Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

SPPH 381 A FINAL UPDATED ACTUAL Questions and CORRECT Answers

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
12
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
03-05-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

SPPH 381 A FINAL UPDATED ACTUAL Questions and CORRECT Answers

Instelling
Science
Vak
Science

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

SPPH 381 A FINAL UPDATED ACTUAL
Questions and CORRECT Answers
Public health ethics - CORRECT ANSWER The study of moral considerations in policies and
interventions that affect entire communities and populations. It focuses on the tension between individual
rights and collective benefit, and asks when it is acceptable to limit individual freedoms for the sake of
population health.



bioethics - CORRECT ANSWER The philosophical study of ethical issues arising from advances
in scientific and medical technologies. It focuses on individual-level decisions such as patient autonomy,
consent, organ donation, and the clinician-patient relationship



Biomedical Ethics (Clinical Ethics) - CORRECT ANSWER An approach to ethics that centers on
individual patients and the clinician-patient relationship. It emphasizes autonomy, informed consent,
beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice — but is considered insufficient on its own for population-level
public health decisions.



Principalist Framework - CORRECT ANSWER A foundational clinical ethics framework with four
principles: respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. Associated with Upshur
(2002) and Petrini (2010) as an example of clinical ethics being applied (with limitations) to public
health.



Nuremberg Code (1947) - CORRECT ANSWER A set of research ethics principles established
after the Nuremberg Trials. Key elements include: voluntary consent, anticipated scientific benefit,
benefits outweighing risks, animal experiments first, avoiding unnecessary suffering, no intentional death
or disability, subject's right to withdraw, and stopping if harm occurs.



Informed Consent - CORRECT ANSWER The ethical requirement to tell potential research
participants about all aspects of a study that might reasonably influence their decision to participate.
Violated in studies like the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.



Paternalism - CORRECT ANSWER An attitude or policy that overrides a person's own wishes
(autonomy) in pursuit of their best interests. Can be broken into soft and hard forms. Examples: helmet
laws, smoking bans, diet restrictions.

, Soft Paternalism - CORRECT ANSWER Intervention justified when a person's autonomy is
compromised (e.g., due to lack of information, impairment, or coercion). Applies to children, uninformed
individuals, or those in mental health crises. Widely considered ethically acceptable.



Hard paternalism - CORRECT ANSWER Intervention that overrides the choices of a fully
informed, competent adult. Examples include mandatory helmet laws or sugary drink restrictions for
adults. Ethically controversial because it conflicts with respect for autonomy.



Harm Principle (Mill) - CORRECT ANSWER The idea that state intervention in individual
behavior is only justified when that behavior harms others, not just oneself. A foundational concept in
liberal political philosophy applied to public health.



Least Restrictive Means - CORRECT ANSWER The principle that public health interventions
should infringe on individual liberty as little as possible. Governments should begin with the least
coercive approach and escalate only if lesser means fail.



Reciprocity - CORRECT ANSWER The principle that if individuals are burdened for the public
good, society owes them support in return (e.g., safe housing, food, basic necessities). An obligation on
social/public entities toward those who sacrifice for collective health.



Transparency - CORRECT ANSWER The principle that public health decision-making must be
open, publicly accountable, and clearly communicated to the people it affects.



Utilitarianism - CORRECT ANSWER An ethical framework that evaluates actions based on their
consequences — specifically, maximizing the greatest good for the greatest number. Useful for
population-level cost-effectiveness analysis but may sacrifice individual rights or fairness.



Deontological (Kantian) Ethics - CORRECT ANSWER An ethical framework focused on duties
and moral rules rather than consequences. Protects individual rights but is less suited to population-level
trade-offs where some individuals may bear burdens for collective benefit.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Science
Vak
Science

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
3 mei 2026
Aantal pagina's
12
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$12.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
MGRADES Stanford University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
1374
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
104
Documenten
84393
Laatst verkocht
1 dag geleden
MGRADES (Genius Brains)

Welcome to MGRADES Exams, practices and Study materials The work speaks for itself Me and my team will always make sure you get the best value from the exams markets. I offer the best study and exam materials for a wide range of courses and units. Make your study sessions more efficient and effective. Dive in and discover all you need to excel in your academic journey!

3.8

230 beoordelingen

5
94
4
50
3
51
2
14
1
21

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen