WGU C783 AHN1 TASK 2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
2026/2027 | Latest Update with Complete Solution |
Performance Assessment Guide | Pass Guaranteed - A+
Graded
Domain 1: Project Initiation and Charter Development (8 Questions)
Q1: A nurse leader is developing a project charter for implementing a new electronic
medication administration record (eMAR) system. Which component of the project
charter establishes the measurable criteria for project success and aligns with
organizational strategic goals?
A. Project scope statement defining all features and functions of the eMAR system
B. Goal statement with SMART objectives that specify expected outcomes and metrics
C. Risk register identifying potential implementation barriers and mitigation strategies
D. Stakeholder register listing all departments affected by the system change
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The goal statement in a project charter establishes success criteria using
SMART principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound). It defines
what the project will accomplish and how success will be measured—critical for
alignment with organizational strategy and Task 2 rubric requirements. For an eMAR
implementation, SMART objectives might include "Reduce medication administration
errors by 30% within 6 months post-implementation" or "Achieve 95% nurse compliance
with eMAR documentation within 3 months."
,Option A (scope statement) defines boundaries and deliverables but not success
metrics. Option C (risk register) is developed during planning, not initiation. Option D
(stakeholder register) identifies affected parties but doesn't establish success criteria.
According to PMBOK 7th Edition and WGU C783 rubric, the goal statement must
explicitly connect project outcomes to organizational priorities and provide measurable
targets for evaluation.
Q2: A healthcare organization is evaluating three quality improvement projects using a
weighted scoring model with criteria: Patient Safety Impact (40%), Financial Return
(30%), Implementation Feasibility (20%), and Strategic Alignment (10%). Project A
scores 9, 7, 6, 8; Project B scores 8, 9, 7, 9; Project C scores 7, 8, 9, 7. Which project
should be selected?
A. Project A with a weighted score of 7.7
B. Project B with a weighted score of 8.2
C. Project C with a weighted score of 7.8
D. Projects A and B are tied at 8.0
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: Weighted scoring model calculation:
● Project A: (9×0.40) + (7×0.30) + (6×0.20) + (8×0.10) = 3.6 + 2.1 + 1.2 + 0.8 = 7.7
● Project B: (8×0.40) + (9×0.30) + (7×0.20) + (9×0.10) = 3.2 + 2.7 + 1.4 + 0.9 = 8.2
[CORRECT]
● Project C: (7×0.40) + (8×0.30) + (9×0.20) + (7×0.10) = 2.8 + 2.4 + 1.8 + 0.7 = 7.7
Project B achieves the highest weighted score (8.2), driven by strong financial return
and strategic alignment despite slightly lower patient safety impact. Weighted scoring
models provide objective, transparent project selection that balances multiple
,organizational priorities—essential for healthcare capital allocation decisions where
patient safety, financial sustainability, and strategic positioning must be balanced. This
method appears in WGU C783 Task 2 as a standard project selection tool.
Q3: A nurse executive is conducting a cost-benefit analysis for a new patient fall
prevention program. Initial costs are $150,000 (implementation) plus $50,000 annually
(maintenance). Projected benefits are $200,000 annually from reduced fall-related
costs. What is the payback period?
A. 1.5 years
B. 2.0 years
C. 2.5 years
D. 3.0 years
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: Payback period calculation:
● Initial Investment: $150,000
● Net Annual Benefit: $200,000 (benefits) - $50,000 (maintenance) = $150,000
● Payback Period: $150,000 ÷ $150,000/year = 1.5 years [CORRECT]
The payback period measures time to recover initial investment from net cash inflows.
This rapid return (1.5 years) indicates strong financial viability for the fall prevention
program. In healthcare, payback periods under 3 years are generally acceptable for
quality improvement investments, though patient safety projects may be approved with
longer payback periods given liability and humanitarian considerations.
Option B incorrectly uses gross benefits without subtracting maintenance costs
($150,000 ÷ $200,000 = 0.75 years, not an option). Option C and D represent
, miscalculations or inclusion of irrelevant costs. Cost-benefit analysis and payback
period are required components of the business case in WGU C783 Task 2 project
charters.
Q4: Which element of the project charter explicitly defines the boundaries of the project
by stating what is included and excluded from project work?
A. Problem statement describing the current state and gap analysis
B. Scope statement with inclusions, exclusions, and boundaries
C. Assumptions and constraints affecting project execution
D. Deliverables list specifying tangible project outputs
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The scope statement is the charter component that explicitly establishes
project boundaries through three elements: (1) Product scope (features/functions of the
deliverable); (2) Project scope (work required to deliver the product); (3) Exclusions
(what is explicitly out of scope). For a healthcare project, this might specify: "In scope:
Implementation on Medical-Surgical units 3A and 3B. Out of scope: ICU, ED, and
outpatient clinics. Excluded: Hardware upgrades beyond specified tablets."
Option A (problem statement) establishes need but not boundaries. Option C
(assumptions/constraints) identifies factors affecting execution but doesn't define
scope limits. Option D (deliverables) lists outputs but doesn't establish work
boundaries. Scope definition prevents "scope creep"—a primary cause of healthcare
project failure where well-intentioned additions (extending to more units, adding
features) derail timelines and budgets. The WGU C783 rubric specifically evaluates
scope clarity and boundary definition.
2026/2027 | Latest Update with Complete Solution |
Performance Assessment Guide | Pass Guaranteed - A+
Graded
Domain 1: Project Initiation and Charter Development (8 Questions)
Q1: A nurse leader is developing a project charter for implementing a new electronic
medication administration record (eMAR) system. Which component of the project
charter establishes the measurable criteria for project success and aligns with
organizational strategic goals?
A. Project scope statement defining all features and functions of the eMAR system
B. Goal statement with SMART objectives that specify expected outcomes and metrics
C. Risk register identifying potential implementation barriers and mitigation strategies
D. Stakeholder register listing all departments affected by the system change
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The goal statement in a project charter establishes success criteria using
SMART principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound). It defines
what the project will accomplish and how success will be measured—critical for
alignment with organizational strategy and Task 2 rubric requirements. For an eMAR
implementation, SMART objectives might include "Reduce medication administration
errors by 30% within 6 months post-implementation" or "Achieve 95% nurse compliance
with eMAR documentation within 3 months."
,Option A (scope statement) defines boundaries and deliverables but not success
metrics. Option C (risk register) is developed during planning, not initiation. Option D
(stakeholder register) identifies affected parties but doesn't establish success criteria.
According to PMBOK 7th Edition and WGU C783 rubric, the goal statement must
explicitly connect project outcomes to organizational priorities and provide measurable
targets for evaluation.
Q2: A healthcare organization is evaluating three quality improvement projects using a
weighted scoring model with criteria: Patient Safety Impact (40%), Financial Return
(30%), Implementation Feasibility (20%), and Strategic Alignment (10%). Project A
scores 9, 7, 6, 8; Project B scores 8, 9, 7, 9; Project C scores 7, 8, 9, 7. Which project
should be selected?
A. Project A with a weighted score of 7.7
B. Project B with a weighted score of 8.2
C. Project C with a weighted score of 7.8
D. Projects A and B are tied at 8.0
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: Weighted scoring model calculation:
● Project A: (9×0.40) + (7×0.30) + (6×0.20) + (8×0.10) = 3.6 + 2.1 + 1.2 + 0.8 = 7.7
● Project B: (8×0.40) + (9×0.30) + (7×0.20) + (9×0.10) = 3.2 + 2.7 + 1.4 + 0.9 = 8.2
[CORRECT]
● Project C: (7×0.40) + (8×0.30) + (9×0.20) + (7×0.10) = 2.8 + 2.4 + 1.8 + 0.7 = 7.7
Project B achieves the highest weighted score (8.2), driven by strong financial return
and strategic alignment despite slightly lower patient safety impact. Weighted scoring
models provide objective, transparent project selection that balances multiple
,organizational priorities—essential for healthcare capital allocation decisions where
patient safety, financial sustainability, and strategic positioning must be balanced. This
method appears in WGU C783 Task 2 as a standard project selection tool.
Q3: A nurse executive is conducting a cost-benefit analysis for a new patient fall
prevention program. Initial costs are $150,000 (implementation) plus $50,000 annually
(maintenance). Projected benefits are $200,000 annually from reduced fall-related
costs. What is the payback period?
A. 1.5 years
B. 2.0 years
C. 2.5 years
D. 3.0 years
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: Payback period calculation:
● Initial Investment: $150,000
● Net Annual Benefit: $200,000 (benefits) - $50,000 (maintenance) = $150,000
● Payback Period: $150,000 ÷ $150,000/year = 1.5 years [CORRECT]
The payback period measures time to recover initial investment from net cash inflows.
This rapid return (1.5 years) indicates strong financial viability for the fall prevention
program. In healthcare, payback periods under 3 years are generally acceptable for
quality improvement investments, though patient safety projects may be approved with
longer payback periods given liability and humanitarian considerations.
Option B incorrectly uses gross benefits without subtracting maintenance costs
($150,000 ÷ $200,000 = 0.75 years, not an option). Option C and D represent
, miscalculations or inclusion of irrelevant costs. Cost-benefit analysis and payback
period are required components of the business case in WGU C783 Task 2 project
charters.
Q4: Which element of the project charter explicitly defines the boundaries of the project
by stating what is included and excluded from project work?
A. Problem statement describing the current state and gap analysis
B. Scope statement with inclusions, exclusions, and boundaries
C. Assumptions and constraints affecting project execution
D. Deliverables list specifying tangible project outputs
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The scope statement is the charter component that explicitly establishes
project boundaries through three elements: (1) Product scope (features/functions of the
deliverable); (2) Project scope (work required to deliver the product); (3) Exclusions
(what is explicitly out of scope). For a healthcare project, this might specify: "In scope:
Implementation on Medical-Surgical units 3A and 3B. Out of scope: ICU, ED, and
outpatient clinics. Excluded: Hardware upgrades beyond specified tablets."
Option A (problem statement) establishes need but not boundaries. Option C
(assumptions/constraints) identifies factors affecting execution but doesn't define
scope limits. Option D (deliverables) lists outputs but doesn't establish work
boundaries. Scope definition prevents "scope creep"—a primary cause of healthcare
project failure where well-intentioned additions (extending to more units, adding
features) derail timelines and budgets. The WGU C783 rubric specifically evaluates
scope clarity and boundary definition.
