrained by the tradition of
the legal system and cannot decide cases in an entirely free or personal way.
Dworkin’s view is called objectivist because he believes that the correct answer must
be discovered from legal materials and the principles underlying them, rather than
invented by the judge. In this way, judicial reasoning remains connected to the
broader integrity, history and accepted meaning of the law.5
OR
Ronald Dworkin’s objectivist theory explains that judges do not simply make law
according to personal feelings, but decide cases within the limits of the legal system
and its established tradition.6 He accepts that some matters are easy because one
clear rule applies, but he is mainly interested in hard cases where more than one
rule may seem relevant.7 In those difficult matters, the judge must do more than
choose freely. Dworkin argues that the judge must identify which rule best fits the
1
IJ Kroeze, Legal Philosophy: Only Study Guide for LJU4801 (University of South Africa 2017) 113.
2
ibid 118.
3
Ibid.
4
ibid 118–119.
5
ibid 114.
6
IJ Kroeze, Legal Philosophy: Only Study Guide for LJU4801 (University of South Africa 2017) 118.
7
ibid 118.