Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

THL1501 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2026 (657810) - Due 24 April 2026

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
13
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
03-04-2026
Written in
2025/2026

Introduction to Theory of Literature - THL1501 Assignment 2 Semester 1 2026 (Unique Number: 657810) - Due 24 April 2026; 100 % TRUSTED workings, Expert Solved, Explanations and Solutions. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on ...(.+.2.5.4.7.7.9.5.4.0.1.3.2)........... THL 1501 ASSIGNMENT 02 Due date: 24 April 2026 Question 1: Unique number: 657810 In her book, Basic Issues in Aesthetics (1998), cited in the Study Guide, Marcia Eaton discusses the difficulties with defining the terms “beauty” and “aesthetics.” Referring to this excerpt, in an essay of 500-800 words, argue that it is possible for these terms to be used objectively despite arguments to the contrary. In other words, argue that it possible to define what “beauty” and “aesthetics” are. You may refer to the examples Eaton uses but can also provide your own. Include your references to the Study Guide both in-text and in a bibliography. Question 2: Compare the theories of New Criticism and Mukařovský’s Receiver Centered Theory by discussing the similarities and differences between them under the following headings: object of study, main hypothesis, theoretical terms, shortcomings (weaknesses) and explanatory value (strengths). Include your references to the Study Guide both in-text and in a bibliography. Question 3: Discuss the three fallacies of New Criticism by unpacking their theoretical frameworks in your own words while referencing the Study Guide. [30] [50] [20]

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

THL1501
ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1 2026

UNIQUE NO. 657810
DUE DATE: 24 APRIL 2026

, Introduction to Theory of Literature - THL1501

Question 1

The concepts of “beauty” and “aesthetics” have long been debated in philosophy,
particularly because they appear to depend on personal taste. Marcia Eaton, in Basic
Issues in Aesthetics (1998), highlights the difficulty of defining these terms due to their
subjective nature. However, despite these challenges, it is still possible to use “beauty”
and “aesthetics” in an objective way. This essay argues that although individual
preferences differ, shared standards, cultural frameworks, and observable qualities
allow for meaningful and objective definitions of these concepts.

One of the main arguments against objectivity in beauty is the common saying that
“beauty is in the eye of the beholder.” This suggests that what is beautiful varies from
person to person. Eaton acknowledges this difficulty, noting that aesthetic judgments
often involve emotional responses and personal interpretation (Study Guide, THL1501).
However, this does not mean that all judgments are entirely subjective or arbitrary. In
fact, people across different cultures and time periods often agree on certain aesthetic
qualities, such as symmetry, harmony, and balance.

For example, in visual art and architecture, symmetry is widely regarded as beautiful.
Classical Greek sculptures, Renaissance paintings, and even modern design often rely
on proportion and balance. These features can be objectively identified and analyzed.
Similarly, in nature, landscapes such as sunsets, mountains, or oceans are commonly
described as beautiful by many people. While personal preferences may vary, there is a
broad consensus that certain features evoke aesthetic appreciation.

Eaton also points out that aesthetic judgments are not made in isolation but are
influenced by cultural and social contexts (Study Guide, THL1501). This means that
while beauty may not be universally fixed, it is still shaped by shared standards within a
community. For instance, what is considered beautiful in fashion or art may differ across
cultures, but within each culture there are recognizable norms and criteria. These norms
provide a basis for objective discussion and evaluation.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
April 3, 2026
Number of pages
13
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$3.01
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
LIBRARYpro University of South Africa (Unisa)
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
10734
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
4904
Documents
5021
Last sold
7 hours ago
LIBRARY

On this page, you find all documents, Package Deals, and Flashcards offered by seller LIBRARYpro (LIBRARY). Knowledge is Power. #You already got my attention!

3.7

1497 reviews

5
699
4
247
3
248
2
80
1
223

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions