two strategic options - Answers proactive and reactive
proactive strategy - Answers organization launches communication program that best fits its interests
and timeline
reactive strategy - Answers preemptive action, responses, diversion, modifying behavior
responding to external, outside forces
two aspects of proactive strategies - Answers action and communication
organizational performance - Answers what it does versus what it says
PR can't work if the organization is not in good standing
audience engagement - Answers using 2-way communication to engage audiences in your activities
special event - Answers staged event that gains attention of publics and encourages them to become
engaged with organization
alliance/coalition - Answers two or more organizations join together for common purpose
alliance: informal
coalition: formal
sponsorship - Answers providing a program directly or providing money, personnel, or other
resources
strategic philanthropy - Answers businesses financially support community relations with an
emphasis on employees and customers
activisim - Answers causes and/or movements
advocacy PR
publicity - Answers attention given by news media to organizations, person, event, product, or idea
provides third-party endorsement AKA credibility
generating news - Answers don't publicize unless you have something newsworthy to say
newswoty information - Answers information that offers audience a new idea or the latest
development
transparent communication - Answers open and observable activity by organization that helps the
public understand it
agenda setting - Answers media tells us what to think about
priming theory - Answers media sets the stage to provide context
framing theory - Answers how the media provides a perspective/frame
offensive response - Answers based on the premise that the organization is coming from a strong
position in the face of opposition
attack - Answers accusation of wrongdoing of accuser who is negligent or malicious
embarrassment - Answers organization tries to lessen opposition's influence by shame or humiliation
shock - Answers deliberate agitation of emotions with grotesque or disturbing content
threat - Answers harm will come if accuser doesn't stop making accusations
doubledown - Answers organization reiterates its actions or stance and stands firm regardless of
circumstances
defensive response - Answers organization reacting less aggressively
denial - Answers organization does not accept blame only if you can prove innocence
excuse - Answers organization tries to minimize its responsibility for harm or wrongdoing
justification - Answers admits organization did wrong but for good reason
strategic reversal - Answers organization reverses earlier direction or comment
diversionary response - Answers attempts to shift public attention from the organization's problem
concession - Answers organization tries to rebuild its relationship with its publics by giving the public
something it wants
ingratiation - Answers organization attempts to manage negative situation by charming its publics
disassociation - Answers organization attempts to distance itself from the wrongdoing
relabeling - Answers organization offers an agreeable name in replacement of negative label applied
by others
vocal commiseration - Answers organization expresses empathy and understanding about the
negative situation its publics is suffering from
Concern - Answers organization expresses it is not indifferent without admitting guilt
condolence - Answers organization expresses grief over someone's loss or misfortune without
admitting guilt