Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

Topic Say Hi to AI: The Role of AI in Strategic Communication

Rating
-
Sold
1
Pages
37
Uploaded on
17-05-2026
Written in
2025/2026

Lecture 1 notes from the AI in Strategic Communication course at Universiteit van Amsterdam (2025/2026). Covers foundational concepts including the definition of strategic communication, three communication lenses (one-way, two-way, omnidirectional diachronic), seven factors that make issues strategic, and approaches to defining AI systems (demystification vs. anthropomorphic). Essential for understanding how AI relates to organizational communication strategy and stakeholder engagement—saves time synthesizing key frameworks and definitions from the first lecture.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

AI in Strategic Communication
LECTURE 1

Strategic Communication
= encompasses all communication that is substantial for the survival and sustained success of an entity
(Zerfass, 2018)

Entity
= humans and non-humans (companies, NGOs, etc)

3 criteria
1.​ sphere of responsibility / influence
2.​ contested purpose (mission → advancing AI)
3.​ limited resources (prioritization, protecting assets)

(All) Communication
= interactive process of meaning construction

​ 3 lenses (Van Ruler, 2018)

1.​ One-way (linear) process
-​ no feedback, predictable pattern




2.​ Two-way process
-​ interactive, meanings not fixed, receivers not passive (Altman responding)

, 3.​ Omnidirectional Diachronic process
= interplay between social actors, related to each other only in the context of developing their
meaning continuously over time, constructing society itself and constructing ideas about how
organizations in society should behave (Van Ruler, 2018)

​ ​ Omnidirectional
-​ interaction with the process of meaning construction
-​ not linear → goes in multiple directions
-​ actors not related or in proximity

​ ​ Diachronic
-​ not static → development happens over time
-​ continuously moving forward, always dependent on the past




-​ informing present and future
-​ a continuous cycle

Implications of the omnidirectional diachronic model
→ communication is about LISTENING, not only Messaging
→ communication is NOT LIMITED TO FORMAL MESSAGES, but also ACTIONS that convey
meaning
→ communication happens in INTERNAL and EXTERNAL arenas

Substantial
= objective + subjective dimension
-​ subjective = CEOs identify issue as strategic
-​ objective = the real (retrospective) impact

,7 factors that make an issue strategic

1.​ Resource-driven → demands allocation of high-value assets or valuable resources
-​ pouring money into AI = strategic

2.​ Competition-driven → strengthens a competitive edge/bypasses direct competition
-​ AI poses a competitive advantage, keeps companies competitive

3.​ Environment-driven → comes with political, technological or ecological changes
-​ AI is a political issue; companies want to have their own software to remain
independent from larger companies

4.​ Risk-driven → escalates into a high-risk scenario and forces a critical decision/triggers crisis
-​ AI’s decision-making can be biased and cause unequal treatment

5.​ Innovation-driven → introduces groundbreaking changes that disrupt existing structures or
methods
-​ becomes substantial for the survival of the organization

6.​ Engagement-driven → leverages free resources to signal strategic priorities and influence
stakeholders
-​ investing in AI signals priorities and further direction of the company

7.​ Operationally-driven → overhauls organization and processes of the organization
-​ organizations change as a consequence of AI implementation

strategic significance = can only be understood in retrospect
-​ easily missed, inaccurately prioritized or deprioritized

Defining AI (System)
Demystification Approach
→ mathematical, focused on processes
→ treats AI as a tool

A machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how
to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence
physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and
adaptiveness after deployment (OECD, 2024)


Anthropomorphic Approach
​ → treats AI as human, refers to human intelligence
​ → effectance motivation → humans want to make sense of the complex world & connect

Efforts to understand human intelligence by recreating a mind within a machine and to develop
technologies that perform tasks associated with some level of human intelligence (Guzman & Lewis,
2020) → centers around AI’s human abilities

, Effectance Motivation Example
→ humans have the innate need to control, master and understand the environment and when AI
behaves in unpredictable ways, they project human characteristics (anthropomorphism) onto it to make
sense of its actions and regain a sense of control

General AI = human-like version of AI capable of executing multiple complex tasks, smart robots
Narrow AI = specific focus (image or text generation), autonomous driving

Autonomy = degree to which a system can learn or act without human involvement (OECD, 2024)
-​ self-driving cars

Adaptiveness = degree to which a system can continue to evolve after initial deployment (OECD,
2024)
-​ using user behavior (moving emails to spam) to continuously refine filters

Mind Matters (Grey et al.)
-​ explored how people explore different entities (person, animals, god, AI)
-​ abilities are attributed based on two factors

1.​ Agency → act & intent
-​ thought, self-control, memory, morality, planning, communication

2.​ Experience → feel & sense
-​ personality, hunger/pain/pleasure, fear/rage/joy, pride/embarrassment, desires,
consciousness

Findings
→ humans score high on agency and experience
→ AI scores high on agency (autonomous tasks), but low on experience (no feelings or free will)
→ when we humanize AI → AI appears more likable, less dangerous, relatable, engaging, desirable
__________________________________________________________________________________

LECTURE 2 - Organizational Sensitivity & Machine Learning

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
May 17, 2026
Number of pages
37
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Dr. lotte willemsen
Contains
All classes

Subjects

$21.00
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
luciebayerov

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
luciebayerov Universiteit van Amsterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
1
Member since
1 week
Number of followers
0
Documents
1
Last sold
1 week ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions