Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

340.721 Epidemiologic Inference in Public Health Exam Questions and Answers

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
18
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
19-04-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

340.721 Epidemiologic Inference in Public Health Exam Questions and Answers

Instelling
Epidemiology Course
Vak
Epidemiology Course

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

340.721 Epidemiologic Inference in Public
Health Exam Questions and Answers

Question 1
Which of the following statements is(are) true of using a less strict case
definition as compared to a more strict case definition? (SELECT ALL THAT
APPLY)

a. More individuals who truly are ill will be counted as cases
b. More individuals who truly are ill will be counted as non-cases
c. More individuals who truly are not ill will be counted as non-cases
d. More individuals who truly are not ill will be counted as cases

DESCRIBE THE STUDY POPULATION AT RISK

In addition to identifying a case definition, you must decide who to include in
your study. Ideally, you would obtain measurements on everyone who was at
risk of becoming ill.



Question 2
The term ‘at risk’ is defined as those individuals who are able become ill in
the same way. Which of the following groups can be considered ‘at risk’ in
this outbreak if we believe the outcomes are due to a food-related illness?


a. All members and their families
b. All members and guests who attended the luncheon
c. All members and guests who attended the luncheon and ate
d. All members and guests who attended the luncheon, ate, and
reported having symptoms




Recall that a questionnaire was prepared by the Health Department and
[1]

,distributed one week after the luncheon to all members and to as many
guests as possible in order to obtain clinical details of the illness. Table 1
summarizes the responses from members and from guests.


Table 1. Summary of Response to the Questionnaire for Members and Guests

Members Guests
Number of people to whom As many as possible
90
questionnaires were sent (Assume ~800)
Number of responses
86 67
from attendees
Number of responses from 85 67
attendees who ate
Number of people who 60 57
reported sore throat
Number of people who 41 48
reported sore throat and
fever
From Table 1, 90 members were asked to complete the questionnaire. 86
of those 90 members returned the questionnaire. The questionnaire
response rate for members is therefore:


Response rate = # of members that completed the questionnaire 86
= = 0.96, or 96%
# of members who were asked to complete the questionnaire 90




Question 3
What is the response rate for guests?

a. 8%
b. 46%
c. 72%
d. 85%



(NOTE: Are you wondering why you were asked to calculate the response
rate? Compare the response rate you calculated for guests in Question 3 to
the 96% response for members. Are they similar or different? What are
some possible reasons why?

[2]

, If you are unable to obtain measurements on everyone, a more practical
goal is to obtain measurements from a representative group of all the people
at risk of becoming ill. Based on the response rates, which group do you
think is more representative – members or guests?)




ATTACK RATES

The attack rate is an example of a measure of disease frequency. It is
calculated as the number of people at risk in whom a certain illness
develops divided by the total number of people at risk. Using a case
definition of sore throat and a study population that includes only ‘at risk’
members the overall Attack Rate in members is:


𝐴𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑘 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 = = # of members who attended the luncheon and ate and who then reported sore throat
60
# of members who attended the luncheon and ate
= = 0.706, 𝑜𝑟 70.6%
85




[3]

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Epidemiology Course
Vak
Epidemiology Course

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
19 april 2026
Aantal pagina's
18
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$18.49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
ALVINK2022 University of Oxford
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
255
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
157
Documenten
11126
Laatst verkocht
2 dagen geleden

4.3

90 beoordelingen

5
57
4
17
3
7
2
3
1
6

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen