Laura Nash
Give this one a try later!
(1) Have you defined the problem accurately? (2) How would you define
the problem if you stood on the other side of the fence? (3) How did this
occur in the first place? (4) To whom and what do you give your loyalties as
a person and as a member of the corporation? (5) What is your intention in
making this decision? (6) How does this intention compare with the likely
results? (7) Whom could your decision or action injure? (8) Can you engage
the affected parties in a discussion of the problem before you make your
decision? (9) Are you confident that your position will be as valid over a
long period of time as it seems now? (10) Could you disclose without qualm
your decision or action to your boss, your CEO, the board of directors, your
family, or society as a whole? (11) What is the symbolic potential of your
action if understood? If misunderstood? (12) Under what conditions would
you allow exceptions to
,Appellant (or petitioner)
Give this one a try later!
The party who appeals a lower court's decision.
Ethical Egosim
Give this one a try later!
We all act in our own self-interest and limit our judgments to our own
conduct, not the conduct of others.
Moral Relativists
Give this one a try later!
Time-and-place ethics; making ethical choices based on the circumstances.
Derivative suit
Give this one a try later!
Lawsuit brought on behalf of another through the other's rights; for
example, a shareholder suing to enforce a corporation's rights.
, Complaint
Give this one a try later!
Pleading that outlines the plaintiff's allegations against the defendant and
the remedies sought.
"Toes to the Line" philosophy
Give this one a try later!
Doing no more than what is required under the law while violating the spirit
(or intent) of the law.
Categorical Imperative (Kant)
Give this one a try later!
One ought only to act such that the principle of one's act could become a
universal law of human action in a world in which one would hope to live
Default
Give this one a try later!
Give this one a try later!
(1) Have you defined the problem accurately? (2) How would you define
the problem if you stood on the other side of the fence? (3) How did this
occur in the first place? (4) To whom and what do you give your loyalties as
a person and as a member of the corporation? (5) What is your intention in
making this decision? (6) How does this intention compare with the likely
results? (7) Whom could your decision or action injure? (8) Can you engage
the affected parties in a discussion of the problem before you make your
decision? (9) Are you confident that your position will be as valid over a
long period of time as it seems now? (10) Could you disclose without qualm
your decision or action to your boss, your CEO, the board of directors, your
family, or society as a whole? (11) What is the symbolic potential of your
action if understood? If misunderstood? (12) Under what conditions would
you allow exceptions to
,Appellant (or petitioner)
Give this one a try later!
The party who appeals a lower court's decision.
Ethical Egosim
Give this one a try later!
We all act in our own self-interest and limit our judgments to our own
conduct, not the conduct of others.
Moral Relativists
Give this one a try later!
Time-and-place ethics; making ethical choices based on the circumstances.
Derivative suit
Give this one a try later!
Lawsuit brought on behalf of another through the other's rights; for
example, a shareholder suing to enforce a corporation's rights.
, Complaint
Give this one a try later!
Pleading that outlines the plaintiff's allegations against the defendant and
the remedies sought.
"Toes to the Line" philosophy
Give this one a try later!
Doing no more than what is required under the law while violating the spirit
(or intent) of the law.
Categorical Imperative (Kant)
Give this one a try later!
One ought only to act such that the principle of one's act could become a
universal law of human action in a world in which one would hope to live
Default
Give this one a try later!
