Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

WGU C845 | VUN1 | Task 1 ,2& 3 | Passed on First Attempt | Latest Update | with Complete Solutions with 100% accuracy

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
28
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
19-06-2026
Written in
2025/2026

WGU C845 | VUN1 | Task 1 ,2& 3 | Passed on First Attempt | Latest Update | with Complete Solutions with 100% accuracy

Institution
WGU C845
Course
WGU C845

Content preview

For more exams
Email;


WGU C845 VUN1 Task 1 ,2& 3
Passed on First Attempt
Latest Update with Complete
Solutions with 100% accuracy
Information Systems Security (Western Governors University)




For more exams
Email;

,l For more exams
Email;
OMoARcPSD| 62837805




WGU C845 VUN1 Task 1 | Passed on First Attempt |Latest Update with
Complete Solution




VUN1 — VUN1 Task 1: Managing Security Operations and Access Controls
Information Systems Security - C845




A. Apply an Access Control Model
A.1. Chosen Access Control Model
I have chosen the Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) model. The principles
of RBAC are:

• Role Assignment: A user is assigned to a role based on their job
function (e.g., "Finance Analyst").
• Permission Assignment: Permissions to perform operations on
systems are assigned to roles, not to individual users.
• Session Management: A user activates a role to gain the associated
permissions for a session.
• Least Privilege: Users should only have the minimum level of access
necessary to perform their job duties.
The organization's access control structure, as seen in the user matrix, is
implicitly role-based (e.g., "Finance manager," "HR coordinator").
Applying a formal RBAC model would streamline this by ensuring
permissions are strictly tied to business functions, reducing complexity
and the potential for user error when assigning permissions.

A.2. Four Misalignments with RBAC Principles
1. Misalignment 1: Privilege Escalation Beyond Role Scope
For more exams

Email;

, For more exams
Email;
|62837805




Description: The "Junior system admin" (J. Lopez) has

"Domain admin" privileges. A junior role should not have the
highest level of access in a Windows environment.
• Conflict with RBAC: This violates the principle of least
privilege. The role "Junior system admin" implies a subset of
administrative duties, not unrestricted domain-wide control.
2. Misalignment 2: Unnecessary Access Across Departments
• Description: The "Finance analyst" (L. Cheng) has "Full access"
to the CRM, a system
primarily for Sales and Support. A finance role typically does not
require full modification rights in a customer relationship system.
• Conflict with RBAC: This violates least privilege and
separation of duties. It allows for potential data manipulation
outside the user's core business function.
3. Misalignment 3: Violation of User-Role Assignment Post-
Termination
• Description: The "HR assistant" (P. Ellis), who was terminated
on 2025-05-20, has an "Active" account status and successfully
logged in on 2025-06-29.
• Conflict with RBAC: RBAC requires timely revocation of role
assignments upon a change in employment status. An active
session for a terminated user completely bypasses the security
provided by the role structure.
4. Misalignment 4: Overly Broad Privileged Access
• Description: The "IT administrator" (T. Miller) has "Full admin"
access to "All internal systems," and the log shows they made a
firewall rule change without a ticket_id.
• Conflict with RBAC: While some access is necessary, blanket
"Full admin" access violates least privilege and impedes
accountability. It does not segment duties within the IT
department itself.




For more exams

Email;

Written for

Institution
WGU C845
Course
WGU C845

Document information

Uploaded on
June 19, 2026
Number of pages
28
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$21.49
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
BRAINBOOSTERS Howard Community College
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
765
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
257
Documents
25573
Last sold
4 hours ago

4.5

354 reviews

5
273
4
31
3
23
2
6
1
21

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions