Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

AUE3761 Exam Revision May/June Past Papers & Answers 2026 |The Audit Process|

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
46
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
14-05-2026
Written in
2025/2026

This exam revision paper is more than just a set of questions and answers. It’s designed to help you understand how each answer is reached, so you’re not just memorising but actually learning the concepts behind them. The solutions are clear, accurate, and supported by reliable academic references. It also includes predicted questions that are likely to appear, giving you a practical sense of what to expect and how to approach them with confidence. Whether you’re revising last minute or using it to strengthen your understanding over time, it’s structured in a way that aligns with what examiners look for. The explanations are straightforward and focused, making it easier to follow and apply. If you take the time to work through it properly, achieving high grades is a realistic outcome.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview


‡ ⋆




AUE3761: The Audit Process
May/June Examination 2026

Covering Past Papers: 2023 – 2025

⋆ ⋄ ⋆ ⋄ ⋆ ⋄ ⋆ ⋄ ⋆

[ Auditing — College of Accounting Sciences [




_ Exam Revision Guide


AUE3761
Module Code:
The Audit Process
Module Name:
May/June 2023, May/June 2024, May/June 2025
Papers Covered:
May/June 2026 Examination
Prepared For:
100 marks per paper
Total Marks:
3 hours (closed book)
Duration:


Use this guide to revise thoroughly. Focus on application and understanding, not

rote memorisation.




‡ Exam Revision Notes | AUE3761 | 2023–2025 Papers

,AUE3761 | Exam Revision The Audit Process — May/June 2026


PAPER 1: MAY/JUNE 2025 EXAMINATION

AUE3761 — The Audit Process | 100 Marks | 3 Hours




Page 2 of 18 ‡

,AUE3761 | Exam Revision The Audit Process — May/June 2026



Question 1 [30 marks]




Question: Prestige Components (Pty) Ltd manufactures electronic components for the
automotive industry. During the planning phase of the audit, the following information
about their production cycle was shared with the audit team:

1. Purchase orders for raw materials are placed verbally by the production foreman and
confirmed via email after the fact.
2. A single stores clerk receives raw materials, updates the inventory records, and also
prepares the materials requisition notes for the production floor.
3. Inventory counts are performed annually by the same stores clerk who maintains the
inventory records.
4. There is no formal system matching goods received notes (GRNs) to purchase orders
before materials are accepted into the stores.
5. Component wastage and scrap are not formally recorded; the production supervisor
estimates them monthly.

Required:

(a) Identify the weaknesses in the production cycle described above and for each weak-
ness make suitable recommendations for improvement. Focus on: (i) source
documentation, (ii) controls over component inventory items, (iii) segregation of
duties, and (iv) inventory records. (20 marks)
(b) Briefly explain the overall audit strategy and describe the matters an auditor con-
siders when establishing it. (10
marks)



(a) 20 marks




Question: Weaknesses and recommendations relating to the production cycle of Prestige
Components (Pty) Ltd.




Page 3 of 18 ‡

, AUE3761 | Exam Revision The Audit Process — May/June 2026



Answer: (i) Source Documentation
Weakness: Purchase orders are placed verbally and only confirmed by email after the
order has already been placed. There’s no formal, pre-approved written purchase order
before the transaction occurs — that’s a glaring gap.
Recommendation: A pre-numbered, written purchase order must be raised and au-
thorised by the purchasing manager before any order is placed. The email confirmation
process should be replaced with a formal PO system (manual or electronic), so there’s a
proper paper trail from the start.

Weakness: Component wastage and scrap are estimated informally by the production
supervisor rather than being formally measured and recorded.
Recommendation: Introduce formal scrap and wastage records — pre-numbered docu-
ments signed off by both the production supervisor and an independent reviewer (such
as the financial manager). Reconcile scrap quantities against production output reports
monthly.

(ii) Controls Over Component Inventory Items
Weakness: There is no matching of GRNs to purchase orders before raw materials are
accepted into stores. Materials could be received without any authorisation, creating risk
of theft, over-ordering, or receiving incorrect goods.
Recommendation: Implement a three-way matching process: every delivery must
be matched to an authorised PO and a GRN before materials are accepted. The store-
keeper should sign a GRN only after confirming that quantities and specifications match
the purchase order.

Weakness: Annual inventory counts give very little assurance across the year. Errors
and losses can accumulate undetected.
Recommendation: Move to a continuous or cycle-counting approach — counting
portions of inventory throughout the year. High-value or fast-moving items should be
counted more frequently.

(iii) Segregation of Duties
Weakness: One stores clerk receives materials, updates inventory records, and raises
materials requisition notes. Concentrating all three functions in one person is a classic
segregation failure — errors and fraud could go undetected.
Recommendation: Split these functions across at least two people. The receiving



Page 4 of 18 ‡

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
May 14, 2026
Number of pages
46
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$3.51
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
LectureLab Teachme2-tutor
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
647
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
188
Documents
1431
Last sold
7 hours ago
LectureLab

LectureLab: Crafted Clarity for Academic Success Welcome to LectureLab, your go-to source for clear, concise, and expertly crafted lecture notes. Designed to simplify complex topics and boost your grades, our study materials turn lectures into actionable insights. Whether you’re prepping for exams or mastering coursework, LectureLab empowers your learning journey. Explore our resources and ace your studies today!

3.6

83 reviews

5
32
4
16
3
16
2
4
1
15

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions