Answers
Why is P/E is the worst multiple (3)? - answer-it includes non cash charges, is impacted
by tax rates, and is not capital structure neutral
Why don't we use FCF multiples even though they're more accurate than EBITDA or
EBIT multiples (2)? - answer-takes more time to calculate (convenience)
-may not be standardized because companies include different items in the CFO in the
SCF (comparability)
Book Value is another word for - answershareholders' equity
Why is P/BV less relevant now? - answercompanies are more service and IP oriented
than before (not reflected in the BS)
Multiple in retail, restaurant, and airlines - answerEV / ebitdar
You add back rental expense for comparability since some companies own buildings
and others rent them
Multiple in oil and gas - answer-ev / ebidax
used for comparability purposes because some companies capitalize explorational
expense whereas others expense it on their IS
-EV / proved reserves
-EV / daily production
Multiple in real estate (2) - answer-P / FFO (funds from operations)
-P / AFFO (adj funds from operations)
More accurate than P/E for reits since they add back depreciation (massive non cash
charge) and gains / losses
Multiple in internet companies (2) - answer-ev / unique users
-ev / pageviews
What does valuation mean? - answergives a RANGE of possible values; doesn't tell you
how much a company is worth
Public comps pros - answerBased on real data, not future assumptions
, Public comps cons (3) - answer-there may not be true comparables
-less accurate for thinly traded stocks or volatile companies
-market is emotional
precedent transactions pros - answerBased on what companies have ACTUALLY paid
for other companies
precedent transactions cons (2) - answer-there may not be true comparable
transactions
-data can be limited, esp. for private co. acquisitions
DCF pros (2) - answer-not as subject to market fluctuations
-theoretically sound since it's based on ability to generate cash
DCF cons (2) - answer-subject to far in the future assumptions
-less useful for fast-growing, unpredictable companies
liquidation valuation pros and cons - answerIgnores noise in the market but not useful
for most healthy companies
m&a premiums analysis pros and cons - answerBased on what companies have
actually paid but you can't use acquisitions of private companies (no stock prices)
future share price analysis pros and cons - answerTells you what the company might be
worth 1-2 years in the future, but bad because of it's dependence on assumptions
sum of the parts pros and cons - answerGood because more accurately values
diversified companies, but bad because you often lack specific info on each division
LBO analysis pros and cons - answerGood because it sets a floor valuation by
determine the max amount a PE firm would pay, but bad because it gives a low number
rather than a wide range of values
Impact on EBITDA of leasing vs owning buildings - answerLeasing buildings has rental
expense which lowers EBITDA (higher multiple).
Owning buildings has D&A which doesn't affect ebitda (lower multiple)
How to value a company with no profit? - answerRevenue multiples or cash flow based
multiples, but DCF may be relatively useless unless you can project far into the future
How to value a company with no revenue? - answer1) alternate metrics and multiples
like EV / unique visitors EV / pageviews
2) for biotech companies, you will create a far in the future, multi stage DCF (since
potential profits from a drug with a known market size are easier to estimate)