Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

2026 Update OCR A Level Law H418-02 Law Making and the Law of Tort Verified Question Paper with Marking Scheme

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
36
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
28-04-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

The OCR A Level Law H418-02 Law Making and the Law of Tort Verified Question Paper with Marking Scheme is part of the OCR Law specification. It assesses students on the English legal system, law-making processes, and key principles of tort law including negligence and liability. This paper supports A Level revision and exam preparation through structured legal analysis and evaluation questions with official marking guidance.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

2025 OCR A 2025
Level OCR
Law H418-02
A 2025
Level OCR
Law
LawH418-02
Amaking
Level Law
and
Lawthe
H418-02
making
law ofand
Law
tortthe
Verified
making
law ofand
Question
tortthe
Verified
law
paper
ofQuestion
tort
with
Verified
Marking
paper
Question
with
Scheme
Marking
paper
Attached.pdf
with
Scheme
Marking
Attached.pdf
Scheme Attached.pdf




2025 OCR A Level Law
H418/02 Law making and the law of tort
Verified Question paper with Marking Scheme Attached



Oxford Cambridge and RSA


Tuesday 3 June 2025 – Afternoon
A Level Law
H418/02 Law making and the law of tort
Time allowed: 2 hours


You must have:
• the OCR 12‑page Answer Booklet




INSTRUCTIONS
• Use black ink.
• Write your answer to each question in the Answer Booklet. The question numbers must be
clearly shown.
• Fill in the boxes on the front of the Answer Booklet.
• Answer five questions in total:
Answer one question from Questions 1 and 2 and one question from Questions 3 and 4 in
Section A.
Choose one Part in Section B. Answer the three questions for that part.

INFORMATION
• The total mark for this paper is 80.
• The marks for each question are shown in brackets [ ].
• Quality of extended response will be assessed in questions marked with an asterisk (*).
• This document has 4 pages.

ADVICE
• Read each question carefully before you start your answer.




© OCR 2025 [603/0706/7] OCR is an exempt Charity
DC (WW) 353467/1 Turn over




2025 OCR A 2025
Level OCR
Law H418-02
A Level Law
LawH418-02
making and
Lawthe
making
law ofand
tortthe
Verified
law ofQuestion
tort Verified
paper
Question
with Marking
paper with
Scheme
Marking
Attached.pdf
Scheme Attached.pdf 4/28/2026

,2025 OCR A 2025
Level OCR
Law H418-02
A 2025
Level OCR
Law
LawH418-02
Amaking
Level Law
and
Lawthe
H418-02
making
law ofand
Law
tortthe
Verified
making
law ofand
Question
tortthe
Verified
law
paper
ofQuestion
tort
with
Verified
Marking
paper
Question
with
Scheme
Marking
paper
Attached.pdf
with
Scheme
Marking
Attached.pdf
Scheme Attached.pdf


2

SECTION A

Law making

Answer Question 1 or Question 2. Then answer Question 3 or Question 4.

Answer Question 1 or Question 2.


1 Describe overruling and reversing. [8]


2 Explain the controls exercised over delegated legislation by the courts. [8]



Answer Question 3 or Question 4.


3 Discuss the disadvantages of the Golden Rule of statutory interpretation. [12]


4 Discuss the disadvantages of the process by which an Act of Parliament is created. [12]




© OCR 2025 H418/02 Jun25


2025 OCR A 2025
Level OCR
Law H418-02
A Level Law
LawH418-02
making and
Lawthe
making
law ofand
tortthe
Verified
law ofQuestion
tort Verified
paper
Question
with Marking
paper with
Scheme
Marking
Attached.pdf
Scheme Attached.pdf 4/28/2026

,2025 OCR A 2025
Level OCR
Law H418-02
A 2025
Level OCR
Law
LawH418-02
Amaking
Level Law
and
Lawthe
H418-02
making
law ofand
Law
tortthe
Verified
making
law ofand
Question
tortthe
Verified
law
paper
ofQuestion
tort
with
Verified
Marking
paper
Question
with
Scheme
Marking
paper
Attached.pdf
with
Scheme
Marking
Attached.pdf
Scheme Attached.pdf


3

SECTION B

Law of tort

Choose Part 1 or Part 2.

Part 1

Answer the three questions.

The first two questions are about the scenarios. The scenarios are related.


Amir is a builder who was an employee of Bigbildz Construction. Bigbildz asked Amir to fit some upstairs
windows in a new house. Amir had to use scaffolding provided by Bigbildz to do the work. While Amir was
lifting the window into place, the scaffolding broke and he fell to the ground. He suffered serious injuries and
property damage. Investigations showed that Bigbildz had used sub‑standard scaffold boards to save money
and had not conducted a safety inspection of the scaffolding. Amir was unaware of this.


As a result of Amir’s fall, his £1000 mobile phone was broken beyond repair. He sustained serious leg injuries
and has been left with a permanent disability. Amir can no longer work as a builder and has been
unemployed since the incident. He used to earn £1000 a week. Amir also enjoyed playing amateur football
but can no longer play. Bigbildz claim that at the time of the incident, Amir was wearing his own trainers
instead of the work boots they provide. They suggest that his leg injuries would not have been as bad if he
had worn them.


5 Advise Amir whether Bigbildz would be liable if he sues them in negligence.
Do not discuss occupier’s liability, defences or remedies. [20]


6 Advise Amir what remedies he might expect if successful in his claim and whether Bigbildz has any
defences available. [20]


Essay question on the law of tort

7* Discuss whether the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 is fair on adult visitors. [20]




© OCR 2025 H418/02 Jun25 Turn over

2025 OCR A 2025
Level OCR
Law H418-02
A Level Law
LawH418-02
making and
Lawthe
making
law ofand
tortthe
Verified
law ofQuestion
tort Verified
paper
Question
with Marking
paper with
Scheme
Marking
Attached.pdf
Scheme Attached.pdf 4/28/2026

, 2025 OCR A 2025
Level OCR
Law H418-02
A 2025
Level OCR
Law
LawH418-02
Amaking
Level Law
and
Lawthe
H418-02
making
law ofand
Law
tortthe
Verified
making
law ofand
Question
tortthe
Verified
law
paper
ofQuestion
tort
with
Verified
Marking
paper
Question
with
Scheme
Marking
paper
Attached.pdf
with
Scheme
Marking
Attached.pdf
Scheme Attached.pdf


4

Part 2

Answer the three questions.

The first two questions are about the scenarios. The scenarios are not related.

Charlie owns a car repair garage on an industrial estate. When he replaces a car battery, he is supposed to
recycle the used batteries as they are. However, Charlie has been draining the acid from them into an old oil
drum outside his garage. He intends to use the acid as a weedkiller and pesticide in his garden at home. One
night some local teenagers are filmed on CCTV messing around outside the garage. One of them pulls the oil
drum of acid over. The acid runs into a neighbouring property where Dev operates a garden centre. His entire
stock of plants are killed by the acid.


Sam, Tom and Yana all work under a contract of service for Crowan Computers.

• Sam works on the customer service desk at Crowan Computers. A customer, Heidi, asks Sam a number
of questions and Sam responds rudely and aggressively ordering Heidi to leave the store. Sam follows
Heidi out to the car park and assaults her.

• Tom is the manager of Crowan Computers. Ivan works in the warehouse. After the staff Christmas
meal, Tom invites Ivan and a group of other employees back to his hotel for more drinks. An
argument develops between Ivan and Tom over differences in rates of pay. Tom becomes angry
and assaults Ivan.

• Yana works in the IT department at Crowan Computers. She is so angry about Ivan’s treatment that she
wants revenge. She uploads personal details of Crowan Computers’ customers on social media and is
charged with data protection and breach of confidence offences. One of the customers, Mia, now
wants to sue Crowan Computers for the breach of her personal data.


8 Advise Dev whether he will be successful if he sues Charlie in Rylands v Fletcher.
Do not discuss any remedies. [20]


9 Advise Crowan Computers whether they will be vicariously liable for the torts of Sam, Tom and Yana.
Do not discuss employment status or remedies. [20]


Essay question on the law of tort

10* Discuss whether the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 is fair on adult visitors. [20]



END OF QUESTION PAPER


Oxford Cambridge and RSA

Copyright Information
OCR is committed to seeking permission to reproduce all third‑party content that it uses in its assessment materials. OCR has attempted to identify and contact all copyright holders whose work is used
in this paper. To avoid the issue of disclosure of answer‑related information to candidates, all copyright acknowledgements are reproduced in the OCR Copyright Acknowledgements Booklet. This is
produced for each series of examinations and is freely available to download from our public website (www.ocr.org.uk) after the live examination series.
If OCR has unwittingly failed to correctly acknowledge or clear any third‑party content in this assessment material, OCR will be happy to correct its mistake at the earliest possible opportunity.
For queries or further information please contact The OCR Copyright Team, The Triangle Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8EA. OCR is part of
© OCR 2025 H418/02 Jun25


2025 OCR A 2025
Level OCR
Law H418-02
A Level Law
LawH418-02
making and
Lawthe
making
law ofand
tortthe
Verified
law ofQuestion
tort Verified
paper
Question
with Marking
paper with
Scheme
Marking
Attached.pdf
Scheme Attached.pdf 4/28/2026

Geschreven voor

Study Level
Publisher
Subject
Course

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
28 april 2026
Aantal pagina's
36
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$14.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
exam1 College
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
105
Lid sinds
10 maanden
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
340
Laatst verkocht
6 dagen geleden

3.8

12 beoordelingen

5
6
4
3
3
0
2
1
1
2

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen