Reply 13.8
Liberty University
Hi Amber,
Your discussion board was short and concise. I really enjoyed the fact that you kept it
simple, yet you incorporated a lot of information that can be expounded on. I also believe that
your strength in this discussion is the fact that you were clear in every paragraph about the focus
and the intended purpose of that specific section. However, a little more information about the
chosen bible verses would have been a little more intriguing.
When analyzing the data that was given, I have come to an agreement with the act that
Appeal A has more responses than Appeal B did. The very reason why I believe it would be a
smart idea to request funding based on that appeal. In this particular section it was stated that
social factors were not an issue based on which letter appealed best to the community as a whole.
According to the text “Percentages serve two purposes in data presentation”. (Schindler, 2019) I
saw that you referenced one of the purposes. Percentages not only simplify the data by reducing
all numbers to a range from 0-10, but they also translate the data to a base of 100. (Schindler,
2019) This tends to be very easy to understand and analyze the situation immediately.
The second question again should that you agree with Appeal A having a higher
response rate than appeal B and I also agree with that. The information is self-explanatory and
there is not much insight information other than the general that has been given.
In the final question there was a conclusion that was formulated stating that social class is
the more powerful independent variable because the middle class had a lower rate than the
working class within these two appeals. Maybe its true, the social class its powerful but I would
think the answered should have been inconclusive. When I look at the social class I within this
Liberty University
Hi Amber,
Your discussion board was short and concise. I really enjoyed the fact that you kept it
simple, yet you incorporated a lot of information that can be expounded on. I also believe that
your strength in this discussion is the fact that you were clear in every paragraph about the focus
and the intended purpose of that specific section. However, a little more information about the
chosen bible verses would have been a little more intriguing.
When analyzing the data that was given, I have come to an agreement with the act that
Appeal A has more responses than Appeal B did. The very reason why I believe it would be a
smart idea to request funding based on that appeal. In this particular section it was stated that
social factors were not an issue based on which letter appealed best to the community as a whole.
According to the text “Percentages serve two purposes in data presentation”. (Schindler, 2019) I
saw that you referenced one of the purposes. Percentages not only simplify the data by reducing
all numbers to a range from 0-10, but they also translate the data to a base of 100. (Schindler,
2019) This tends to be very easy to understand and analyze the situation immediately.
The second question again should that you agree with Appeal A having a higher
response rate than appeal B and I also agree with that. The information is self-explanatory and
there is not much insight information other than the general that has been given.
In the final question there was a conclusion that was formulated stating that social class is
the more powerful independent variable because the middle class had a lower rate than the
working class within these two appeals. Maybe its true, the social class its powerful but I would
think the answered should have been inconclusive. When I look at the social class I within this
