Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

IOP3706 Exam Revision May/June Past Papers & Answers 2026 |Personnel Psychology: Employee Retention|

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
27
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
14-05-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

This exam revision paper is more than just a set of questions and answers. It’s designed to help you understand how each answer is reached, so you’re not just memorising but actually learning the concepts behind them. The solutions are clear, accurate, and supported by reliable academic references. It also includes predicted questions that are likely to appear, giving you a practical sense of what to expect and how to approach them with confidence. Whether you’re revising last minute or using it to strengthen your understanding over time, it’s structured in a way that aligns with what examiners look for. The explanations are straightforward and focused, making it easier to follow and apply. If you take the time to work through it properly, achieving high grades is a realistic outcome.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud


]]
‡ ⋆



IOP3706: Personnel Psychol-
ogy — Employee Retention
May/June Examination 2026 Revision Guide

Covers Examination Papers from 2023 to 2025

⋆ ⋄ ⋆ ⋄ ⋆ ⋄ ⋆ ⋄ ⋆

[ Industrial & Organisational Psychology [




_ Exam Revision Guide


IOP3706
Module Code:
Personnel Psychology: Employee Retention
Module Name:
May/June Examination 2026 Prep
Paper / Exam:
May/June 2023, 2024 & 2025 Papers
Coverage:
7
NQF Level:
College of Economic & Management Sciences
Faculty:


Understand the content deeply. Don’t just memorise — apply the theory to realistic

workplace scenarios, as UNISA examiners always set case-study questions.




‡ Exam Revision Notes | IOP3706 | 2023–2025

,IOP3706 | Exam Revision 2023–2025 Personnel Psychology: Employee Retention



Question 1 [May/June 2023 & 2024 — 25 marks]


(a) [10 marks]


Question: Distinguish between performance appraisal and performance manage-
ment. In your answer, explain the purpose of each and highlight how the two concepts
differ in scope, timing, and focus.


Answer: Performance appraisal is a formal, periodic evaluation of an employee’s
job performance against set standards or objectives. Think of it as a snapshot — a
structured review, usually annual or biannual, where a supervisor rates the employee and
the results get recorded.
Performance management, on the other hand, is a continuous process. It covers the
full cycle of planning, monitoring, developing, appraising, and rewarding performance.
So appraisal is actually just one component inside the broader performance management
system.
The key differences, laid out clearly:

 Key Concept
According to Cummings and Worley, performance management systems must
align individual goals with organisational strategy — this alignment piece is what
separates a true performance management system from a standalone appraisal
tool.


⋆ Exam Tip
When a question asks you to “distinguish between” two concepts, the examiner
wants explicit contrast, not just definitions side by side. Use a table or point-for-
point comparison. And always anchor your answer to a source (Grobler et al. is
the standard IOP3706 reference).




Page 2 of 27 ‡

, IOP3706 | Exam Revision 2023–2025 Personnel Psychology: Employee Retention



(b) [15 marks]


Question: Describe FIVE methods of performance appraisal and discuss the strengths
and limitations of each method.


Answer: There are several tools organisations use to evaluate performance. Each has
its moment — none is perfect across all situations.
1. Rating Scales (Graphic Rating Scales)
The evaluator rates the employee on a numerical or descriptive scale (e.g. 1–5) for a list
of competencies or behaviours.

• Strength: Simple to use, quick, easy to compare employees.
• Limitation: Prone to the halo effect (one good trait inflates all ratings) and cen-
tral tendency bias (everyone gets average scores to avoid conflict).

2. Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS)
Specific observable behaviours anchor each point on the rating scale — so instead of
rating “communication” as 3/5, the rater looks for defined examples of that behaviour.

• Strength: Reduces subjectivity; gives the employee clear behavioural targets.
• Limitation: Time-consuming and expensive to develop; different jobs need different
anchors.

3. 360-Degree Feedback
Input is collected from multiple sources — supervisor, peers, subordinates, and some-
times customers — then combined into a single profile.

• Strength: Comprehensive, reduces bias from any single rater.
• Limitation: Raters may inflate scores out of friendship (well, especially peers); can
feel threatening to employees.

4. Management by Objectives (MBO)
Manager and employee jointly set specific, measurable objectives at the start of the
period. Performance is judged against those agreed targets.

• Strength: Employees know exactly what is expected — ownership increases motiva-
tion.
• Limitation: Works poorly when goals are poorly defined; can promote short-termism
(hitting the target, ignoring everything else).




Page 3 of 27 ‡

Gekoppeld boek

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
14 mei 2026
Aantal pagina's
27
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$3.51
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
LectureLab Teachme2-tutor
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
647
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
188
Documenten
1431
Laatst verkocht
9 uur geleden
LectureLab

LectureLab: Crafted Clarity for Academic Success Welcome to LectureLab, your go-to source for clear, concise, and expertly crafted lecture notes. Designed to simplify complex topics and boost your grades, our study materials turn lectures into actionable insights. Whether you’re prepping for exams or mastering coursework, LectureLab empowers your learning journey. Explore our resources and ace your studies today!

3.6

83 beoordelingen

5
32
4
16
3
16
2
4
1
15

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen