Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Test Bank For Health Program Evaluation Using a Culturally Responsive, Racialized, and Equity Perspective Patricia B. Campbell , Veronica G. Thomas

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
150
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
02-04-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

This document contains a comprehensive test bank for Health Program Evaluation Using a Culturally Responsive, Racialized, and Equity Perspective by Patricia B. Campbell and Veronica G. Thomas. It includes a variety of exam-style questions covering program evaluation methods, health equity, cultural responsiveness, and racialized perspectives in public health. The material is designed to help students understand key evaluation frameworks and prepare effectively for exams. It aligns with important concepts in health program assessment and equity-focused practice.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Tests Bank For
Vak
Tests Bank For

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

chapter 1



Unanswered

Question 1 pts


What is one of the major goals of health program evaluation as described in the chapter?


➔ To improve public health and reduce health disparities


To increase funding for health programs


To promote political agendas in healthcare


To eliminate all health conditions




Unanswered

Question 2 pts


Health disparities are best defined as ______.


a set of evaluation standards used to judge program worth


the state in which everyone has a fair and just opportunity to attain their highest level of health


➔ systematic, plausibly avoidable health differences affecting socially disadvantaged groups


the conditions in which people are born, grow, work, live, and age




Unanswered

Question 3 pts


“The state in which everyone has a fair and just opportunity to attain their highest level of health” is the
CDC definition for ______.


➔ health equity


Social Determinants of Health (SDOH)


health disparities


social justice perspective




Unanswered

Question 4 pts


What does Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) refer to?

, A glossary of bolded terms provided at the end of the book


Clinically proven treatment regimens for chronic disease


Evaluation designs used to establish causality in health programs


➔ Non−medical factors and broader forces that shape everyday life conditions and affect health




Unanswered

Question 5 pts


Which of the following is one of the book’s cross−cutting themes?


Doing Evaluation in a Perfect World


➔ Using a Racialized Lens: Understanding Race and Ethnicity and their Role in Evaluation


Using the Deficit Model to Define Populations


Using Logic and Common Sense to Evaluate Programs




Unanswered

Question 6 pts


According to the chapter, the evaluation perspective used in the book brings together which three
components?


planning, implementation, and reporting/use of results


equality, efficiency, and evidence


➔ culturally responsive evaluation (CRE), a racialized lens, and a social justice perspective (SJP)


rigor, robustness, and reliability




Unanswered

Question 7 pts


A racialized lens in evaluation specifically calls attention to ______


geographic variation independent of social context


genetic differences as the primary explanation for health outcomes


participants’ racial diversity as the central driver of program success


➔ the ways race and ethnicity shape problem definitions, solutions, and access to opportunity

, Question 8 pts


Which of these practices best aligns with a social justice perspective (SJP) during evaluation?


masking inequalities to maintain neutrality and avoid controversy


avoiding engagement with communities to preserve evaluator independence


focusing solely on overall averages to simplify reporting


➔ documenting benefits and burdens of the project across groups and making disparities visible




Unanswered

Question 9 pts


Confirmation bias occurs when evaluators ______.


➔ seek or interpret information in ways that reinforce their existing beliefs


agree with a group to avoid social rejection or gain status


interpret information through the lens of the dominant culture’s values


attribute others’ behavior to internal character while excusing their own based on circumstances




Unanswered

Question 10 pts


What are implicit biases?


Consciously endorsed preferences and beliefs that can be readily communicated.


Negative social attitudes attached to a perceived deficiency.


Patterns of thinking (heuristics) that distort information processing and lead to errors.


➔ Unconscious mental processes that lead to automatic associations and reactions without intention.




Unanswered

Question 11 pts


Why does the chapter argue that objectivity in evaluation is a myth?


Because qualitative methods can never produce reliable findings as long as people are gathering the data


Because evaluators must avoid standards when judging merit and worth


Because evaluation never uses systematic data collection or analysis




, Because evaluation is a social practice of valuing that is shaped by perspectives such as race, gender, and
class




Unanswered

Question 12 pts


Which example best illustrates stereotype threat in a health or evaluation setting?


A reviewer uses the ACT UP framework to assess misinformation.


An evaluator organizes project tasks using a Gantt chart.



A team selects a logic model that identifies scenarios of de facto discrimination to describe their program theory.


➔ A patient underperforms on a diagnostic task due to concerns about confirming a doctor’s bias.




Unanswered

Question 13 pts


Which of the following is one of CDC’s six steps in the 2024 Program Evaluation Framework?


advance equity


➔ gather credible evidence


engage collaboratively


learn from and use insights




Unanswered

Question 14 pts


Which of the following is a key advantage of using an internal evaluator?


Guaranteed lower cost than an external evaluator.


➔ Familiarity with the project and staff, providing opportunities for informal feedback.


Greater perceived objectivity and credibility with funders than external evaluators.


Broader and more specialized expertise than external evaluators.




Unanswered

Question 15 pts


Which of the following is a key advantage of using an external evaluator?

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Tests Bank For
Vak
Tests Bank For

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
2 april 2026
Aantal pagina's
150
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$18.49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
StuviaGuides West Virgina University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
16176
Lid sinds
7 jaar
Aantal volgers
8362
Documenten
5972
Laatst verkocht
13 uur geleden
Accounting, Finance, Statistics, Computer Science, Nursing, Chemistry, Biology & More — A+ Test Banks, Study Guides & Solutions

As a Top 1st Seller on Stuvia and a nursing professional, my mission is to be your light in the dark during nursing school and beyond. I know how stressful exams and assignments can be, which is why I’ve created clear, reliable, and well-structured resources to help you succeed. I offer test banks, study guides, and solution manuals for all subjects — including specialized test banks and solution manuals for business books. My materials have already supported countless students in achieving higher grades, and I want them to be the guide that makes your academic journey easier too. I’m passionate, approachable, and always focused on quality — because I believe every student deserves the chance to excel.

Lees meer Lees minder
4.3

2292 beoordelingen

5
1569
4
305
3
183
2
74
1
161

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen