1
MSN 602 Discussion Board--Systematic Reviews
Vicki Goodman
NKU
MSN 602
10/3/2024
, 2
MSN 602 Discussion Board--Systematic Reviews
Provide a brief synopsis of what you learned from the document.
The document titled “Supplement A: Publication Bias in Systematic Reviews"
explores the risk of publication bias on the quality of systematic reviews. This writer learned
that publication bias arises when authors of these sources of evidence fail to publish studies
with negative findings. While the study results may not be significant to the publisher, they
may have profound practice implications. According to Polit and Beck (2021), some
publishers may only report the results if they support their hypothesis. This writer also
learned that some researchers intentionally disregard the null findings in an attempt to get
their articles published in renowned journals. By facilitating a false impression in systematic
reviews, their validity and reliability are considerably undermined. From the document, this
writer learned that authors have a professional and ethical obligation to the academic
community to publish high-quality systematic reviews regardless of the direction of the
findings.
Explain how you are planning to use systematic review to support your research.
The research project involves answering the PICOT question: “In adolescent patients
with attention deficit disorder (ADD) (P), does incorporating therapy sessions with prescribed
medication (I) for the incidence of depressive behavior versus without therapy (C) reduce the
likelihood of depressive behavior (O) in six months (T)?” To support the research, credible
evidence from systematic reviews would be valuable. Findings from existing studies on ADD
would be gathered by developing an effective search strategy. Polit and Beck (2021) submit
that a good search strategy should be explicit and detailed in a manner that could reproduce
the same methodology and similar findings. The approach will outline how relevant literature
on the condition will be identified, the databases to use, and a list of keywords. The databases
that will likely generate high-quality findings include PubMed Central, Medline Plus, and
MSN 602 Discussion Board--Systematic Reviews
Vicki Goodman
NKU
MSN 602
10/3/2024
, 2
MSN 602 Discussion Board--Systematic Reviews
Provide a brief synopsis of what you learned from the document.
The document titled “Supplement A: Publication Bias in Systematic Reviews"
explores the risk of publication bias on the quality of systematic reviews. This writer learned
that publication bias arises when authors of these sources of evidence fail to publish studies
with negative findings. While the study results may not be significant to the publisher, they
may have profound practice implications. According to Polit and Beck (2021), some
publishers may only report the results if they support their hypothesis. This writer also
learned that some researchers intentionally disregard the null findings in an attempt to get
their articles published in renowned journals. By facilitating a false impression in systematic
reviews, their validity and reliability are considerably undermined. From the document, this
writer learned that authors have a professional and ethical obligation to the academic
community to publish high-quality systematic reviews regardless of the direction of the
findings.
Explain how you are planning to use systematic review to support your research.
The research project involves answering the PICOT question: “In adolescent patients
with attention deficit disorder (ADD) (P), does incorporating therapy sessions with prescribed
medication (I) for the incidence of depressive behavior versus without therapy (C) reduce the
likelihood of depressive behavior (O) in six months (T)?” To support the research, credible
evidence from systematic reviews would be valuable. Findings from existing studies on ADD
would be gathered by developing an effective search strategy. Polit and Beck (2021) submit
that a good search strategy should be explicit and detailed in a manner that could reproduce
the same methodology and similar findings. The approach will outline how relevant literature
on the condition will be identified, the databases to use, and a list of keywords. The databases
that will likely generate high-quality findings include PubMed Central, Medline Plus, and
