Page 1 of 135
Wisconsin Occupational Therapy Jurisprudence exam
ACTUAL EXAM COMPLETE QUESTIONS AND CORRECT
ANSWERS LATEST UPDATE THIS YEAR
SUMMARIZED EXAM COVERAGE (ALL CONTENTS COVERED)
Wisconsin OT jurisprudence focuses on whether an OT/OTA understands:
• How DSPS regulates OT practice
• Licensing rules, renewals, and CE compliance
• Scope of OT vs OTA duties
• Supervision and delegation limits
• Documentation and record retention standards
• Confidentiality, consent, and HIPAA-related obligations
• Mandatory reporting responsibilities
• Unprofessional conduct and disciplinary consequences
• Telehealth compliance and interstate practice issues
• Advertising, title protection, and credential integrity
, Page 2 of 135
50 MCQs (1–50) — Wisconsin OT Jurisprudence (Scenario-Based)
(Each ≥15 words, random order, exam-relevant, includes answer + rationale, continuous with no
skipping.)
Q1
A Wisconsin OTA independently completes a full initial evaluation and creates the treatment plan
without OT review. What is the most likely violation?
A. No violation if the OTA has experience
B. Practicing beyond OTA scope and failure to meet supervision requirements
C. Acceptable if the patient signs consent
D. Allowed if the OTA works in a rural clinic
Answer: B
Rationale: OTAs may assist with data collection but cannot independently evaluate or establish
treatment plans without OT oversight.
, Page 3 of 135
Q2
A Wisconsin OT renews their license but falsely attests they completed continuing education
requirements. What is the main legal concern?
A. No concern if they plan to take CE later
B. Fraudulent renewal application and unprofessional conduct subject to discipline
C. Acceptable if the OT has years of experience
D. Acceptable if CE requirements are unclear
Answer: B
Rationale: False attestation on licensure renewal forms is misrepresentation and can lead to serious
DSPS disciplinary action.
Q3
An OT documents a treatment session but intentionally leaves out a patient fall that occurred during
therapy. What is the legal concern?
A. No concern if the patient was not injured
B. Falsification or incomplete documentation and possible negligence exposure
, Page 4 of 135
C. Acceptable if the OT verbally informed the nurse
D. Allowed if the patient refused to report it
Answer: B
Rationale: Accurate documentation is required. Omitting significant incidents creates legal risk and may
be unprofessional conduct.
Q4
A Wisconsin OT posts a social media story about a “difficult stroke patient” including a recognizable
hospital room background. What is the concern?
A. No concern if the patient name is not used
B. Confidentiality breach risk and possible HIPAA violation due to identifiable information
C. Acceptable if the OT deletes the post later
D. Allowed if the OT is off-duty
Answer: B
Rationale: Identifiable details may reveal patient identity. Posting such content can violate
confidentiality laws and professional standards.
Wisconsin Occupational Therapy Jurisprudence exam
ACTUAL EXAM COMPLETE QUESTIONS AND CORRECT
ANSWERS LATEST UPDATE THIS YEAR
SUMMARIZED EXAM COVERAGE (ALL CONTENTS COVERED)
Wisconsin OT jurisprudence focuses on whether an OT/OTA understands:
• How DSPS regulates OT practice
• Licensing rules, renewals, and CE compliance
• Scope of OT vs OTA duties
• Supervision and delegation limits
• Documentation and record retention standards
• Confidentiality, consent, and HIPAA-related obligations
• Mandatory reporting responsibilities
• Unprofessional conduct and disciplinary consequences
• Telehealth compliance and interstate practice issues
• Advertising, title protection, and credential integrity
, Page 2 of 135
50 MCQs (1–50) — Wisconsin OT Jurisprudence (Scenario-Based)
(Each ≥15 words, random order, exam-relevant, includes answer + rationale, continuous with no
skipping.)
Q1
A Wisconsin OTA independently completes a full initial evaluation and creates the treatment plan
without OT review. What is the most likely violation?
A. No violation if the OTA has experience
B. Practicing beyond OTA scope and failure to meet supervision requirements
C. Acceptable if the patient signs consent
D. Allowed if the OTA works in a rural clinic
Answer: B
Rationale: OTAs may assist with data collection but cannot independently evaluate or establish
treatment plans without OT oversight.
, Page 3 of 135
Q2
A Wisconsin OT renews their license but falsely attests they completed continuing education
requirements. What is the main legal concern?
A. No concern if they plan to take CE later
B. Fraudulent renewal application and unprofessional conduct subject to discipline
C. Acceptable if the OT has years of experience
D. Acceptable if CE requirements are unclear
Answer: B
Rationale: False attestation on licensure renewal forms is misrepresentation and can lead to serious
DSPS disciplinary action.
Q3
An OT documents a treatment session but intentionally leaves out a patient fall that occurred during
therapy. What is the legal concern?
A. No concern if the patient was not injured
B. Falsification or incomplete documentation and possible negligence exposure
, Page 4 of 135
C. Acceptable if the OT verbally informed the nurse
D. Allowed if the patient refused to report it
Answer: B
Rationale: Accurate documentation is required. Omitting significant incidents creates legal risk and may
be unprofessional conduct.
Q4
A Wisconsin OT posts a social media story about a “difficult stroke patient” including a recognizable
hospital room background. What is the concern?
A. No concern if the patient name is not used
B. Confidentiality breach risk and possible HIPAA violation due to identifiable information
C. Acceptable if the OT deletes the post later
D. Allowed if the OT is off-duty
Answer: B
Rationale: Identifiable details may reveal patient identity. Posting such content can violate
confidentiality laws and professional standards.
