New Jersey Police Sergeant Promotional Exam Actual
EXAM Questions and Correct Answers with
EXPLANATIONS LATEST THIS YEAR
New Jersey Police Sergeant Promotional Exam
Exam Coverage Summary
The New Jersey Police Sergeant Promotional Exam is administered by the New Jersey Civil Service
Commission (CSC) for municipal police departments under civil service jurisdiction . The exam is
designed to assess candidates' readiness for first-line supervisory roles, testing knowledge of New
Jersey criminal statutes (Title 2C), Attorney General Guidelines, case law (particularly Graham v.
Connor), supervisory and management principles, report writing/effectiveness of
expression, interpersonal relations/situational judgment, and departmental rules and regulations .
The application fee is $70 . Candidates must meet specific eligibility requirements, including continuous
permanent service and acceptable performance ratings . The final score combines written/oral
examination results with seniority credits (calculated from appointment date, minus time lost) and, for
municipal police, record of service (disciplinary suspensions up to five years before closing date) .
The West Caldwell Police Department provides an illustrative scoring breakdown: Written Examination
(up to 40 points), Oral Examination (up to 40 points), and Non-Examination Criteria such as seniority,
education, and merit (up to 20 points) . Candidates must achieve 70 total accumulated points to be
considered for promotion .
The Bernstein Test Prep promotional exam review course costs $695 (early registration) or $845 (regular
rate) .
Question 1
A sergeant is conducting a preliminary investigation into an officer-involved shooting. The officer states,
"I was in fear for my life; I had no choice." What is the sergeant's IMMEDIATE priority?
A) Determine if the department's use-of-force policy was violated
B) Separate the involved officer from other witnesses and secure the scene
, Page 2 of 155
C) Prepare a press release for the media
D) Notify the officer's union representative
Correct Answer: B
Summary Rationale: The immediate priority in any critical incident is scene security and the preservation
of evidence, which includes separating witnesses to prevent contamination of their accounts .
Question 2
A sergeant is reviewing a use of force report where an officer struck a combative subject twice in the jaw
with a closed fist. The subject was actively resisting arrest and had just kicked another officer. Which
legal standard is the PRIMARY benchmark for evaluating the reasonableness of this force?
A) The "least intrusive means" standard
B) The "objective reasonableness" standard under Graham v. Connor
C) The "probable cause" standard
D) The "strict scrutiny" standard
, Page 3 of 155
Correct Answer: B
Summary Rationale: Graham v. Connor (1989) established that claims of excessive force are judged
under the Fourth Amendment's "objective reasonableness" standard. This requires analyzing the facts
from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene .
Question 3
Mrs. Harrison has not paid her rent in three months; as a result, she was served with an eviction notice.
She became enraged, and in a fit of anger, recklessly kicked and damaged the bedroom and bathroom
doors. The property owner comes to the police department to sign complaints. According to the NJ
Code of Criminal Justice, which is the MOST APPROPRIATE advice for the property owner?
A) The matter is landlord-tenant and civil in nature and not within the power of the police
B) He should sign a criminal complaint for criminal mischief against Mrs. Harrison
C) No criminal charge can be signed, because she recklessly damaged the property without the
employment of fire, explosives, or other dangerous means
D) He should sign a criminal complaint for theft
, Page 4 of 155
Correct Answer: B
*Summary Rationale: Regardless of the landlord-tenant relationship, tangible property owned by the
landlord was damaged, which makes this a criminal case. Under N.J.S.A. 2C:17.3 Criminal Mischief, an
individual is guilty if they recklessly damage tangible property of another .*
Question 4
A police officer makes observations during a routine safety inspection of a commercial truck (tractor-
trailer) that reasonably leads him to believe it houses a hidden compartment containing contraband.
Must the officer obtain a search warrant before searching that compartment?
A) Yes, once the officer has probable cause to believe it has a hidden compartment, a search warrant is
required to further search that compartment
B) No, a search of an area of a commercial truck that is within the scope of a proper safety inspection
may be conducted without a warrant
C) Yes, the motor vehicle exception to the warrant requirement only applies to passenger vehicles
D) No, any inspection of a commercial vehicle may be conducted without any limitations