, Week 1 -
Digital Crime & Evidence
Wall (2004) -
What are cybercrimes?
Main Argument :
Cybercrime is not uniform phenomenone Umbrella term for internet enabled behaviour
> Must be chategorized based on what is exploited targeted
Methodology :
Conceptual +
Legal Analysis
Key-Concepts Cyber-dependant
:
, Cyber enabled & Computer content crimes
Conclusion: Effective policing& judicial authorization need distinct strategy per category
Grabosky(2001) -
Virtual Criminality: Old wine in new bottles?
Main Argument : Traditional Criminal behaviour adapted to a new digital medium - Not a new form of Malice
Methodology :
Comparative historical +
conceptual analysis of criminal modalities
Conclusion : Most cybercrimes are a modern version of Long-standing offenses
McGuire (2019) Why -
we still don't understand Cybercrime
Main Argument : Cannot be understood through technology only
a
must look at Situational interactions, environmental context (How + Where
Methodology :
Criminological theory critique d systemic framework development
Key-Concepts Hyper spatiality
: : Removal of traditional spacial boundaries ; "Way they do it: Automation of crime make it a
global threat
Conclusion Prevention fails
: a
try to force modern fluid digital networks into rigidtold criminological models
McGuire (2013) -
Cybercrime : Review of the evidence
Main Argument : Law enforcement & public policy lacks grasp of actual extent of theScale cost impact of CC
,
Methodology : Lit-rev
Conclusion Require formalized public-private partnership
: as tech-infra holds true data
Maras (2019) -
CC Laws & Investigations
Main Argument : CC investigations fundamentally hindered by clash borderless nature data
& territorial boundaries of international Law enforcement
Methodology :
Legal d policy analysis of international treaties
Key-Concepts Jurisdictional
: friction : Data crosses borders police , stops at borders; Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties
Conclusion International
: harmonization vital e otherwise offenders have safe havens
preventing prosecution
Digital Crime & Evidence
Wall (2004) -
What are cybercrimes?
Main Argument :
Cybercrime is not uniform phenomenone Umbrella term for internet enabled behaviour
> Must be chategorized based on what is exploited targeted
Methodology :
Conceptual +
Legal Analysis
Key-Concepts Cyber-dependant
:
, Cyber enabled & Computer content crimes
Conclusion: Effective policing& judicial authorization need distinct strategy per category
Grabosky(2001) -
Virtual Criminality: Old wine in new bottles?
Main Argument : Traditional Criminal behaviour adapted to a new digital medium - Not a new form of Malice
Methodology :
Comparative historical +
conceptual analysis of criminal modalities
Conclusion : Most cybercrimes are a modern version of Long-standing offenses
McGuire (2019) Why -
we still don't understand Cybercrime
Main Argument : Cannot be understood through technology only
a
must look at Situational interactions, environmental context (How + Where
Methodology :
Criminological theory critique d systemic framework development
Key-Concepts Hyper spatiality
: : Removal of traditional spacial boundaries ; "Way they do it: Automation of crime make it a
global threat
Conclusion Prevention fails
: a
try to force modern fluid digital networks into rigidtold criminological models
McGuire (2013) -
Cybercrime : Review of the evidence
Main Argument : Law enforcement & public policy lacks grasp of actual extent of theScale cost impact of CC
,
Methodology : Lit-rev
Conclusion Require formalized public-private partnership
: as tech-infra holds true data
Maras (2019) -
CC Laws & Investigations
Main Argument : CC investigations fundamentally hindered by clash borderless nature data
& territorial boundaries of international Law enforcement
Methodology :
Legal d policy analysis of international treaties
Key-Concepts Jurisdictional
: friction : Data crosses borders police , stops at borders; Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties
Conclusion International
: harmonization vital e otherwise offenders have safe havens
preventing prosecution
