100% Correct Answers with Complete Solutions | Oregon
Legal & Regulatory Standards | Pass Guaranteed - A+
Graded
Domain 1: Professional Licensing and Scope of Practice (15 Questions)
Q1: A licensed professional in Oregon discovers their license will expire in 30 days.
According to ORS 676 and applicable board administrative rules, what is the correct
course of action to maintain legal practice authority?
A. Continue practicing until the expiration date, then apply for reinstatement after a
6-month lapse
B. Submit renewal application, pay fees, and complete all continuing education
requirements before expiration
C. Practice under a colleague's license until personal renewal is processed
D. Allow the license to expire intentionally to avoid renewal fees, planning to apply for a
new license later
Correct Answer: B [CORRECT]
Rationale: Under ORS 676.150 and standard board administrative rules across Oregon
licensing boards, licensees must complete renewal requirements before expiration to
maintain continuous legal authority to practice. This includes submitting the renewal
application, paying all required fees, and completing continuing education (CE)
,requirements as specified in OAR chapter rules (typically 30-40 hours biennially
depending on profession). Practicing with an expired license constitutes unlicensed
practice, a violation of ORS 676.160 (practicing without a license). Option A is incorrect
because reinstatement after lapse typically requires additional fees, documentation, and
possible disciplinary review. Option C constitutes unlicensed practice and
aiding/abetting unlicensed practice under ORS 676.165. Option D is fraudulent and may
result in denial of future licensure. Oregon does not provide grace periods for expired
licenses; practice must cease upon expiration if renewal is incomplete.
Q2: An Oregon-licensed professional wishes to practice via telehealth with a client
located in California. Under Oregon law and the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact
(IMLC) provisions applicable to Oregon, what is required?
A. Oregon license alone is sufficient because the professional is physically located in
Oregon
B. The professional must hold a valid license in California or meet California's telehealth
licensing requirements
C. The Oregon board's telehealth permit covers all interstate practice
D. Practice is permitted if the client is an Oregon resident temporarily in California
Correct Answer: B [CORRECT]
Rationale: Under Oregon law and general jurisdictional principles codified in ORS
chapters governing professional practice, licensure is required where the client/patient
is located, not where the provider is located. Oregon joined the Interstate Medical
Licensure Compact (IMLC) effective 2022 (ORS 676.800-676.815), which facilitates
,expedited licensure in participating states but does not eliminate the need for licensure
in the client's state. Option A reflects a common misconception; physical location of the
provider does not determine regulatory jurisdiction. Option C is incorrect—Oregon
boards do not issue permits that override other states' licensing requirements. Option D
may be permissible if the client maintains Oregon residency and the service is
considered Oregon-based, but this requires careful documentation and may not cover
all circumstances. The 2026/2027 updates emphasize that telehealth across state lines
requires compliance with both states' laws, and Oregon boards have increased scrutiny
of interstate telehealth practice.
Q3: A professional licensed in Oregon discovers an error in their original license
application regarding a minor criminal conviction from 10 years ago. Under ORS
676.303 and board disciplinary rules, what is the legally required action?
A. Ignore the error because the conviction was minor and occurred long ago
B. Immediately notify the licensing board in writing and provide corrected information
C. Wait until the next renewal cycle to disclose the information
D. Consult an attorney but take no action unless the board discovers the error
Correct Answer: B [CORRECT]
Rationale: ORS 676.303 requires licensees to notify their board within 30 days of any
change in information provided in the license application, including criminal convictions
or disciplinary actions in any jurisdiction. This ongoing duty of candor applies
regardless of when the underlying event occurred or its perceived severity. Failure to
disclose constitutes misrepresentation under ORS 676.150(4) and grounds for
, disciplinary action under ORS 676.310. Option A violates the duty of candor; boards
evaluate relevance, not applicants. Option C exceeds the 30-day notification
requirement. Option D delays required action; while legal consultation is prudent, it does
not excuse non-compliance. The 2026 updates emphasize that boards increasingly use
criminal background monitoring systems, making non-disclosure likely to be discovered.
Self-disclosure with explanation is generally viewed more favorably than board
discovery through other means.
Q4: Under Oregon law, a licensed professional's scope of practice is defined by which
authority?
A. The professional's employer determines scope based on facility needs
B. The Oregon Legislature through ORS and the licensing board through OAR define
scope
C. National professional associations establish binding scope standards in Oregon
D. Scope is determined by what other professionals in the state are doing
Correct Answer: B [CORRECT]
Rationale: In Oregon, professional scope of practice is established through statutory
authority (ORS chapters specific to each profession) and implemented through
administrative rules (OAR) adopted by the respective licensing boards under the
Administrative Procedures Act (ORS 183). While employers (Option A) may impose
additional restrictions, they cannot expand scope beyond legal authority. National
associations (Option C) provide guidance but lack regulatory authority in Oregon. Peer
practice (Option D) does not establish legal scope and may reflect unlicensed practice if