Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Revision for Component 3 Politics

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
10
Geüpload op
09-05-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

Revision Notes for A-level Edexcel Politics Component 3, comparative paper 3. Notes included cover all areas of: Supreme Court and Civil Rights, Constitution and Federalism, Congress, Presidency, Presidential and Congressional Elections, Checks and Balances, and Democracy and Participation. ++ BONUS: Outline of the Application of Comparative Theories for Q2.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

A-level Politics
Component 3 Revision:

Useful Resources:
Skills Booklet (Super useful for Questions and Exam Guidance)

BBC News/The Times/The Telegraph/Financial Times/The Spectator/The Economist/BBC Radio 4/The Guardian

The Politics Shed

Tutor2u

University of Oxford/Oxford Academic and the London School of Economics and Political Science

A level Politics - Specification

Home - Supreme Court of the United States

United States Congress: Facts and Figures | Think Tank | European Parliament (View PDF within website)

A Comprehensive Guide to All USA Presidents: Their Impact and Legacy

U.S. Constitution | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress (The US Constitution (referencing purposes))

The Constitution and the federal election process | Constitution Center

Trapped in a Two-Party System (Two Party System PDF)

SupremeCourt_LandmarkCases.pdf

Martin Luther King Jr.: Voice of Conscience, Vision of Freedom - Black History Month 2026

The global impact of George Floyd: How Black Lives Matter protests shaped movements around the world - CBS News

List of Interest Groups in the United States 2026

U.S. Presidential Elections: Complete Results 1789-2024

Dark Money Hit a Record High of $1.9 Billion in 2024 Federal Races | Brennan Center for Justice

, US Supreme Court and Civil Rights:

• SCOTUS is the highest appellate court in the land and is made up of 9 permanent justices who sit
for life, nominated by President and confirmed by The Senate.
• Strict Constructionist: interpret as literally written (power of individual states).
• Loose Constructionist: Liberal interpretation to modernise (federal power).
• Originalist: Interprets to the view and attitudes of society at time of writing.
• Living Constitution is a view that the const. is adaptable to modern societal views.
• Judicial Review: The power of SCOTUS to declare unconstitutionality in exec. or leg.
• Judicial Activism: Judges promote desirable social ends (based on personal opinion of ruling)
• Judicial Restraint is opposite, with deference of decisions to exec. and leg.
• Imperial Judiciary: Unelected activist judges overreaching their constitutional power.
• Stare Decisis: ‘Let the decision stand’ refer all cases where possible to past precedent.
• The court has no power to initiate a case or, it relies on public view for legitimacy.
• The Court is political: appointed by President, confirmed by Senate, decisions on electoral
issues (abortion, gun control), some rulings appear as new laws (abortion).
• The Court is not political: cannot be fired so no pressure, justices avoid party politics, judges are
Con. or Lib. not Rep. or Dem., bound by legality of constitution.
• The court has been criticised for being unelected, unaccountable, abusing power and the
inaccuracies of interpretating a ‘living constitution’.
• Civil Rights are those guaranteed to all to prevent discriminatory or arbitrary treatment by
government or individuals.
• Civil Liberties: are those laid out in the constitution that provide protection over rights.
• Affirmative Action: Drive for multiculturalism in reparation for previous discrimination.
• Adv: Diversity, rights wrongdoings, creates equality in education and employment.
• Dis: Reverse discrimination, demographic over skill, encourages social discrimination.
• Since 1965 voting rights have increased with segregation and discrimination being made illegal,
however rooted discrimination has raised questions (e.g. photo ID). [SEE REP. IN CONGRESS].
• Immigration Reform has altered by Presidential turnover (9/11, DACA, Trump/Mexico).
• Roe v Wade (1973) [Supported abortion declaring it a defended right in the constitution].
• Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) [Overturned Roe v Wade and declared
abortion was not defended by 14th amendment of due process].
• Brown v. Board of Education (1954) [overturned Plessy v Ferguson declaring that racial
segregation in schools was unconstitutional].
• Marbury v. Madison (1803) [established JUDICIAL REVIEW].
• Miranda v. Arizona (1966) [established Miranda rights, 5th Amendment, interrogation cannot be
used as evidence in trial].
• Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections (1966) [removed poll taxes from elections demonstrating
wealth should not be a deciding factor of voting rights].
• Shelby County v. Holder (2013) [removed federal power (part of VRA 1965) to inspect state
electoral actions especially those that had previously encouraged disparity in voting].
• Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (2026) [ruled Trump’s tariffs to be unconstitutional].
• On April 6, 2023, it was reported that Thomas and his wife had taken undisclosed luxury trips
from Republican mega-donor Harlan Crow for more than two decades.
• In 2024, Representative AOC drew up impeachment articles for Thomas [These related to the
expenses scandal but not passed].
• Trump v. United States (2024) [This case ruled on the immunity of a previous President and set a
boundary on executive power not necessarily defined in the constitution].
• Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) [In favour of same-sex marriage, 12 years post calls for legalisation].
• United Sates v. Nixon (1974) [Watergate files be released and no one is above the constitution].
• Affirmative Action: Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) FOR, Fisher v. Uni of Texas (2013) FOR, (2016) FOR
WITH SCRUTINY, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (2023) AGAINST.
• Voting Rights Act (1965)/ George Floyd Justice in Policing Act (2021) [passed in H but not S].

Geschreven voor

Study Level
Publisher
Subject
Course

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
9 mei 2026
Aantal pagina's
10
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
SAMENVATTING

Onderwerpen

$22.06
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
leolifford

Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
leolifford Worcester Sixth Form College
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
-
Lid sinds
4 weken
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
18
Laatst verkocht
-

0.0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen