, PLEASE USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A GUIDE ONLY
Answer 1
REPORT ON AN INVESTIGATION INTO HOW THE OPEN LEARNING BURSARY
SCHEME WORKED
1. TERMS OF REFERENCE
On 1 May 2026, Ms Thando Morule, Student Support Manager at Marara Technical College,
requested that Ms Motle, the Administrative Officer, investigate the functioning of the Open
Learning Bursary scheme, the progress of student applications, and inconsistencies in the awarding
of funds. The full report, including recommendations, was to be submitted to the Student Support
Manager by 30 May 2026.
2. PROCEDURES
The following procedures were followed to gather relevant information:
2.1 Consultation with the Chief Financial Officer of the Open Learning Bursary scheme, Ms Owen,
to determine eligibility criteria and the progress of applications.
2.2 Meeting with ten Student Representative Council (SRC) leaders to understand how students were
affected and possible assistance strategies.
2.3 Administration of questionnaires to students across all college programmes to identify groups
most affected by funding inconsistencies.
2.4 Discussions involving three SRC members, a college finance representative, and the Open
Learning Bursary scheme at a local radio station to explore potential solutions.
3. FINDINGS
3.1 From discussions with the CFO, it was found that delays occurred due to incomplete application
submissions, insufficient verification processes, and understaffing in the bursary office. Clear
timelines for fund disbursement were not consistently communicated to students.
3.2 SRC leaders reported that students experienced frustration and stress due to delayed allowances.
Students who had received partial funding (transport, accommodation, food) expressed
dissatisfaction as the remaining funds for study materials were pending.
3.3 Questionnaires indicated that first-year and financially disadvantaged students were
disproportionately affected. 65% of respondents had not received any funding despite their
applications being approved.
3.4 Radio discussions revealed a lack of coordination between the bursary office and the college
finance department. Miscommunication led to inconsistent distribution of allowances and no formal
grievance channel for students.
Answer 1
REPORT ON AN INVESTIGATION INTO HOW THE OPEN LEARNING BURSARY
SCHEME WORKED
1. TERMS OF REFERENCE
On 1 May 2026, Ms Thando Morule, Student Support Manager at Marara Technical College,
requested that Ms Motle, the Administrative Officer, investigate the functioning of the Open
Learning Bursary scheme, the progress of student applications, and inconsistencies in the awarding
of funds. The full report, including recommendations, was to be submitted to the Student Support
Manager by 30 May 2026.
2. PROCEDURES
The following procedures were followed to gather relevant information:
2.1 Consultation with the Chief Financial Officer of the Open Learning Bursary scheme, Ms Owen,
to determine eligibility criteria and the progress of applications.
2.2 Meeting with ten Student Representative Council (SRC) leaders to understand how students were
affected and possible assistance strategies.
2.3 Administration of questionnaires to students across all college programmes to identify groups
most affected by funding inconsistencies.
2.4 Discussions involving three SRC members, a college finance representative, and the Open
Learning Bursary scheme at a local radio station to explore potential solutions.
3. FINDINGS
3.1 From discussions with the CFO, it was found that delays occurred due to incomplete application
submissions, insufficient verification processes, and understaffing in the bursary office. Clear
timelines for fund disbursement were not consistently communicated to students.
3.2 SRC leaders reported that students experienced frustration and stress due to delayed allowances.
Students who had received partial funding (transport, accommodation, food) expressed
dissatisfaction as the remaining funds for study materials were pending.
3.3 Questionnaires indicated that first-year and financially disadvantaged students were
disproportionately affected. 65% of respondents had not received any funding despite their
applications being approved.
3.4 Radio discussions revealed a lack of coordination between the bursary office and the college
finance department. Miscommunication led to inconsistent distribution of allowances and no formal
grievance channel for students.
