Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

AUE2601 Exam Revision May/June Past Papers & Answers 2026 |Auditing Theory and Practice |

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
21
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
07-05-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

This exam revision paper is more than just a set of questions and answers. It’s designed to help you understand how each answer is reached, so you’re not just memorising but actually learning the concepts behind them. The solutions are clear, accurate, and supported by reliable academic references. It also includes predicted questions that are likely to appear, giving you a practical sense of what to expect and how to approach them with confidence. Whether you’re revising last minute or using it to strengthen your understanding over time, it’s structured in a way that aligns with what examiners look for. The explanations are straightforward and focused, making it easier to follow and apply. If you take the time to work through it properly, achieving high grades is a realistic outcome.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud


]]
‡ ⋆


=============================================================

AUE2601: Auditing Theory and Practice
May/June Examination 2026 — Comprehensive Revision Guide
Based on May/June 2025 & May/June 2024 Exam Patterns

⋆ ⋄ ⋆ ⋄ ⋆ ⋄ ⋆ ⋄ ⋆

[ Auditing & Assurance — UNISA [




_ Exam Revision Guide


AUE2601
Module Code:
Auditing Theory and Practice
Module Name:
May/June 2025 & May/June 2024
Exam Papers:
May/June 2026 Examination
Prepared for:
100 marks (typical paper)
Total Marks:
2 hours
Duration:


Covers all major topics: auditing theory, Companies Act, ethics, assurance engage-
ments, audit risk, planning, and evidence.




‡ Exam Revision Notes | AUE2601 | 2026

,AUE2601 | Exam Revision Auditing Theory & Practice



Question 1 [25] marks


(a) [10] marks


Question: In your auditing studies and practice you will frequently encounter the follow-
ing terms. Briefly explain each term as it applies to the external audit environment:

(i) Auditee
(ii) Audit independence
(iii) Professional scepticism
(iv) Professional competence
(v) Audit evidence
(vi) Reasonable assurance
(vii) Postulates of auditing
(viii) Audit committee
(ix) Registered auditor (RA)
(x) Expectation gap


Answer:

(i) Auditee: The entity that is subject to the audit. In external audit, it is the client
company; in internal audit, it may be a department or division within the organisa-
tion.
(ii) Audit independence: The defining characteristic of the audit function that gives
the audit opinion its value. The auditor must be independent in both fact (actual
independence) and appearance (perceived independence) from the auditee. Without
independence, the audit opinion carries no credibility.
(iii) Professional scepticism: An attitude requiring the auditor not to accept state-
ments at face value. The auditor maintains a questioning mind, critically assessing
evidence and remaining alert to conditions suggesting possible misstatement due to
error or fraud (ISA 200).
(iv) Professional competence: A fundamental ethical principle requiring auditors
to maintain their knowledge and skill at the level needed to deliver competent pro-
fessional services, applying current technical and professional standards diligently
(SAICA Code).
(v) Audit evidence: The information the auditor gathers to support the audit opinion.
Evidence must be both sufficient (enough quantity) and appropriate (relevant and




Page 2 of 21 ‡

, AUE2601 | Exam Revision Auditing Theory & Practice



reliable) to form a reasonable basis for the opinion (ISA 500).
(vi) Reasonable assurance: A high but not absolute level of assurance that the fi-
nancial statements are free from material misstatement. It is the level of assurance
provided by an external audit (ISA 200).
(vii) Postulates of auditing: The basic foundational assumptions on which the dis-
cipline of auditing rests. Examples include the assumption that financial data is
verifiable and that the auditor acts only in the capacity of an auditor.
(viii) Audit committee: A sub-committee of the board of directors, comprising in-
dependent non-executive directors, that oversees internal audit, external audit
appointments, financial reporting integrity, and risk management. Required for
public companies and certain state-owned entities under the Companies Act.
(ix) Registered auditor (RA): A person registered with the Independent Regulatory
Board for Auditors (IRBA) in terms of the Auditing Profession Act 26 of 2005, who
is authorised to perform statutory audits in South Africa.
(x) Expectation gap: The difference between what the public believes auditors do
(e.g., detect all fraud, guarantee accuracy) and what auditors actually do (provide
reasonable assurance on fair presentation). Closing this gap requires better public
education about the audit’s limitations.



(b) [8] marks


Question: Green-Harvest Ltd is a medium-sized agricultural company that sells vegeta-
bles locally and internationally. It has 45 employees, a turnover of R52 million, liabilities
to third parties of R8.5 million, and 6 shareholders. Calculate the company’s Public Inter-
est Score (PIS) and advise whether it is required to have its financial statements audited
or independently reviewed. Provide full reasons. (8)


Answer:
Public Interest Score (PIS) Calculation (Regulation 26, Companies Act 71 of
2008):




Page 3 of 21 ‡

Gekoppeld boek

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
7 mei 2026
Aantal pagina's
21
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$3.51
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
LectureLab Teachme2-tutor
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
647
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
188
Documenten
1431
Laatst verkocht
1 dag geleden
LectureLab

LectureLab: Crafted Clarity for Academic Success Welcome to LectureLab, your go-to source for clear, concise, and expertly crafted lecture notes. Designed to simplify complex topics and boost your grades, our study materials turn lectures into actionable insights. Whether you’re prepping for exams or mastering coursework, LectureLab empowers your learning journey. Explore our resources and ace your studies today!

3.6

83 beoordelingen

5
32
4
16
3
16
2
4
1
15

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen