AIC 301 - final Exam Prep
Comprehensive Study Guide +
Exam Questions & Solutions
Graded A+
Professional Academic Assistance Services
Services Offered
• Proctored Exam Assistance
• Online Class Management (Full Course Support)
• Exam Preparation & Study Materials
• Assignments and Coursework Support
• Essay and Research Paper Writing
• Discussion Posts & Responses
• Editing and Proofreading
• Confidential Academic Consultation
Contact Information
Email:
WhatsApp link: https://wa.me/254704846336
Fast Response | Confidential | Reliable Academic
, Support
Helping Students Achieve Academic Excellence
The act of leaving a dangerous article such as a gun or car with
a person who the lender knows, or should know, is likely to use
it in an unreasonably risky manner is known as
Select one:
A. Negligent entrustment.
B. Contributory negligence.
C. Negligent supervision.
D. The dangerous instrumentality doctrine. - Answer: A.
Negligent entrustment.
There was a large unmarked sinkhole on Charlotte's property, a
short distance from a public road. One evening, a police officer
chased a mugger off the road and onto Charlotte's property.
Both the officer and the mugger fell into the hole and were
injured. Which one of the following best answers whether
,Charlotte is liable for the injuries to the police officer and/or to
the mugger?
Select one:
A. Charlotte is not liable to either the officer or the mugger,
because occupiers of land have no duty to correct defects
abutting sidewalks or streets.
B. Charlotte is liable to both the officer and the mugger,
because she had a duty to avoid endangering travelers with an
unguarded ditch.
C. Charlotte is not liable to the officer or the mugger, because
they were both trespassers on her property.
D. Charlotte is liable to the officer for the unguarded ditch,
because the officer was a licensee, but she is not liable to the
tres - Answer: D. Charlotte is liable to the officer for the
unguarded ditch, because the officer was a licensee, but she is
not liable to the trespassing mugger.
, Antonia was a life tenant who occupied a house at 33 Main
Street. Emil had a remainder interest in the property and
planned to occupy it after Antonia's death. Antonia obtained
property insurance covering the house, through Richley
Insurance Co. The house was destroyed by fire during Antonia's
life estate. Richley must pay the insurance policy proceeds to
Select one:
A. Emil, under the doctrine of equitable conversion.
B. Antonia, since she occupied the house at the time of the fire.
C. Antonia, because life tenants can recover the entire value of
the property that they insure.
D. Emil, because he will ultimately own the property. - Answer:
C. Antonia, because life tenants can recover the entire value of
the property that they insure.
Cristobal is in the process of purchasing a home from Leah.
They are in the executory period. This means that
Select one:
Comprehensive Study Guide +
Exam Questions & Solutions
Graded A+
Professional Academic Assistance Services
Services Offered
• Proctored Exam Assistance
• Online Class Management (Full Course Support)
• Exam Preparation & Study Materials
• Assignments and Coursework Support
• Essay and Research Paper Writing
• Discussion Posts & Responses
• Editing and Proofreading
• Confidential Academic Consultation
Contact Information
Email:
WhatsApp link: https://wa.me/254704846336
Fast Response | Confidential | Reliable Academic
, Support
Helping Students Achieve Academic Excellence
The act of leaving a dangerous article such as a gun or car with
a person who the lender knows, or should know, is likely to use
it in an unreasonably risky manner is known as
Select one:
A. Negligent entrustment.
B. Contributory negligence.
C. Negligent supervision.
D. The dangerous instrumentality doctrine. - Answer: A.
Negligent entrustment.
There was a large unmarked sinkhole on Charlotte's property, a
short distance from a public road. One evening, a police officer
chased a mugger off the road and onto Charlotte's property.
Both the officer and the mugger fell into the hole and were
injured. Which one of the following best answers whether
,Charlotte is liable for the injuries to the police officer and/or to
the mugger?
Select one:
A. Charlotte is not liable to either the officer or the mugger,
because occupiers of land have no duty to correct defects
abutting sidewalks or streets.
B. Charlotte is liable to both the officer and the mugger,
because she had a duty to avoid endangering travelers with an
unguarded ditch.
C. Charlotte is not liable to the officer or the mugger, because
they were both trespassers on her property.
D. Charlotte is liable to the officer for the unguarded ditch,
because the officer was a licensee, but she is not liable to the
tres - Answer: D. Charlotte is liable to the officer for the
unguarded ditch, because the officer was a licensee, but she is
not liable to the trespassing mugger.
, Antonia was a life tenant who occupied a house at 33 Main
Street. Emil had a remainder interest in the property and
planned to occupy it after Antonia's death. Antonia obtained
property insurance covering the house, through Richley
Insurance Co. The house was destroyed by fire during Antonia's
life estate. Richley must pay the insurance policy proceeds to
Select one:
A. Emil, under the doctrine of equitable conversion.
B. Antonia, since she occupied the house at the time of the fire.
C. Antonia, because life tenants can recover the entire value of
the property that they insure.
D. Emil, because he will ultimately own the property. - Answer:
C. Antonia, because life tenants can recover the entire value of
the property that they insure.
Cristobal is in the process of purchasing a home from Leah.
They are in the executory period. This means that
Select one:
