, PLEASE USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A GUIDE ONLY
Question 1
1. Read the excerpt below and answer the questions that follow:
1.1. Compare the central tenets of structural functionalism and modernisation theories in
relation to:
a) Society
Structural Functionalism views society as an integrated, stable, and harmonious system composed of
interconnected parts or institutions (such as the family, the economy, the political system, and
education). Each part performs specific functions that contribute to the overall stability and
equilibrium of the whole. Inspired by the organic analogy of Émile Durkheim and later developed by
Talcott Parsons, this perspective posits that social order is maintained through shared values, norms,
and consensus (Johannes Seroto et al., 2020). Change, when it occurs, is typically gradual and
adaptive, serving to restore equilibrium rather than to fundamentally transform the social structure.
Society is understood as a unified entity where institutions work in concert to reproduce social order.
In contrast, Modernisation Theory – while drawing heavily on structural-functionalist premises –
conceptualises society along a developmental continuum from "traditional" to "modern".
Modernisation theorists, such as Walt Rostow and Daniel Lerner, argued that all societies progress
through linear stages of development, moving from agrarian, subsistence-based, and status-oriented
traditional societies to industrialised, urbanised, and achievement-oriented modern societies
(Johannes Seroto et al., 2020). Unlike structural functionalism, which focuses primarily on social
stability and equilibrium, modernisation theory explicitly addresses social transformation. It
identifies a set of "traditional" characteristics (e.g., fatalism, ascriptive values, localised loyalties)
that must be overcome to achieve "modern" characteristics (e.g., rationality, individualism,
universalism, and national identity). Thus, while structural functionalism explains how societies hold
together, modernisation theory explains how societies move forward.
b) Education and development
Within Structural Functionalism, education serves two primary functions: socialisation and
selection/allocation. Firstly, education transmits shared norms, values, and skills from one generation
to the next, thereby fostering social integration and consensus. Secondly, education acts as a sorting
mechanism, selecting and allocating individuals to appropriate positions in the social and
occupational structure based on merit and achievement (a process known as "role allocation").
According to this view, educational qualifications are a rational and efficient way to match talent
with occupational demands, thereby ensuring that the most capable individuals fill the most
functionally important roles. Development, in this framework, is understood as the smooth
reproduction of the social order, with education providing the trained and socialised human capital
necessary for the continued functioning of all societal institutions (Johannes Seroto et al., 2020).
, Modernisation Theory extends the functionalist logic by explicitly positioning education as the
primary engine of national development and economic growth. Drawing heavily on Human Capital
Theory (associated with Theodore Schultz), modernisation theorists argue that investment in
education directly increases the productivity, skills, and adaptability of the workforce, which in turn
drives industrialisation, technological innovation, and higher per capita income (Johannes Seroto et
al., 2020). Beyond economic development, education is seen as the key instrument for transforming
"traditional" mindsets into "modern" ones. Schools are expected to instil values such as achievement
motivation, rationality, secularism, political participation, and national loyalty, thereby breaking
down parochial and kinship-based loyalties that impede modern state-building. The 1960s belief in a
"ceilingless" power of education to solve any social problem – from aggression to pollution – is a
quintessential product of modernisation theory. In essence, whereas structural functionalism views
education as maintaining society, modernisation theory views education as transforming traditional
societies into modern ones.
Summary Table:
Aspect Structural Functionalism Modernisation Theory
A linear continuum from
An integrated, stable system of
"traditional" to "modern"; society
View of Society interconnected parts working toward
undergoes progressive
equilibrium.
transformation.
Planned, directed change that moves
Nature of Gradual, adaptive change that
societies through stages of
Change restores social order and stability.
development.
Socialisation (transmitting shared Primary engine of economic growth,
Role of
values) and allocation (sorting workforce productivity, and
Education
individuals into occupational roles). modernisation of mindsets.
Education reproduces the existing
Education drives national
Education & social order by providing trained
development by increasing human
Development personnel and maintaining
capital and instilling modern values.
consensus.
Question 1
1. Read the excerpt below and answer the questions that follow:
1.1. Compare the central tenets of structural functionalism and modernisation theories in
relation to:
a) Society
Structural Functionalism views society as an integrated, stable, and harmonious system composed of
interconnected parts or institutions (such as the family, the economy, the political system, and
education). Each part performs specific functions that contribute to the overall stability and
equilibrium of the whole. Inspired by the organic analogy of Émile Durkheim and later developed by
Talcott Parsons, this perspective posits that social order is maintained through shared values, norms,
and consensus (Johannes Seroto et al., 2020). Change, when it occurs, is typically gradual and
adaptive, serving to restore equilibrium rather than to fundamentally transform the social structure.
Society is understood as a unified entity where institutions work in concert to reproduce social order.
In contrast, Modernisation Theory – while drawing heavily on structural-functionalist premises –
conceptualises society along a developmental continuum from "traditional" to "modern".
Modernisation theorists, such as Walt Rostow and Daniel Lerner, argued that all societies progress
through linear stages of development, moving from agrarian, subsistence-based, and status-oriented
traditional societies to industrialised, urbanised, and achievement-oriented modern societies
(Johannes Seroto et al., 2020). Unlike structural functionalism, which focuses primarily on social
stability and equilibrium, modernisation theory explicitly addresses social transformation. It
identifies a set of "traditional" characteristics (e.g., fatalism, ascriptive values, localised loyalties)
that must be overcome to achieve "modern" characteristics (e.g., rationality, individualism,
universalism, and national identity). Thus, while structural functionalism explains how societies hold
together, modernisation theory explains how societies move forward.
b) Education and development
Within Structural Functionalism, education serves two primary functions: socialisation and
selection/allocation. Firstly, education transmits shared norms, values, and skills from one generation
to the next, thereby fostering social integration and consensus. Secondly, education acts as a sorting
mechanism, selecting and allocating individuals to appropriate positions in the social and
occupational structure based on merit and achievement (a process known as "role allocation").
According to this view, educational qualifications are a rational and efficient way to match talent
with occupational demands, thereby ensuring that the most capable individuals fill the most
functionally important roles. Development, in this framework, is understood as the smooth
reproduction of the social order, with education providing the trained and socialised human capital
necessary for the continued functioning of all societal institutions (Johannes Seroto et al., 2020).
, Modernisation Theory extends the functionalist logic by explicitly positioning education as the
primary engine of national development and economic growth. Drawing heavily on Human Capital
Theory (associated with Theodore Schultz), modernisation theorists argue that investment in
education directly increases the productivity, skills, and adaptability of the workforce, which in turn
drives industrialisation, technological innovation, and higher per capita income (Johannes Seroto et
al., 2020). Beyond economic development, education is seen as the key instrument for transforming
"traditional" mindsets into "modern" ones. Schools are expected to instil values such as achievement
motivation, rationality, secularism, political participation, and national loyalty, thereby breaking
down parochial and kinship-based loyalties that impede modern state-building. The 1960s belief in a
"ceilingless" power of education to solve any social problem – from aggression to pollution – is a
quintessential product of modernisation theory. In essence, whereas structural functionalism views
education as maintaining society, modernisation theory views education as transforming traditional
societies into modern ones.
Summary Table:
Aspect Structural Functionalism Modernisation Theory
A linear continuum from
An integrated, stable system of
"traditional" to "modern"; society
View of Society interconnected parts working toward
undergoes progressive
equilibrium.
transformation.
Planned, directed change that moves
Nature of Gradual, adaptive change that
societies through stages of
Change restores social order and stability.
development.
Socialisation (transmitting shared Primary engine of economic growth,
Role of
values) and allocation (sorting workforce productivity, and
Education
individuals into occupational roles). modernisation of mindsets.
Education reproduces the existing
Education drives national
Education & social order by providing trained
development by increasing human
Development personnel and maintaining
capital and instilling modern values.
consensus.
