Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

2026 RAC (Regulatory Affairs Certification) Practice Exam Update.

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
39
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
15-05-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

2026 RAC (Regulatory Affairs Certification) Practice Exam Update.

Instelling
2026 RAC Practi
Vak
2026 RAC Practi

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

2026 RAC (Regulatory Affairs
Certification) Practice Exam Update.




RAC Practice Exam Update Questions With
Complete Solutions




Question: A Special 510(k) must contain all of the following components EXCEPT:

• A. Proposed Labeling
• B. Design Controls Activity Summary
• C. 510(k) Summary or 510(k) Statement
• D. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data
• [Ans: - D. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data]

Explanation: Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data is not a requirement of a
Special 510(k).

Legal Reference Fragment: Sec. 807.87 Information required in a premarket
notification submission. [...] (j) For submissions claiming substantial equivalence to a
device which ha[s been classified] under section 513(b) of the act: (1) Which was
introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate co[mmerce] for co[mmercial]
distribution before December 1, 1990; and (2) For which no final regulation requiring
premarket approval has been i[ssued...] of the act, a summary of the types of safety and
effectiveness problems a[nd] devices being compared and a citation to the information
upon which th[e summary is based (class III] summary). The 510(k) submitter shall also

,certify that a reasonable searc[h of all information known] or otherwise available about
the class III device and other similar legally [marketed devices has been] conducted
(class III certification), as described in 807.94. This informatio[n shall include any
adverse safety and effectiveness] information that already has been submitted to the
Food and Drug Admi[nistration under] section 519 of the act. FDA may require the
submission of the adverse sa[fety and effectiveness data] described in the class III
summary or citation.




Context Text: Demineralized bone matrix alone (i.e., not combined with another
comp[onent]) meets the four criteria to be regulated solely under Section 361 of the
P[HS Act]. FDA, however, has determined the addition of certain components to DB[M],
[like] calcium phosphates, meets the definition of a device as they are intend[ed to
provide] function of the body by assisting in the filling of bone voids. These DBM
p[roducts are] regulated as devices by CDRH (510(k) clearance required) and as such
mu[st follow the] Quality System Regulation. In addition, the product also needs to
comply [with] 21 CFR 1271 Human Cells, Tissues and Cellular and Tissue-Based
Product[s for the HCT/P] component.

Question: You work for a company that is developing an autologous cellular therap[y.
You tell] your company that its product will be regulated as an HCT/P (Human Cel[ls,
Tissues, and] Tissue-Based Product). Based on this information, with which of the
follo[wing regulatory] requirements will your company need to be compliant when
manufactur[ing it?]

• A. 21 CFR (CGMP requirements for pharmaceuticals)
• B. 21 CFR 1271 and 21 CFR 820
• C. All Subparts of 21 CFR 1271 except Subpart C (Donor Eligibility)
• D. All Subparts of 21 CFR 1271
• [Ans: - C. All Subparts of 21 CFR 1271 exce[pt Subpart C (Donor]
Eligibility)]

Explanation: As the product is regulated under section 361 of the PHS Act, it is only
su[bject to] 21 CFR 1271, with the exception of Subpart C, as autologous products ar[e
exempt from donor] eligibility requirements.

,Clinical Trial Context:

• —Trials of drugs and biologics: controlled clinical investigations, other th[an
those for] a product subject to FDA regulation
• —Trials of devices: (a) a prospective clinical study of health outcomes
co[mpared] with a device, subject to FDA regulation, against a control in human
subj[ects (including] feasibility studies), and (b) pediatric postmarket surveillance

Question: The two mechanisms to amend an OTC Monograph are:

• A. Time & Extent Application (TEA) or Annual Report
• B. Time & Extent Application (TEA) or Citizen Petition
• C. Annual Report or Preapproval Supplement
• D. Citizen Petition or Preapproval Supplement
• [Ans: - B. Time & Extent A[pplication (TEA) or Citizen] Petition]

Question: Which of the following is NOT required in a Biologics License Application
[BLA as compared to a] New Drug Application (NDA)?

• A. FDA form 3397 (user fee cover sheet)
• B. Field copy certification
• C. Chemistry section
• D. Debarment certification
• [Ans: - B. Field copy certification]

Explanation: Field copy certification only applies to NDA products, whereas all of the
o[ther choices are] requirements for both BLAs and NDAs.

Context Text: A treatment IND would be most suitable for this application (answer 1).
T[reatment INDs are intended] as a means of providing eligible subjects with
investigational drugs or bio[logics to treat] serious and life-threatening illnesses for
which there are no suitable alte[rnatives].

Question: You are assigned the task of obtaining an Orphan Drug Designation (ODD[)
for a] drug for new onset Type I diabetes mellitus. Which of the following is NO[T a]
consideration for this ODD application?

• A. The ODD application must be submitted for review to FDA Office of Or[phan
Products] Development (OOPD)
• B. This investigational drug may qualify for ODD as new onset Type I diab[etes is
a] medically plausible disease subset under the Orphan Drug Act

, • C. The ODD application must be submitted electronically to the OOPD t[hrough
the FDA] Submission Gateway (ESG)
• D. The scientific rationale and population prevalence are two areas of the
[application] most critically reviewed by FDA
• [Ans: - C. The ODD application must be su[bmitted to] the OOPD through
the FDA Electronic Submission Gateway (ESG)]

Explanation: Sponsors may send the submission directly to OOPD on physical media
with a sign[ed cover] letter.

Question: How many days does FDA have to review an Abbreviated 510(k)?

• A. 30 days
• B. 60 days
• C. 90 days




1. Which of the following must be submitted to FDA before
conducting a clinical investigation of a significant risk medical
device in the United States?
A. PMA
B. IDE
C. 510(k)
D. De Novo request
[Correct Ans - B. IDE]

Explanation:
An Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) is required to conduct a clinical study of a
significant risk device in order to collect safety and effectiveness data.




2. A 510(k) submission is based on a claim that a new device is:
A. Safe and effective
B. Identical to all marketed devices
C. Substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device

Geschreven voor

Instelling
2026 RAC Practi
Vak
2026 RAC Practi

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
15 mei 2026
Aantal pagina's
39
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$14.49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
NURSING2EXAM Teachme2-tutor
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
1075
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
519
Documenten
4585
Laatst verkocht
2 uur geleden
Good luck

Hello, my documents are 100% guaranteed to help you Ace in your studies, my goal is to empower and help you in your career, i represent more professional nursing specialties and other courses. I'm a friendly person, don't hesitate to contact me. Good luck

4.6

692 beoordelingen

5
578
4
35
3
27
2
4
1
48

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen