Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

COVID-19 UNFOLDING Clinical Reasoning Case Study (Part I) / COVID-19-case study. Part I: Emergency Department (ED) SKINNY Reasoning. John Taylor, 68 years old.

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
9
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
24-05-2021
Geschreven in
2020/2021

Exam (elaborations) COVID-19 UNFOLDING Clinical Reasoning Case Study (Part I) / COVID-19-case study. Part I: Emergency Department (ED) SKINNY Reasoning. John Taylor, 68 years old. Part I: Emergency Department (ED) SKINNY Reasoning John Taylor, 68 years old Primary Concept Infection/Immunity Interrelated Concepts (In order of emphasis) • Clinical judgment NCLEX Client Need Categories Covered in Case Study NCSBN Clinical Judgment Model Covered in Case Study Safe and Effective Care Environment Step 1: Recognize Cues  • Management of Care  Step 2: Analyze Cues  • Safety and Infection Control Step 3: Prioritize Hypotheses  Health Promotion and Maintenance  Step 4: Generate Solutions  Psychosocial Integrity  Step 5: Take Action  Physiological Integrity Step 6: Evaluate Outcomes  • Basic Care and Comfort  • Pharmacological and Parenteral Therapies  • Reduction of Risk Potential  • Physiological Adaptation  Initial Triage Assessment in ED Present Problem: John Taylor is a 68-year-old African-American male with a history of type II diabetes and hypertension who came to the emergency department (ED) triage window because he felt crummy; complaining of a headache, runny nose, feeling more weak, “achy all over” and hot to the touch and sweaty the past two days. When he woke up this morning, he no longer felt hot but began to develop a persistent “nagging cough” that continued to worsen throughout the day. He has difficulty “catching his breath” when he gets up to go the bathroom. John is visibly anxious and asks, “Do I have that killer virus that I hear about on the news?” Personal/Social History: John lives in a large metropolitan area that has had over three thousand confirmed cases of COVID-19. He has been married to Maxine, his wife of 45 years and is retired police officer and active in his local church. 1. What data from the histories are RELEVANT and must be NOTICED as clinically significant by the nurse? (NCSBN: Step 1 Recognize cues/NCLEX: Reduction of Risk Potential) RELEVANT Data from Present Problem: Clinical Significance: RELEVANT Data from Social History: Clinical Significance: 2. What additional clarifying questions does the triage nurse need to ask John to determine if his cluster of physical symptoms are consistent with COVID-19? 3. Based on the clinical data collected, identify what measures need to be immediately implemented using the following clinical pathway. 4. What type of isolation precautions does the nurse need to implement if COVID-19 is suspected? What specific measures must be implemented to prevent transmission? Type of Isolation: Implementation Components: 5. What are the six steps in the chain of infection? Apply what is known about COVID-19 to each step. Six Steps: Coronavirus COVID-19: 1.Infection agent 2. Reservoir 3. Portal of existance 4.Mode of transmission 5. Portal of entry 6. Susceptible host 7. Is this patient a susceptible host? What step in the chain of infection does proper isolation precautions impact? Why? Patient Care Begins: Current VS: P-Q-R-S-T Pain Assessment: T: 100.3 F/38.8 C (oral) Provoking/Palliative: “moving makes it worse” P: 118 (regular) Quality: “achy” R: 20 (regular) Region/Radiation: “all over” BP: 164/88 MAP: 113 Severity: 5/10 O2 sat: 92% room air Timing: continuous 1. What VS data are RELEVANT and must be NOTICED as clinically significant by the nurse? (NCSBN: Step 1 Recognize cues/NCLEX: Reduction of Risk Potential Reduction of Risk Potential/Health Promotion and Maintenance) RELEVANT VS Data: Clinical Rationale: 2. What body system(s) will you assess most thoroughly performing a FOCUSED assessment based on the primary/priority problem? Identify correlating specific nursing assessments. (NCLEX: Reduction of Risk Potential/Physiologic Adaptation) PRIORITY Body System: PRIORITY Nursing Assessments: Current FOCUSED Nursing Assessment: GENERAL SURVEY: NEUROLOGICAL: HEENT: RESPIRATORY: CARDIAC: ABDOMEN: GU: INTEGUMENTARY: 3. What assessment data is RELEVANT and must be NOTICED as clinically significant by the nurse? (NCSBN: Step 1 Recognize cues/NCLEX: Reduction of Risk Potential Reduction of Risk Potential/Health Promotion & Maintenance) RELEVANT Assessment Data: Clinical Rationale: 4. Interpreting clinical data collected, what problems are possible? Which problem is the PRIORITY? Why? (NCSBN: Step 2: Analyze cues/Step 3: Prioritize hypotheses/NCLEX: Management of Care) Hint *Problems: List all the potential medical diagnoses that could be going on *Priority Problem: From the list of potential problems what do you think the patient is experiencing? Problems: Priority Problem: Rationale: 5. What nursing priority(ies) and goal will guide how the nurse RESPONDS to formulate a plan of care? (NCSBN: Step 4 Generate solutions/Step 5: Take action/NCLEX: Management of Care) Nursing PRIORITY: (Nanda) Maintaining pt airway GOAL of Care: (NOC) Clear lung sounds throughout, decreased shortness of breath Nursing Interventions: Rationale: Expected Outcome: Caring and the “Art” of Nursing 6. What is the patient likely experiencing/feeling right now in this situation? What can you do to engage yourself with this patient’s experience, and show that they matter to you as a person? (NCLEX: Psychosocial Integrity) What Patient is Experiencing: How to Engage: Reflect on Your Thinking to Develop Clinical Judgment To develop clinical judgment, reflect on your thinking that was used to complete this case study by answering the following questions: What did you do well in this case study? What weaknesses did this case study identify? What is your plan to make any weakness a strength? How will you apply what was learned to future patients?

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Part I: Emergency Department (ED)
SKINNY Reasoning




m
er as
co
eH w
o.
rs e
ou urc
o
aC s
vi y re



John Taylor, 68 years old
ed d




Primary Concept
ar stu




Infection/Immunity
Interrelated Concepts (In order of
emphasis)
is




● Clinical judgment
NCLEX Client Need Covered NCSBN Covered
Th




Categories in Case Clinical in Case
Study Judgment Study
Model
sh




Safe and Effective Care Environment Step 1: Recognize Cues ✔
● Management of Care ✔ Step 2: Analyze Cues ✔
● Safety and Infection Control Step 3: Prioritize Hypotheses ✔
Health Promotion and Maintenance ✔ Step 4: Generate Solutions ✔
Psychosocial Integrity ✔ Step 5: Take Action ✔
Physiological Integrity Step 6: Evaluate Outcomes ✔
● Basic Care and Comfort ✔



This study source was downloaded by 100000809733538 from CourseHero.com on 05-13-2021 18:48:44 GMT -05:00


https://www.coursehero.com/file/62369293/COVID-Case-studydocx/

, ● Pharmacological and ✔
Parenteral Therapies
● Reduction of Risk Potential ✔
● Physiological Adaptation ✔




m
er as
co
eH w
o.
rs e
ou urc
o
aC s
vi y re
ed d
ar stu
is
Th
sh




This study source was downloaded by 100000809733538 from CourseHero.com on 05-13-2021 18:48:44 GMT -05:00


https://www.coursehero.com/file/62369293/COVID-Case-studydocx/

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
24 mei 2021
Aantal pagina's
9
Geschreven in
2020/2021
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$17.99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
HIGHSCORE Masters
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
1511
Lid sinds
6 jaar
Aantal volgers
1280
Documenten
2038
Laatst verkocht
2 maanden geleden

3.8

264 beoordelingen

5
129
4
57
3
23
2
18
1
37

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen