Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Essay

Essay plan Memory

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
2
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
02-06-2026
Written in
2025/2026

Detailed AQA A-Level Psychology essay plans. Ideal for revising 16-mark questions, AO1 knowledge and AO3 evaluation, especially for students aiming for high grades.

Institution
Course

Content preview

Describe and evaluate research that has investigated the influence of anxiety in the accuracy of
EWT

Negative effect of anxiety Anxiety has a positive effect Yerkes- Dodson law- inverted U
 Johnson and scott- looked at the effect of weapons  Fight of flight- increases our alertness and improves
on recall. They led participants to believe they were memory, as we are aware of cues in situation.  Lower levels of anxiety produce lower levels of
going to take part in a lab study. recall accuracy.
 Yuille and Cutshall- they did a study on a real life
 Two conditions- low anxiety where they heard an shooting in a gun shop in Vancouver Canada. The  Memory becomes accurate as the level of anxiety
argument in the next room and saw a man walk shop owner shot the theif dead and 13 p’s agreed to experienced increases
through the waiting area holding a pen with grease take part in the study.
on his hands.  However there comes a point where the optimal
 Interviews took part 4-5 months after incident and level of anxiety is reached. This is point of
 High anxiety- participants overhead same argument compared to original police interviews made at the maximum accuracy and if they experience more
but also heard sound of breaking glass and a man time. The number of details reported in each account stress than this then accuracy of recall will
walking out holding a paper knife with blood on his determined accuracy. decrease.
hands.  They were also asked how stressed they were using
a 7 point scale and asked if they had emotional  This is an alternative- shows it has either a positive
 Findings- p’s had to pick out man from 50 photos, problems since. or negative effect not a definite effect and shows
49% were able to identify pen man but only 33% for both studies are right.
knife man.  Findings- witnesses were very accurate, little change
after 5 months. P’s that reported highest stress were
 Tunnel theory- witness attention narrows to focus on more accurate. 88% compared to 75% for the less
weapon stressed group. Minor details such as height, weight
changed only
Supporting study Ethical guidelines broken Field studies lack control

 Pickel conducted an experiment using scissors, a  A weakness is that many ethical guidelines were  Field studies such as yuille and cutshalls lack
handgun, a wallet or a raw chicken in a hairdressing broken. control, as they are real life eyewitnesses.
salon.
 This was shown In Johnson and scotts study when  For example, researchers interview eyewitnesses
 He found that eyewitness accuracy was significantly participants were deceived about the nature of the after the event and uncontrollable variables such
poorer in the high unusualness conditions (chicken study and not protected from harm, they exposed as participants looking at media coverage, PED and
and handgun). the p’s to a man holding a bloody knife which could affects of event may affect the participant’s recall
have caused extreme anxiety. of the event.
 Therefore, this suggests that the weapon focus effect
is due to unusualness rather than anxiety and  Therefore, the p’s may have left the experiment  Therefore, extraneous variables may be
therefore tells us nothing specifically about the feeling very stressed and anxious. However they can responsible for the accuracy of recall and affects of
effects of anxiety on EWT. Johnson and scott may be look at the cost benefit such as using these anxiety may be overwhelmed by these factors.
testing surprise rather than anxiety, they focus on experiments to compare with less controlled field
the weapon because they are surprised to see it. experiments.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
June 2, 2026
Number of pages
2
Written in
2025/2026
Type
ESSAY
Professor(s)
Unknown
Grade
A+

Subjects

$5.44
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
mehreenosman10

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
mehreenosman10 University College London
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
-
Member since
2 weeks
Number of followers
0
Documents
9
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions