INTERMEDIATE ACCOUNTING I
EXAM 1 STUDY SET
University of Kansas | School of Business
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
50 Questions | Verified Solutions | 100% Correct | Graded A+
FASB Codification & GAAP-Aligned Format
Kieso, Weygandt & Warfield: Intermediate Accounting
ASC 606 Revenue Recognition | ASC 250 Changes & Errors
ASC 305 Cash | ASC 310 Receivables | ASC 330 Inventory
, EXAM STRUCTURE & INTRODUCTION
This KU ACCT 330 Intermediate Accounting I Exam 1 Study Set for 2026/2027 reflects the
standardized competency assessment used to evaluate proficiency in foundational intermediate
financial accounting principles for undergraduate business students at the University of Kansas.
The exam measures knowledge of the conceptual framework, financial statement preparation,
revenue recognition (ASC 606), time value of money applications, current asset accounting (cash,
receivables, inventory), accounting changes/error correction, and scenario-based financial
reporting decision-making essential for effective, GAAP-compliant practice in public accounting,
corporate finance, or advanced accounting studies. The standard KU ACCT 330 Exam 1 consists of
approximately 50 multiple-choice and computational questions aligned with FASB standards and
KU School of Business curriculum outcomes.
Total Questions: 50 multiple-choice, computational, and scenario-based questions
Testing Time: Approximately 75-90 minutes (computer-based or proctored written format via
KU Canvas)
Passing Score: Typically 70-75% required per University of Kansas School of Business policy
Calculator Policy: Non-programmable financial calculator typically permitted; verify with
instructor
Focus Areas: FASB Codification, GAAP application, financial statement analysis, ASC 606, time
value of money, accounting changes & errors
, Conceptual Framework & Financial Reporting Environment
6 Questions
Question 1
Which of the following is identified as a fundamental qualitative characteristic of
useful financial information in the FASB Conceptual Framework?
A. Comparability
B. Verifiability
C. Relevance
D. Timeliness
Correct Answer: C. Relevance
Rationale: The FASB Conceptual Framework (ASC 105) identifies two fundamental qualitative
characteristics: relevance and faithful representation. Relevance means the information can
make a difference in user decisions by having predictive value, confirmatory value, or both.
Comparability, verifiability, timeliness, and understandability are enhancing qualitative
characteristics that build upon the two fundamental qualities.
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
──────────────────
Question 2
Under GAAP hierarchy, which of the following represents the highest authority for
financial reporting standards?
A. FASB Technical Bulletins
B. AICPA Accounting Research Bulletins
C. FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
D. IFRS issued by the IASB
Correct Answer: C. FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
Rationale: The FASB Accounting Standards Codification is the single source of authoritative
U.S. GAAP for nongovernmental entities, established by FASB Statement 168 (2009). All other
sources (FASB Staff Positions, APB Opinions, AICPA Accounting Research Bulletins) are codified
within the ASC. IFRS is not authoritative for U.S. domestic reporting unless the SEC permits its
use. The Codification organizes accounting standards by topic (e.g., ASC 606 for Revenue, ASC
330 for Inventory).
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
──────────────────
Question 3
Which enhancing qualitative characteristic of financial reporting is best described as
the quality that allows users to identify and understand similarities and differences
between items?
A. Faithful representation
B. Comparability (including consistency)