Answers
1. If a municipality fails to provide adequate training for its police officers, what
legal consequences could arise based on the principles established in City of
Canton, Ohio v. Harris?
The municipality could be fined for negligence in hiring practices.
The municipality would only be liable if a crime was committed.
The municipality would be exempt from liability due to sovereign
immunity.
The municipality could face liability for violating individuals'
constitutional rights.
2. Which of the following describes reasonable suspicion to detain a person?
Officers were aware of specific facts that indicated criminal activity
was afoot.
Officers are seeking a witness to a nearby crime that just occurred
Officers have a reasonable belief that contraband or evidence of a
crime will be found on a particular person
Officers believe there is a fair probability that a particular suspect
committed or is committing a crime.
3. What legal principle was affirmed by the Supreme Court in Garrity v. New
Jersey?
Police officers have no rights during internal investigations.
Officers must always provide Miranda warnings before questioning.
All statements made by officers are admissible in court.
, Statements made under threat of job loss cannot be used against
officers in criminal proceedings.
4. If a police officer conducts an illegal search and finds a weapon, which of the
following statements is true regarding the weapon and any evidence found
as a result?
Only the weapon is admissible in court.
Both the weapon and any evidence derived from it are inadmissible
in court.
The evidence derived from the weapon is admissible, but the weapon
itself is not.
The weapon is admissible, but evidence derived from it is not.
5. Describe the purpose of the Predatory Offender classification system.
The classification is solely for juvenile offenders.
The Predatory Offender classification system is designed to rank
offenders based on their likelihood to reoffend.
It is used to determine the length of prison sentences.
The system categorizes offenders based on the severity of their
crimes.
6. The maximum fine for a gross misdemeanor is:
$1,000
$700
Whatever amount the court orders
$3,000
,7. Interpret the ruling of Pena v. Leombruni regarding the justification for using
deadly force by law enforcement officers.
Deadly force can be justified if the suspect presents an immediate
threat of serious harm, irrespective of their mental condition.
Deadly force is permissible when the suspect is fleeing.
Deadly force is justified when an officer feels personally threatened.
Deadly force is only justified if the suspect is armed.
8. What obligation does the prosecution have regarding evidence favorable to
the defendant as established in Brady v. Maryland?
The prosecution must disclose evidence favorable to the defendant.
The prosecution is not required to disclose any evidence.
The prosecution must present all evidence regardless of its relevance.
The prosecution can withhold evidence if it is not directly related to
the case.
9. Which of the following best defines the writ of habeas corpus?
It requires an incarcerated person to be brought before a judge for
an investigation of the restraint of that person's liberty.
It requires a lower court to submit the court record of its proceedings
in a particular case.
It requires that evidence obtained through illegal means not be used
at trial.
It requires that a minimum level of proof is necessary for conviction in
criminal trials.
, 10. The Code of Hammurabi represents the following as it relates to
criminology:
One of our first known bodies of law
Its emphasis was on retribution
It represents law that spoke to issues of theft, property ownership,
sexual relationships, and interpersonal violence
All of the answers
11. If a group of four individuals regularly meets to plan and commit thefts, how
would they be classified under the legal definition of a gang?
They would be classified as a criminal organization only if they have a
leader.
They would be classified as a gang.
They would not be classified as a gang because they do not have a
common name.
They would be classified as a social club.
12. In the In re Winship (1970) case, the questions was what the standard of
proof was for delinquency case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that:
due to the age of the offender, preponderance of evidence was
appropriate.
the adult standard of beyond a reasonable doubt was required.
clear and convincing evidence was sufficient.
judges have flexibility in the standard of proof that they use.
13. If a city decides to implement a new policing strategy based on the Kansas
City Preventive Patrol Experiment, what approach should they consider to