Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

NURS 5335 RESPIRATORY EXAM 2026/2027 | 100% Correct Answers with Complete Solutions | Graduate Nursing Advanced Assessment | Pass Guaranteed - A+ Graded

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
75
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
25-03-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

Excel in the NURS 5335 Respiratory Exam with this comprehensive 2026/2027 guide featuring 100% correct answers and complete solutions. This A+ Graded resource covers all key respiratory assessment domains including upper respiratory disorders (sinusitis, pharyngitis, laryngitis), lower respiratory disorders (pneumonia, bronchitis, COPD, asthma), pulmonary function testing interpretation, arterial blood gas analysis, chest imaging, and respiratory pharmacology (bronchodilators, corticosteroids, antibiotics). Each answer includes thorough rationales to reinforce understanding of pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and evidence-based management. Perfect for graduate nursing students seeking first-attempt success on their respiratory exam. With our Pass Guarantee, you can confidently achieve top scores. Download your complete NURS 5335 Respiratory Exam guide instantly!

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
NURS 5335
Vak
NURS 5335

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

NURS 5335 RESPIRATORY EXAM 2026/2027 |
100% Correct Answers with Complete Solutions |
Graduate Nursing Advanced Assessment | Pass
Guaranteed - A+ Graded



Domain 1: Upper Respiratory Tract Disorders (12 Questions)




Q1: A 28-year-old female presents with sneezing, clear rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and
itchy eyes every spring when pollen counts are high. She has no fever. Physical exam
reveals clear nasal discharge, boggy nasal turbinates, and conjunctival injection. Which
is the most appropriate initial pharmacotherapy?


A. Oral pseudoephedrine 60 mg every 4-6 hours


B. Intranasal ipratropium bromide 0.06% nasal spray


C. Intranasal fluticasone propionate 1-2 sprays per nostril daily


D. Oral amoxicillin 875 mg twice daily for 10 days


Correct Answer: C

,Rationale: This patient has seasonal allergic rhinitis (intermittent symptoms triggered by
pollen, classic allergic symptoms with itchy eyes and sneezing). Intranasal
corticosteroids (fluticasone) are first-line therapy for moderate-to-severe or persistent
allergic rhinitis per ARIA guidelines. They are most effective for nasal congestion and
provide relief within hours, with maximum benefit in 1-2 weeks.


●​ Option A is incorrect—Oral decongestants provide temporary relief but do not
address underlying inflammation; they are not first-line and have
cardiovascular/CNS side effects.
●​ Option B is incorrect—Ipratropium nasal spray is used for rhinorrhea-predominant
symptoms (particularly non-allergic rhinitis), not as first-line for allergic rhinitis
with congestion.
●​ Option D is incorrect—Antibiotics are inappropriate; there are no signs of
bacterial infection (no fever, purulent discharge, facial pain, or symptom duration
>10 days without improvement).




Q2: A 45-year-old male reports chronic nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, and postnasal drip
for 6 months. He denies seasonal pattern, sneezing, or itchy eyes. He uses
oxymetazoline nasal spray daily for 3 months. Physical exam reveals erythematous
nasal mucosa without polyps. Which diagnosis is most likely?


A. Seasonal allergic rhinitis


B. Rhinitis medicamentosa


C. Acute bacterial sinusitis


D. Vasomotor rhinitis

,Correct Answer: B


Rationale: Rhinitis medicamentosa is rebound nasal congestion caused by prolonged
use (>3-5 days) of topical decongestants (oxymetazoline, phenylephrine). The patient
has used oxymetazoline for 3 months, far exceeding the recommended duration. The
nasal mucosa appears erythematous (characteristic "beefy red" appearance).


●​ Option A is incorrect—Allergic rhinitis would have triggers, sneezing, and itchy
eyes; this is perennial without allergic symptoms.
●​ Option C is incorrect—Acute bacterial sinusitis requires purulent discharge, facial
pain/pressure, or symptoms >10 days without improvement; this is chronic
congestion.
●​ Option D is incorrect—While vasomotor rhinitis is non-allergic and could cause
these symptoms, the history of prolonged decongestant use makes rhinitis
medicamentosa the primary diagnosis.




Q3: A 32-year-old female presents with 8 days of nasal congestion, purulent nasal
discharge, facial pressure over the maxillary sinuses, and decreased sense of smell.
She had a viral URI 10 days ago that initially improved but then worsened. She has no
fever. Which management is most appropriate?


A. Amoxicillin-clavulanate 875/125 mg twice daily for 5-7 days


B. Amoxicillin 500 mg three times daily for 10 days


C. Supportive care with saline irrigation and intranasal corticosteroids


D. Levofloxacin 750 mg daily for 5 days

, Correct Answer: A


Rationale: This patient has acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) meeting
IDSA/AAO-HNSF criteria: symptoms >10 days without improvement, or
"double-sickening" (worsening after initial improvement). Amoxicillin-clavulanate is
first-line for adults due to S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae coverage, including
beta-lactamase producing organisms. Duration is 5-7 days for uncomplicated cases in
adults (shorter courses are effective).


●​ Option B is incorrect—Amoxicillin alone has high failure rates due to
beta-lactamase producing H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis; clavulanate is
necessary.
●​ Option C is incorrect—While supportive care helps, antibiotics are indicated for
confirmed bacterial sinusitis with "double-sickening" pattern.
●​ Option D is incorrect—Fluoroquinolones are not first-line for sinusitis due to
safety concerns (tendon rupture, neuropathy, QT prolongation); reserve for
beta-lactam allergy or treatment failure.




Q4: A 16-year-old presents with sore throat, fever 38.8°C (101.8°F), tender anterior
cervical lymphadenopathy, and tonsillar exudates. No cough is present. Rapid antigen
detection test (RADT) is negative. Which is the most appropriate next step?


A. Send throat culture and treat empirically with penicillin V


B. Send throat culture and await results before treating


C. Treat with azithromycin empirically

Geschreven voor

Instelling
NURS 5335
Vak
NURS 5335

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
25 maart 2026
Aantal pagina's
75
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$13.50
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
NurseTaliah Oxford University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
13
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
120
Laatst verkocht
1 week geleden
Writing and Academics (kianbiden907 at gmail dot com)

I offer a full range of online academic services aimed to students who need support with their academics. Whether you need tutoring, help with homework, paper writing, or proofreading, I am here to help you reach your academic goals. My experience spans a wide range of disciplines. I provide online sessions using the Google Workplace. If you have an interest in working with me, please contact me for a free consultation to explore your requirements and how I can help you in your academic path. I am pleased to help you achieve in your academics and attain your full potential.

Lees meer Lees minder
5.0

1 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen