Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

PSY2015F Research Methods Test Bank: 150+ Qs & Rationales (UCT)

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
123
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
25-05-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

Complete PSY2015F Quantitative & Qualitative Research Methods test bank based on the UCT curriculum. 150+ practice questions with detailed rationales. Covers all major topics: Research Foundations & Ethics (Belmont Report, confidentiality, IRB), Quantitative Research Design (true experiments, quasi-experiments, internal/external validity, confounding variables, Hawthorne effect), Sampling Methods (probability vs non-probability, simple random, stratified, cluster, snowball), Measurement & Validity (reliability, construct validity, Cronbach's alpha, scales of measurement), Descriptive Statistics (mean, median, mode, SD, normal distribution, z-scores, correlation), Inferential Statistics (hypothesis testing, t-tests, ANOVA, chi-square, p-values, Type I/II error, power), Qualitative Research (phenomenology, ethnography, grounded theory, trustworthiness, reflexivity), Mixed Methods & Evaluation Research (sequential designs, program evaluation). Perfect for exam prep.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

1|Page


PSY2015F QUANTITATIVE & QUALITATIVE
RESEARCH METHODS: COMPLETE TEST BANK
– 150+ QUESTIONS WITH DETAILED
RATIONALES | FIRST-CLASS PASS



## Table of Contents


| Section | Topic | Questions |
|---------|-------|-----------|
| Section 1 | Research Foundations & Ethics | 1-20 |
| Section 2 | Quantitative Research Design | 21-40 |
| Section 3 | Sampling Methods | 41-55 |
| Section 4 | Measurement & Validity | 56-70 |
| Section 5 | Descriptive Statistics | 71-85 |
| Section 6 | Inferential Statistics & Hypothesis Testing | 86-105 |
| Section 7 | Qualitative Research Foundations | 106-120 |
| Section 8 | Qualitative Data Collection & Analysis | 121-135 |
| Section 9 | Mixed Methods & Evaluation Research | 136-145 |
| Section 10 | NGN-Style Integrated Scenarios | 146-150 |

,2|Page


# Section 1: Research Foundations & Ethics


**Q1.** The scientific method is characterized by which of the
following features?


A) Intuition and personal experience
B) Empiricism, systematic observation, and testable hypotheses
C) Subjective interpretation of phenomena
D) Reliance on authority figures for knowledge


**Answer: B**


*Rationale:* The scientific method relies on empiricism (knowledge
gained through observation), systematic observation (controlled and
structured), and testable hypotheses that can be falsified. Science is
objective, not based on intuition, authority, or subjective interpretation
alone.


---


**Q2.** A researcher wants to study the effect of sleep deprivation on
reaction time. The independent variable in this study is:


A) Reaction time

,3|Page


B) The participants' age
C) Sleep deprivation
D) The testing environment


**Answer: C**


*Rationale:* The independent variable (IV) is the variable manipulated
by the researcher. Here, sleep deprivation is manipulated (e.g., 0 hours, 4
hours, 8 hours of sleep). Reaction time is the dependent variable (DV) –
the outcome measured.


---


**Q3.** Which of the following research questions is best suited for a
qualitative research approach?


A) What is the relationship between hours of study and exam scores?
B) How do first-year students experience the transition to university
life?
C) Does cognitive-behavioral therapy reduce anxiety scores compared to
medication?
D) What percentage of students experience test anxiety?


**Answer: B**

, 4|Page




*Rationale:* Qualitative research explores subjective experiences,
meanings, and social processes in depth. Option B asks about lived
experience ("how do... experience"). Options A, C, and D are
quantitative (relationships, comparisons, percentages).


---


**Q4.** The Belmont Report outlines three core ethical principles for
research with human subjects. Which of the following is NOT one of
these principles?


A) Respect for persons
B) Beneficence
C) Justice
D) Informed consent


**Answer: D**


*Rationale:* The Belmont Report (1979) identifies three principles:
Respect for persons (autonomy and protection of vulnerable groups),
Beneficence (maximize benefits, minimize harms), and Justice (fair
distribution of research burdens and benefits). Informed consent is an
application of Respect for persons, not a principle itself.

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
25 mei 2026
Aantal pagina's
123
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

$27.49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
itsjerestuviaguide

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
itsjerestuviaguide Teachme2-tutor
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
3
Lid sinds
5 maanden
Aantal volgers
1
Documenten
893
Laatst verkocht
1 week geleden
ALL KINDS OF EXAMS SOLUTIONS TESTBANKS, SOLUTION MANUALS & ALL EXAMS SHOP!!!!

Welcome to your ultimate academic resource center! We provide an extensive collection of verified test banks, solution manuals, and practice exam materials for a wide range of courses and textbooks. Our resources are designed to be powerful study aids to help you: Master complex concepts through step-by-step solutions. Test your knowledge and identify key areas for review. Prepare with confidence using practice questions that mirror exam formats. Think of our materials as your personal study partner—giving you the tools to practice effectively, understand deeply, and walk into every exam fully prepared. Browse our catalog to find the perfect resource for your course!

Lees meer Lees minder
0.0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen