Assignment 2 Semester 1 2026
Unique number:
Due Date: April 2026
This document includes:
Helpful answers and guidelines
Detailed explanations and/ or calculations
References
Connect with the tutor on
+27 81 278 3372
, QUESTION 1 (2 ANSWERS PROVIDED)
Ronald Dworkin’s objectivist theory explains that judges do not decide difficult cases
by personal choice alone, but by working within the legal tradition of the system in
which they operate. In simple cases, the judge usually applies a clear rule to the
facts. In harder cases, where more than one rule may seem relevant or where the
answer is not obvious, the judge must look deeper into the law to find the best
answer.1 Dworkin argues that judges should not act as if the law is incomplete or as
if they are free to create new law from nothing. Instead, they must identify the rule or
principle that best fits the existing legal system and gives it moral coherence.2 This
means that legal principles matter just as much as legal rules. A judge must ask
which principle carries greater weight in the specific case and which interpretation
makes the law appear consistent, fair and rational.3 The answer is found in the
broader tradition of the legal system, especially past cases and accepted legal
reasoning. In this way, precedent and legal principle guide the judge and limit
personal discretion.4 Dworkin therefore sees adjudication as an interpretive task
where the judge must construct the most convincing understanding of the law as a
whole, rather than simply relying on literal wording or private opinion. His theory
remains objectivist because he believes the legal system itself contains standards
that constrain judges and direct them towards a justified answer in hard cases.5
OR
Ronald Dworkin’s objectivist theory explains that judges do not decide hard cases by
personal feeling or free choice, but by working within the legal tradition of the system
in which they serve.6 He accepts that some cases are easy because one clear rule
applies, but he says difficult cases arise when more than one rule may be relevant or
when the rule is not enough on its own.7 In such cases, the judge must look beyond
the bare wording of the rule and consider the legal principles that give the rule its
1
IJ Kroeze, Legal Philosophy: Only Study Guide for LJU4801 (University of South Africa 2017) 118.
2
ibid 118.
3
ibid 118–119.
4
ibid 119.
5
ibid 118–119.
6
IJ Kroeze, Legal Philosophy: Only Study Guide for LJU4801 (University of South Africa 2017) 118.
7
ibid 118.
© Study Shack 2026. All rights Reserved +27 81 278 3372