Army Regulation 600-52 Compliance Assessment
SHARP — Sexual Harassment/Assault Response and Prevention
Comprehensive Practice Examination
2026/2027 Academic Year
Total Questions: 50
Question Types: Multiple-Choice, SATA, Scenario-Based
Testing Time: 60–90 minutes (ALMS / Proctored)
Passing Score: 80% (40/50 correct)
Certification Validity: Annual Refresher per AR 600-52, Para 7-2
Domains: 10 Core SHARP Program Areas
Verified Correct Answers | Complete Marking Scheme | A+ Study Guide
, SECTION I: SHARP Program Foundations (AR 600-52 Overview)
1. Army Regulation 600-52, dated 11 February 2025, represents which milestone in the Army’s
SHARP Program?
A. The first DA-level policy addressing sexual harassment in the Army
B. The first stand-alone Army regulation dedicated exclusively to the SHARP Program,
replacing AR 600-20 Chapters 7 and 8
C. A temporary guidance document that supplements AR 600-20
D. A Department of Defense directive applicable to all military branches
Rationale: AR 600-52, promulgated on 11 February 2025, is the first stand-alone Army regulation
dedicated entirely to the Sexual Harassment/Assault Response and Prevention Program. It supersedes
and replaces the SHARP-related provisions previously contained in AR 600-20 (Chapters 7 and 8),
consolidating all SHARP policy, responsibilities, and procedures into a single authoritative regulatory
document. This consolidation improves accessibility, clarity, and enforcement of SHARP program
requirements across all Army components.
2. The primary goal of the Army SHARP Program is to:
A. Prosecute all reported incidents regardless of evidence
B. Create a culture free of sexual harassment, sexual assault, and associated retaliation
that degrades readiness and mission effectiveness
C. Eliminate all interpersonal relationships within the military
D. Transfer SHARP responsibilities to civilian law enforcement agencies
Rationale: The Army SHARP Program’s foundational goal is to establish and sustain a culture in which
sexual harassment, sexual assault, and retaliation are not tolerated, condoned, or ignored. This goal is
directly linked to Army readiness because a safe and respectful environment is essential for unit
cohesion, trust, morale, and operational effectiveness. The program integrates prevention, response,
accountability, and advocacy to achieve this objective at every level of the Army organization.
3. The ‘Not In My Squad (NIMS)’ campaign is best described as:
A. A voluntary social program for Soldiers who want to participate in team-building exercises
B. A leader-led initiative that empowers squad-level leaders and Soldiers to take
personal ownership of unit climate and commit to zero tolerance for sexual harassment
and assault
C. A mandatory punishment program for units with SHARP incidents
D. A congressional oversight committee for military justice reform
Rationale: Not In My Squad (NIMS) is a grassroots prevention initiative that challenges squad leaders
and individual Soldiers at every level to take personal responsibility for maintaining a professional,
respectful environment within their immediate teams. NIMS recognizes that cultural change begins at
the lowest tactical level and empowers Soldiers to intervene, support peers, and hold each other
accountable. The campaign complements institutional-level SHARP policies by fostering decentralized
ownership of unit climate and readiness.
4. How does the SHARP Program connect to overall Army readiness?
A. SHARP training replaces physical fitness and weapons qualification requirements
B. Sexual harassment, assault, and retaliation erode unit cohesion, trust, morale, and
individual well-being, directly degrading combat readiness and mission effectiveness
C. SHARP compliance is unrelated to operational readiness metrics
D. Only combat units are affected by SHARP-related readiness concerns
Rationale: The Army’s connection between SHARP and readiness is fundamental to the program’s
rationale. Sexual harassment, assault, and retaliation destroy the trust and cohesion that units depend
on to accomplish their missions, particularly in high-stress operational environments. Victims and
bystanders who lose confidence in their unit’s climate become less effective, less committed, and more
likely to leave military service. SHARP program effectiveness is therefore a direct predictor of
organizational readiness, retention, and combat capability.
5. Which of the following is a core principle of the Army’s SHARP Program?
A. All reported incidents must be resolved through informal mediation between the parties