200 Multiple-Choice Questions with Detailed
Explanations
1. Contemporary use of the word forensic
a. Refers to ancient Roman law
b. Describes formal debates in a courtroom
c. Means psychological analysis of criminals
d. Refers to forensic science only
Answer: b
Explanation: The term "forensic" describes formal debate and argumentation in legal contexts. It
emphasizes courtroom discussion rather than purely scientific or psychological work. In modern
usage, it is associated with legal proceedings.
2. Forensic Psychology
a. Psychology applied only in criminal profiling
b. Psychology used exclusively in courtroom testimony
c. Any psychologist applying scientific knowledge to legal issues
d. Psychoanalysis of defendants
Answer: c
Explanation: Forensic psychology is the application of psychology to legal matters, including
research, assessment, and expert testimony. It is not limited to criminal profiling or court
testimony but spans multiple areas of practice.
3. McNaughten Rule
a. Determines age of criminal responsibility
b. Determines if defendant was insane at the time of the crime
c. Determines sentencing for felonies
d. Guides witness testimony
Answer: b
Explanation: The McNaughten Rule provides a legal standard for insanity. It assesses whether a
defendant knew their actions were wrong or understood what they were doing at the time of the
crime.
4. McNaughten Case
a. Introduced plea bargaining
b. Replaced “wild beast/man” insanity standards
c. Focused on juvenile sentencing
d. Limited expert testimony
Answer: b
Explanation: The McNaughten Case replaced outdated insanity standards with a cognitive test. It
evaluated the defendant's understanding of right and wrong rather than relying on vague ideas
like "wild beast."
,5. Who came up with the McNaughten Rule?
a. Supreme Court of the US
b. House of Lords/Queen Victoria
c. Sigmund Freud
d. Hugo Munsterberg
Answer: b
Explanation: The McNaughten Rule was established by the House of Lords during Queen
Victoria’s reign. It formalized legal procedures for the insanity defense in England.
6. Psychoanalysis
a. Uses cognitive-behavioral therapy exclusively
b. Focuses on unconscious urges through free association
c. Determines criminal guilt
d. Is primarily forensic assessment
Answer: b
Explanation: Psychoanalysis studies unconscious conflicts and urges. Through techniques like
free association, psychologists can explore motivations, which can sometimes inform legal cases.
7. Word Association Technique (Freud)
a. Measures IQ
b. Improves interviews by allowing people to reveal hidden thoughts
c. Evaluates witness credibility
d. Determines insanity
Answer: b
Explanation: Freud’s word association technique helps uncover unconscious thoughts and
motives. In forensic settings, it can be used to analyze responses, although it is not a legal
standard.
8. Hubris
a. Defensive legal strategy
b. Overselling one’s relevance or importance
c. Form of criminal negligence
d. A type of forensic assessment
Answer: b
Explanation: Hubris refers to exaggerated self-confidence or arrogance. In forensic psychology,
this can impact credibility and the perceived reliability of expert testimony.
9. Hugo Munsterberg
a. Father of cognitive psychology
b. Experimental psychologist, wrote On the Witness Stand
c. Invented lie detector tests
d. Focused on child psychology
Answer: b
Explanation: Munsterberg is considered the founder of forensic psychology. His work
emphasized the application of experimental psychology to legal issues, including eyewitness
testimony.
,10. On the Witness Stand (1908)
a. Advocated lie detectors in court
b. Studied eyewitness perception and identification
c. Developed modern jury selection
d. Focused on juvenile crime
Answer: b
Explanation: This book highlighted the limitations of human memory and perception. It
influenced how courts view eyewitness testimony and psychological evidence.
11. Criteria Based Content Analysis (CBCA)
a. Polygraph alternative
b. Distinguishes true from false victim statements
c. Measures IQ of defendants
d. Determines insanity
Answer: b
Explanation: CBCA evaluates verbal statements for credibility. It uses psychological criteria to
distinguish truthful from fabricated statements, especially in child abuse cases.
12. Jenkins v. US (1962)
a. Restricted psychologists from testifying in federal courts
b. Allowed PhDs to testify as expert witnesses
c. Applied the McNaughten Rule
d. Established forensic clinical training programs
Answer: b
Explanation: The ruling permitted psychologists with PhDs to serve as expert witnesses. This
expanded the role of psychology in legal proceedings.
13. Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
a. Applied forensic assessment in schools
b. Used social science data to challenge state actions
c. Focused on juvenile crime prevention
d. Determined competency to stand trial
Answer: b
Explanation: Social science research was used as evidence to end racial segregation in schools.
This set a precedent for using psychological research in legal decisions.
14. 1960s–70s Psychology-Law Research
a. Decline due to lack of funding
b. Increase in research, journals, and professional societies
c. Focused solely on clinical practice
d. Limited to child witnesses
Answer: b
Explanation: This period saw a surge in applied psychology in law. Funding and professional
organizations helped establish forensic psychology as a recognized field.
, 15. Tom Grisso
a. Founder of social psychology
b. Defined forensic psychology as a professional field
c. Developed the McNaughten Rule
d. Focused on jury selection only
Answer: b
Explanation: Grisso’s work clarified the scope of forensic psychology. He emphasized its
applications in assessment, treatment, and research for legal purposes.
16. Psychology Culture
a. Authoritative, adversarial
b. Creative, empirical, probabilistic
c. Legalistic and case-specific
d. Prescriptive and deterministic
Answer: b
Explanation: Psychology relies on research, theory, and probabilistic thinking. This contrasts
with the law’s focus on rules and case-specific decisions.
17. Law Culture
a. Probabilistic and experimental
b. Authoritative, adversarial, prescriptive
c. Collaborative and confidential
d. Focused on subjective experience
Answer: b
Explanation: Legal culture emphasizes formal procedures, authority, and adversarial debate. This
can clash with psychology’s empirical and experimental approach.
18. Lockhart v. McCree (1986)
a. Limited eyewitness testimony
b. Addressed death qualification in juries
c. Restricted expert witnesses
d. Reformed forensic psychology training
Answer: b
Explanation: This case confirmed the constitutionality of removing jurors opposed to the death
penalty. It highlighted concerns about jury bias in capital cases.
19. Death Qualification
a. Jury selection removing biased jurors for any reason
b. Procedure excluding jurors opposed to the death penalty
c. Selection of expert witnesses
d. Court-mandated psychological assessment
Answer: b
Explanation: Death qualification ensures jurors are willing to consider capital punishment.
Research shows it can inadvertently bias juries toward conviction.