Assignmnt -II
CART- 3,|4, AND 15)
Long
01 Citically examine thu Conupt o Eualit
belane Law as enshined in Atide 14o
the Consttution wth the help ol and mak
Judgement o< the Supnene Cout
ans Aticde 4 o) the Ondi an Consttuion
Statee
The Shate shau not deny to any penaon
eauality belne the law en the eqial
pnatetan o the laws with in the tennitoy
o ndia.
This anide is akundamental ight that
lensune thele ol aw and prohibib
anbitany disininion by thu state it
encompaee too ey priniplea
Eauality Bejone Lau - This
denised hono Bitish Common priniple it
las and
enbres hat eueAy indivìdual, aRgand lee
Stakus, iS subieck to the Sarme egal
Eauality froteton othe
o) the laus= Ths
, Ohigioaka torm
hom the Us Conthehon ond
mandateo
a Should pnaNide esuad
tection to
alumstanus indiiduals in similan
miic Eiaminahon o Anide j4
Hhnough landmank Supaeme (aunt
Judgnend
Stale oleot Berngal V.S Anwan AU
Santan I9S2)
Thu Supreme Cout held that Anhde l4
paohibit anbitay dasoiiahon but allaus
AEOsan able dami7ahon. Hawees, Such
dasoihaion must Sahiky two (onditi ona
H must be bao ed on an inkelligble
dientia.
H must have a atonal nes with te
ohjettiue Souaht to be achieved
iahi Raning Rausat Ns Stee ot
Souashta (i952)
doeo
that Atde l4
not pashibit heitenaed
(kailkeatin but onbido Claa t
eislation. the test o Ieasonable Clawfat
, 'DATE'
was ea iamed
Koyappa Ns State o Tamil Nadu
ottoduLed anew
a dimenaión to egaltty
Ju. Thi oat Juled tthit equality s
antthet4cal o anbitaineo and thatany
aabithaay state àhon i yntahittutions
Maneka Gondhi v Union a
Expandedthe Scape o< Antde l4 by.
inkin it with Ahde 9 and 21. the
Count held that . any laa aheeting esdand
Lbesty muat not be anbitay and must
paos th eot o heasonablenosd
Andina Nehu Gondhi vS Raj Nanain
1915)
Stuck dounAnticde 329A (dause )
iohodueud by the 39" Armendmuntwheh
plaud the elechon o Hae Prime Migitea
beyond udiual Aeiew. the louat beld
that Such abtiayexuaion viotaea
Anide l4.
CART- 3,|4, AND 15)
Long
01 Citically examine thu Conupt o Eualit
belane Law as enshined in Atide 14o
the Consttution wth the help ol and mak
Judgement o< the Supnene Cout
ans Aticde 4 o) the Ondi an Consttuion
Statee
The Shate shau not deny to any penaon
eauality belne the law en the eqial
pnatetan o the laws with in the tennitoy
o ndia.
This anide is akundamental ight that
lensune thele ol aw and prohibib
anbitany disininion by thu state it
encompaee too ey priniplea
Eauality Bejone Lau - This
denised hono Bitish Common priniple it
las and
enbres hat eueAy indivìdual, aRgand lee
Stakus, iS subieck to the Sarme egal
Eauality froteton othe
o) the laus= Ths
, Ohigioaka torm
hom the Us Conthehon ond
mandateo
a Should pnaNide esuad
tection to
alumstanus indiiduals in similan
miic Eiaminahon o Anide j4
Hhnough landmank Supaeme (aunt
Judgnend
Stale oleot Berngal V.S Anwan AU
Santan I9S2)
Thu Supreme Cout held that Anhde l4
paohibit anbitay dasoiiahon but allaus
AEOsan able dami7ahon. Hawees, Such
dasoihaion must Sahiky two (onditi ona
H must be bao ed on an inkelligble
dientia.
H must have a atonal nes with te
ohjettiue Souaht to be achieved
iahi Raning Rausat Ns Stee ot
Souashta (i952)
doeo
that Atde l4
not pashibit heitenaed
(kailkeatin but onbido Claa t
eislation. the test o Ieasonable Clawfat
, 'DATE'
was ea iamed
Koyappa Ns State o Tamil Nadu
ottoduLed anew
a dimenaión to egaltty
Ju. Thi oat Juled tthit equality s
antthet4cal o anbitaineo and thatany
aabithaay state àhon i yntahittutions
Maneka Gondhi v Union a
Expandedthe Scape o< Antde l4 by.
inkin it with Ahde 9 and 21. the
Count held that . any laa aheeting esdand
Lbesty muat not be anbitay and must
paos th eot o heasonablenosd
Andina Nehu Gondhi vS Raj Nanain
1915)
Stuck dounAnticde 329A (dause )
iohodueud by the 39" Armendmuntwheh
plaud the elechon o Hae Prime Migitea
beyond udiual Aeiew. the louat beld
that Such abtiayexuaion viotaea
Anide l4.
